|
I am the true Prophet.Now,prop y'alls selfs up and listen to
me.Haw,Haw,Haw! cuhulin |
TGxveWQgRGF2aWVzIHdhcyBhbmQgaXMgdGhlIG9ubHkgdHJ1ZS Bwcm9waGV0Li4uDQoNClRIT1Ug
U0hBTFQgTk9UIEJFQVIgRE9XTiBUTyBQUkFZIFRPIEZBTFNFIF BST1BIRVRTLCBTTyBTQVlUSCBU SEUgTE9SRCENCg0KTG9uZyBsaXZlIERhdmllcyEhISENCg0KSm 9obg0KDQo8Y3VodWxpbkB3ZWJ0 di5uZXQ+IHdyb3RlIGluIG1lc3NhZ2UgbmV3czo4NTA4LTQyRT Y1QjAzLTI3M0BzdG9yZWZ1bGwt MzI1My5iYXkud2VidHYubmV0Li4uDQo+SSBhbSB0aGUgdHJ1ZS BQcm9waGV0Lk5vdyxwcm9wIHkn YWxscyBzZWxmcyB1cCBhbmQgbGlzdGVuIHRvDQo+IG1lLkhhdy xIYXcsSGF3IQ0KPiBjdWh1bGlu DQo+ |
Mark Zenier wrote: In article , running dogg wrote: Sudan is run by Muslims, mostly of Arab descent. There are Christians in Sudan, but they're an oppressed minority, as are the blacks (as opposed to the Arabs, who run things). The people in Darfur who have been subjected to genocide by Arab Muslims are Black Christians. The Arab No, both sides in Dafur are Muslims. It's between the Arab pastoralists raising their livestock, and the African farmers. Military regimes favoring Islamic-oriented governments have dominated national politics since independence from the UK in 1956. Sudan has been embroiled in a civil war for all but 10 years since then. The war is rooted in northern economic, political, and social domination of non-Muslim, non-Arab southern Sudanese. Since 1983, the war and war- and famine-related effects have resulted in more than 2 million deaths and over 4 million people displaced. The ruling regime is a mixture of military elite and an Islamist party that came to power in a 1989 coup. Some northern opposition parties have made common cause with the southern rebels and entered the war as part of an anti-government alliance. Peace talks gained momentum in 2002-03 with the signing of several accords, including a cease-fire agreement. From: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/...k/geos/su.html dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
Peter Newman wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:32:53 GMT, David wrote: Are you a Dominionist? No, I don't see the need for a human of a sound mind to subscribe to any religion at all. (Sadly, unlike most; including yourself, it would seem.) I rely solely on reason, logic and the scientific method. You might perhaps say that I am an objectivist. An Objectivist, meaning a follower of Ayn Rand? Or merely a secular humanist? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:45:02 -0700, running dogg wrote:
Peter Newman wrote: On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:32:53 GMT, David wrote: Are you a Dominionist? No, I don't see the need for a human of a sound mind to subscribe to any religion at all. (Sadly, unlike most; including yourself, it would seem.) I rely solely on reason, logic and the scientific method. You might perhaps say that I am an objectivist. An Objectivist, meaning a follower of Ayn Rand? Or merely a secular humanist? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- I'm a Frisbeetarian. We believe that when you die your soul lands on the roof and you can't get it down. --Alice Cooper |
David wrote: On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:45:02 -0700, running dogg wrote: Peter Newman wrote: On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:32:53 GMT, David wrote: Are you a Dominionist? No, I don't see the need for a human of a sound mind to subscribe to any religion at all. (Sadly, unlike most; including yourself, it would seem.) I rely solely on reason, logic and the scientific method. You might perhaps say that I am an objectivist. An Objectivist, meaning a follower of Ayn Rand? Or merely a secular humanist? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- I'm a Frisbeetarian. We believe that when you die your soul lands on the roof and you can't get it down. --Alice Cooper Isn't that what already happened to your brain, 'tard boy? Continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
DaviD - And 'you' would Know !
{ Ah an Expert Opinion } ~ RHF . . . . . |
"David" wrote in message You are living in a fantasy construct. And you need to be hit over the head with dried up dog turd. B.H. |
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:29:28 GMT, David wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:18:05 GMT, (Peter Newman) wrote: On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:32:53 GMT, David wrote: Are you a Dominionist? No, I don't see the need for a human of a sound mind to subscribe to any religion at all. (Sadly, unlike most; including yourself, it would seem.) I rely solely on reason, logic and the scientific method. You might perhaps say that I am an objectivist. Peter Newman http://www.thomhartmann.com/deathof.shtml I don't see why I should even bother answering an article that starts with a quote of Karl Marx! Anything this man has every said has been discredited in practice, and millions of people suffered in the process. Anyone who still seriously believes in the dead horse of Marxism has no brain left. Let me remind you that I started this thread with Churchill's comments about Islam. You then retorted with a derisive statement of "crazy white men", presumably in defence of Islam. Now you turned to dying trees and environmentalism. Just another convenient way to badmouth those "crazy white men" who brought us the very civilization that feeds you and that you just love to despise, right? You should really look into the mirror and admit to yourself frankly why you hate civilization so much. You feel left a bit behind, don't you? Some deep-seated inferioity complex perhaps? Ah, about those dying trees, all you romantic tree huggers should read this: http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm (But I don't really expect you to believe it - of course, it was written by a white guy.) Peter Newman |
On 26 Jul 2005 22:57:42 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Tue 26 Jul 2005 08:09:33a, (Peter Newman) wrote in message news:42e622f3.3803171@news-server: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:47:48 GMT, David wrote: {snippage} You are living in a fantasy construct. It would have been enough to say simply "you are living in a fantasy", or "you are living in a fantasy world". But you just had to use the oh-so-fashionable (in the leftie world) word "construct", didn't you. It makes you look oh-so-smart! I guess it's OK if you are content to *look* smart instead of *be* smart. Everyone comes to that conclusion about rickets, usually within two, or at most three posts. Your tolerance for utter B.S. is admirable! -=jd=- I had no idea it was a ''leftie'' word. Excuse me for my verbal precisilon. Fascists don't like people with brains. |
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:43:23 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote: I don't see why I should even bother answering an article that starts with a quote of Karl Marx! Anything this man has every said has been discredited in practice, and millions of people suffered in the process. Anyone who still seriously believes in the dead horse of Marxism has no brain left. Let me remind you that I started this thread with Churchill's comments about Islam. You then retorted with a derisive statement of "crazy white men", presumably in defence of Islam. You go to war to secure the instrument of your demise (petroleum). That's pretty wack. Now you turned to dying trees and environmentalism. Just another convenient way to badmouth those "crazy white men" who brought us the very civilization that feeds you and that you just love to despise, right? You call this a hot-dog? You should really look into the mirror and admit to yourself frankly why you hate civilization so much. You feel left a bit behind, don't you? Some deep-seated inferioity complex perhaps? More of a love/hate relationship with ''civilization'' as you call it. Ah, about those dying trees, all you romantic tree huggers should read this: http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm (But I don't really expect you to believe it - of course, it was written by a white guy.) Peter Newman ''The Future The deforestation of tropical rain forests is a threat to life worldwide. Deforestation may have profound effects on global climate and cause the extinction of thousands of species annually.'' http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...station_4.html Written by our best scientific minds. |
|
Most of that is old hat to me.The brits don't know the truth about the
REAL british monarchy. cuhulin |
Y3VodWxpbjoNCg0KVGhleSAodGhlIGJyaXRzKSBtaWdodCBhY2 N1c2UgdXMgb2YgdGhlIHNhbWUs
IHRoYXQgd2UgZG8gbm90IGtub3cgdGhlIHdob2xlIHN0b3J5IG Fib3V0IHRoZSAiYnVzaCBtb25h cmNoeS4iICBUaGUgcHJpbmNlIGJ1c2ggKGdlb3JnZSkgaW5oZX JpdGVkIHRoZSBVUyB0aHJvbmUg ZnJvbSBoaXMgZmF0aGVyICJLaW5nIEJ1c2guIg0KDQo8ZWVyaW UtbXVzaWMtZnJvbS10aGUtdHdp bGlnaHQtem9uZS1pcy1oZWFyZC1wbGF5aW5nLWluLXRoZS1iYW NrZ3JvdW5kPg0KDQpKb2huDQoN CjxjdWh1bGluQHdlYnR2Lm5ldD4gd3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZS BuZXdzOjIwMjU4LTQyRTcxOTNF LTEzNDhAc3RvcmVmdWxsLTMyNTYuYmF5LndlYnR2Lm5ldC4uLg 0KPiBNb3N0IG9mIHRoYXQgaXMg b2xkIGhhdCB0byBtZS5UaGUgYnJpdHMgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyB0aG UgdHJ1dGggYWJvdXQgdGhlDQo+ IFJFQUwgIGJyaXRpc2ggbW9uYXJjaHkuDQo+IGN1aHVsaW4NCj 4= |
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:22:21 GMT, David wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:43:23 GMT, (Peter Newman) wrote: I don't see why I should even bother answering an article that starts with a quote of Karl Marx! Anything this man has every said has been discredited in practice, and millions of people suffered in the process. Anyone who still seriously believes in the dead horse of Marxism has no brain left. #1: Let me remind you that I started this thread with Churchill's comments about Islam. You then retorted with a derisive statement of "crazy white men", presumably in defence of Islam. You go to war to secure the instrument of your demise (petroleum). That's pretty wack. Go back to point #1 above. What you replied makes no sense whatsover in the context of this discussion: I did not go to any war for petroleum, and petroleum is certainly not an instrument of my demise. If you meant to say that the US (or all "crazy white men"?), then exactly the same applies. Let me also suggest that you stop driving a car, don't use any public transport, immediately switch off any electrical appliances in your home, including your computer. I wonder where you live. I bet you live somewhere where you don't have to work too hard, thanks to the very civilization that you hate so much. You know what? You are simply bored. Move somewhere where you will need to work really hard in order to be able to eat and have a decent roof above your head. Then you will see things from a different perspective and take fewer things for granted. #2: Now you turned to dying trees and environmentalism. Just another convenient way to badmouth those "crazy white men" who brought us the very civilization that feeds you and that you just love to despise, right? You call this a hot-dog? You don't make sense. Go back to #2 above and then switch on your brain. You should really look into the mirror and admit to yourself frankly why you hate civilization so much. You feel left a bit behind, don't you? Some deep-seated inferioity complex perhaps? More of a love/hate relationship with ''civilization'' as you call it. Time to make an appointment with a psychiatrist as soon as possible. Ah, about those dying trees, all you romantic tree huggers should read this: http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm (But I don't really expect you to believe it - of course, it was written by a white guy.) ''The Future The deforestation of tropical rain forests is a threat to life worldwide. Deforestation may have profound effects on global climate and cause the extinction of thousands of species annually.'' http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...station_4.html Written by our best scientific minds. Says someone who really desperately *wants* to believe this politically correct crap. You are simply seeking justification for your anger and hatred, whose real reason is your very own inferiority complex - just be a man and admit it to yourself. Buy the Lomborg book and get the *real* story, from a *real* scientist. I promise this will be an eye opener for you. But I guess you don't really want to open your eyes, do you. You like it better this way - the more alarmist, the more apocalyptic, the more proving of your "crazy white men" crap, then the better it feels, because you just like to wallow in that negativity, like a pig in ****, don't you! I started this thread talking about Muslims. But you are talking about deforestation. I guess you don't realize that by desperately searching for any suitable negative subject to justify your initial "crazy white men" outburst, you are precisely confirming what I am saying - you are entirely messed up. I hope it is not too late for you. You *can* fix your brain up, but first you do need to be honest to yourself. Peter Newman |
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:34:57 GMT, David wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:42:21 -0500, wrote: Throwing money and food to other countries,some countries,results in the rulers of those countries siphoning off the food and money for things that does not help those countries. cuhulin Mr. Bono circumvents the corrupt state authorities by using NGOs to administer the help. Firstly, in a thoroughly corrupt country (like most countries in Africa are), corruption is a way of life, hence even NGOs will be, and indeed are, corrupt and inefficient - they are not staffed with angels, but with real, local people. But this is not the most important point. The main point is that throwing money to the poor has never made them rich in the long term. It just makes the situation worse by making them dependent on handouts. To make them truly independent and thus conquer poverty, you need to get the economy going and teach the people how to fend for themselves. But in order to get economy going, you need to have a legal system and a law obiding society. In most African countries where you have violent thugs running berserk, corrupt governments, inefficient legal system and law enforcement, you can't start a business and no sensible foreign company will invest there either. And that's precisely why there is poverty in Africa. Peter Newman |
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:42:19 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote: I started this thread talking about Muslims. But you are talking about deforestation. I guess you don't realize that by desperately searching for any suitable negative subject to justify your initial "crazy white men" outburst, you are precisely confirming what I am saying - you are entirely messed up. I hope it is not too late for you. You *can* fix your brain up, but first you do need to be honest to yourself. I say crazy white people are the reason the Muslims are ****ed. Who gives the English the right to steal the Arab's oil? But I was especially angry that Geoge Bush appointed another Howdy Doodie looking cracker for the Supreme Nazi Court. http://www.esr.org/outreach/climate_...t/co2_temp.jpg |
War or no war,even in peacetime,U.S.A.MUST make sure U.S.A.has enough
oil. cuhulin |
On 26 Jul 2005 22:57:42 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Tue 26 Jul 2005 08:09:33a, (Peter Newman) wrote in message news:42e622f3.3803171@news-server: On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:47:48 GMT, David wrote: {snippage} You are living in a fantasy construct. It would have been enough to say simply "you are living in a fantasy", or "you are living in a fantasy world". But you just had to use the oh-so-fashionable (in the leftie world) word "construct", didn't you. It makes you look oh-so-smart! I guess it's OK if you are content to *look* smart instead of *be* smart. Everyone comes to that conclusion about rickets, usually within two, or at most three posts. Your tolerance for utter B.S. is admirable! Thanks. I am actually known by my friends for my patience. :-) I can see a good potential in every human being. I think David also has a fairly good potential - but he does lack insight, information and experience. If he is, say, 18 years old, then all this would be understandable. If he is 30, then you are right, he would be a truly hopeless case. Peter Newman |
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:56:32 GMT, David wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:42:19 GMT, (Peter Newman) wrote: I started this thread talking about Muslims. But you are talking about deforestation. I guess you don't realize that by desperately searching for any suitable negative subject to justify your initial "crazy white men" outburst, you are precisely confirming what I am saying - you are entirely messed up. I hope it is not too late for you. You *can* fix your brain up, but first you do need to be honest to yourself. I say crazy white people are the reason the Muslims are ****ed. The Muslims are not ****ed because of "crazy white people". They are ****ed with any of their neighbours regardless of colour, Indonesia, Phillippines, Thailand, Sudan, etc. And Sunnis are ****ed with Shiites. Islam's borders are bloody everywhere. Muslims are ****ed precisely because their religion is making them so. But of course, you like to blame the "crazy white man" for everything don't you. Makes you feel oh so-o-o good! Who gives the English the right to steal the Arab's oil? What are you talking about? Are the English stealing the Arab's oil? Where exactly? What a load of rubbish. As far as I know, the world (including the English) are *buying* oil from the Arabs. For high prices. And the Arabs, instead of them using their fortune wisely, are mostly wasting it. And don't you realize that without these "crazy white men", the Arabs would not even know that oil exists and what to do with it? But I was especially angry that Geoge Bush appointed another Howdy Doodie looking cracker for the Supreme Nazi Court. Frankly, I don't think you truly understand what "Nazi" means. I wish you had to spend just one day under a real Nazi regime, to start fully appreciating the society you have the priviledge living in. (Which many other people would kill for, and which you don't deserve.) In a Nazi society, you would go to a concentration camp for just speaking against it. You really have no idea what you are talking about. http://www.esr.org/outreach/climate_...t/co2_temp.jpg Global warming cyclical, says climate expert By Philip Hopkins June 13, 2005 Carbon dioxide is not a harmful gas and has helped produce the "green" world agricultural revolution, according to an Australian climate expert. Rob Carter, from James Cook University in Townsville, said the rising level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in recent decades had boosted agricultural crop yields. "Carbon dioxide is the best aerial fertiliser we know about," he told the Victorian Farmers Federation in Morwell late last week. Professor Carter, a marine geologist, is research professor in the university's Marine Geophysical Laboratory. He said the Kyoto Protocol would cost billions, even trillions, of dollars and would have a devastating effect on the economies of countries that signed it. "It will deliver no significant cooling - less than 0.02 degrees Celsius by 2050," he said. "The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been the main scaremonger for the global warming lobby . . . Fatally, the IPCC is a political, not a scientific body." To understand climate change, it was necessary to look at the longer record, he said. Through an examination of material taken from deep below the ocean floor, marine geologists could study layers of earth's history similar to the way a tree's age could be determined by tree rings. "We are in a relatively warm period today," he said. "But 20,000 years ago, it was as cold as it has ever been - that was the peak of the last glaciation." Professor Carter said that over 2.5 million years there had been 50 glacial and interglacial periods. Of the past 400,000 years, the earth had been colder for 90 per cent of the time, with briefer warmer periods of about 10,000 years. He said the earth was now at the end of a warmer period, and reputable climate-change scientists agreed that the climate was going to get colder. The debate was whether it would take tens, hundreds or even thousands of years to occur. On a shorter time scale, Professor Carter said the earth had broadly got warmer in the modern period, from 1860 to 2000, although it had also been warmer in Roman and medieval times. There had also been a Little Ice Age between 1550 and the 19th century, when the Thames used to freeze over. A cooling trend took place between 1940 and 1970, when temperatures began to rise again, reaching a peak in 1998. "This coincided with the biggest El Nino in the 20th century," he said. However, research by the climate research unit at East Anglia University in Britain had shown that the average global temperature had declined since 1998. Professor Carter said greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide were not causing the earth to warm up. On both annual and geological (up to 100,000-year) time scales, changes in temperature preceded changes in carbon dioxide, he said. This was true even in the famous 1960-1991 graph showing rising amounts of carbon dioxide. Professor Carter said that without the natural greenhouse effect, the average earth temperature would be minus 18 degrees Celsius, compared with the average of plus 15 Celsius that had nurtured the development of life and civilisation. Water vapour made up about 95 per cent of the greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide was a minor greenhouse gas, responsible for 3.6 per cent of the total greenhouse effect, he said. Of this, only 0.12 per cent, or 0.036 degrees Celsius, could be attributed to human activity. Climate had always changed and "always will", he said. "The only sensible thing to do about climate change is to prepare for it." |
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:15:27 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote: As far as I know, the world (including the English) are *buying* oil from the Arabs. For high prices. And the Arabs, instead of them using their fortune wisely, are mostly wasting it. WRONG! We prop up dictators who do not share the bounty with the people. And don't you realize that without these "crazy white men", the Arabs would not even know that oil exists and what to do with it? \ That probably would have worked-out better But I was especially angry that Geoge Bush appointed another Howdy Doodie looking cracker for the Supreme Nazi Court. Frankly, I don't think you truly understand what "Nazi" means. I wish you had to spend just one day under a real Nazi regime, to start fully appreciating the society you have the priviledge living in. (Which many other people would kill for, and which you don't deserve.) Nationalist Socialist Fascist Corporatist Rich ****s Rule In a Nazi society, you would go to a concentration camp for just speaking against it. You really have no idea what you are talking about. http://www.esr.org/outreach/climate_...t/co2_temp.jpg Global warming cyclical, says climate expert By Philip Hopkins June 13, 2005 Carbon dioxide is not a harmful gas and has helped produce the "green" world agricultural revolution, according to an Australian climate expert. Rob Carter, from James Cook University in Townsville, said the rising level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in recent decades had boosted agricultural crop yields. "Carbon dioxide is the best aerial fertiliser we know about," he told the Victorian Farmers Federation in Morwell late last week. Professor Carter, a marine geologist, is research professor in the university's Marine Geophysical Laboratory. http://planetforlife.com/gwarm/glob1000.html Blame it on the moo cows, then. You're going down, Whitey. |
Jon Rappaport's article,What They Are Messing With,at
www.nomorefakenews.com A lot of folks nowdays don't know what FREEDOM is and why FREEDOM is so important and why some folks fight and die for FREEDOM.FREEDOM has become an ugly word in govts all over the World,including U.S.fed govt. cuhulin |
|
Long ago (according to Bob Vila,the home remodeling guy for Sears
Craftsman tools) when Georgians started moving into Florida,of course they took their cattle and livestock with them.About the same thing as the old western cattledrives.They used their whips to make cracking noises to keep them moving along and that is why they were called crackers.It makes plenty of sense to me.I rather be a cracker than a rickets anyday. cuhulin |
It is the "crazy white men" (I am not racist,there are a lot of other
people of color whom are very smart too) who maintain and keep those oil wells going.The ragheads (not confusing India with ragheads,they are smart too) can't keep those oil wells going by themselves.I noticed oil is about $60.00 per barrel nowdays.If we are stealing their oil,why is it I paid $31.00 and pocket change yesterday afternoon to fill my car's tank up with gasoline to the tune of $2.07.9 at the MurphyUSA gas station? Gasoline should be dirt cheap if we are stealing their oil.I am heading on over to the Goodwill store now to see what kind of junk I don't need,(and flirt with the women over there too) might as well burn a little of that oil I bought yesterday.That married Irish woman wayyyy over yonder across the big pond tells me,Larry,you don't need any more junk! cuhulin |
It is obvious, the middle east countries have the largest WMD which has ever
existed, it is also a "natural" one--oil. They can simply bring us to our knees by refusing to sell it to us, or demanding a thousand dollars a barrel. It is self-evident! John "Peter Newman" wrote in message news:42e7afbe.5425046@news-server... On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:56:32 GMT, David wrote: On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:42:19 GMT, (Peter Newman) wrote: I started this thread talking about Muslims. But you are talking about deforestation. I guess you don't realize that by desperately searching for any suitable negative subject to justify your initial "crazy white men" outburst, you are precisely confirming what I am saying - you are entirely messed up. I hope it is not too late for you. You *can* fix your brain up, but first you do need to be honest to yourself. I say crazy white people are the reason the Muslims are ****ed. The Muslims are not ****ed because of "crazy white people". They are ****ed with any of their neighbours regardless of colour, Indonesia, Phillippines, Thailand, Sudan, etc. And Sunnis are ****ed with Shiites. Islam's borders are bloody everywhere. Muslims are ****ed precisely because their religion is making them so. But of course, you like to blame the "crazy white man" for everything don't you. Makes you feel oh so-o-o good! Who gives the English the right to steal the Arab's oil? What are you talking about? Are the English stealing the Arab's oil? Where exactly? What a load of rubbish. As far as I know, the world (including the English) are *buying* oil from the Arabs. For high prices. And the Arabs, instead of them using their fortune wisely, are mostly wasting it. And don't you realize that without these "crazy white men", the Arabs would not even know that oil exists and what to do with it? But I was especially angry that Geoge Bush appointed another Howdy Doodie looking cracker for the Supreme Nazi Court. Frankly, I don't think you truly understand what "Nazi" means. I wish you had to spend just one day under a real Nazi regime, to start fully appreciating the society you have the priviledge living in. (Which many other people would kill for, and which you don't deserve.) In a Nazi society, you would go to a concentration camp for just speaking against it. You really have no idea what you are talking about. http://www.esr.org/outreach/climate_...t/co2_temp.jpg Global warming cyclical, says climate expert By Philip Hopkins June 13, 2005 Carbon dioxide is not a harmful gas and has helped produce the "green" world agricultural revolution, according to an Australian climate expert. Rob Carter, from James Cook University in Townsville, said the rising level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in recent decades had boosted agricultural crop yields. "Carbon dioxide is the best aerial fertiliser we know about," he told the Victorian Farmers Federation in Morwell late last week. Professor Carter, a marine geologist, is research professor in the university's Marine Geophysical Laboratory. He said the Kyoto Protocol would cost billions, even trillions, of dollars and would have a devastating effect on the economies of countries that signed it. "It will deliver no significant cooling - less than 0.02 degrees Celsius by 2050," he said. "The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been the main scaremonger for the global warming lobby . . . Fatally, the IPCC is a political, not a scientific body." To understand climate change, it was necessary to look at the longer record, he said. Through an examination of material taken from deep below the ocean floor, marine geologists could study layers of earth's history similar to the way a tree's age could be determined by tree rings. "We are in a relatively warm period today," he said. "But 20,000 years ago, it was as cold as it has ever been - that was the peak of the last glaciation." Professor Carter said that over 2.5 million years there had been 50 glacial and interglacial periods. Of the past 400,000 years, the earth had been colder for 90 per cent of the time, with briefer warmer periods of about 10,000 years. He said the earth was now at the end of a warmer period, and reputable climate-change scientists agreed that the climate was going to get colder. The debate was whether it would take tens, hundreds or even thousands of years to occur. On a shorter time scale, Professor Carter said the earth had broadly got warmer in the modern period, from 1860 to 2000, although it had also been warmer in Roman and medieval times. There had also been a Little Ice Age between 1550 and the 19th century, when the Thames used to freeze over. A cooling trend took place between 1940 and 1970, when temperatures began to rise again, reaching a peak in 1998. "This coincided with the biggest El Nino in the 20th century," he said. However, research by the climate research unit at East Anglia University in Britain had shown that the average global temperature had declined since 1998. Professor Carter said greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide were not causing the earth to warm up. On both annual and geological (up to 100,000-year) time scales, changes in temperature preceded changes in carbon dioxide, he said. This was true even in the famous 1960-1991 graph showing rising amounts of carbon dioxide. Professor Carter said that without the natural greenhouse effect, the average earth temperature would be minus 18 degrees Celsius, compared with the average of plus 15 Celsius that had nurtured the development of life and civilisation. Water vapour made up about 95 per cent of the greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide was a minor greenhouse gas, responsible for 3.6 per cent of the total greenhouse effect, he said. Of this, only 0.12 per cent, or 0.036 degrees Celsius, could be attributed to human activity. Climate had always changed and "always will", he said. "The only sensible thing to do about climate change is to prepare for it." |
David wrote: On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:15:27 GMT, (Peter Newman) wrote: As far as I know, the world (including the English) are *buying* oil from the Arabs. For high prices. And the Arabs, instead of them using their fortune wisely, are mostly wasting it. WRONG! We prop up dictators who do not share the bounty with the people. And don't you realize that without these "crazy white men", the Arabs would not even know that oil exists and what to do with it? \ That probably would have worked-out better But I was especially angry that Geoge Bush appointed another Howdy Doodie looking cracker for the Supreme Nazi Court. Frankly, I don't think you truly understand what "Nazi" means. I wish you had to spend just one day under a real Nazi regime, to start fully appreciating the society you have the priviledge living in. (Which many other people would kill for, and which you don't deserve.) Nationalist Socialist Fascist Corporatist Rich ****s Rule In a Nazi society, you would go to a concentration camp for just speaking against it. You really have no idea what you are talking about. http://www.esr.org/outreach/climate_...t/co2_temp.jpg Global warming cyclical, says climate expert By Philip Hopkins June 13, 2005 Carbon dioxide is not a harmful gas and has helped produce the "green" world agricultural revolution, according to an Australian climate expert. Rob Carter, from James Cook University in Townsville, said the rising level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in recent decades had boosted agricultural crop yields. "Carbon dioxide is the best aerial fertiliser we know about," he told the Victorian Farmers Federation in Morwell late last week. Professor Carter, a marine geologist, is research professor in the university's Marine Geophysical Laboratory. http://planetforlife.com/gwarm/glob1000.html Blame it on the moo cows, then. You're going down, Whitey. So please tell us, what colour are you? dxAce Michigan USA |
Glad to see you remember your 7th grade geography lessons. However, if
you will go back and reread what I actually wrote you will find that I was not making a reference to what the book said. Merely that it was written in the same time that GB and RU were engaged in a wide number of imperialist activities. One of which was the Great Game. |
"John S." wrote: Glad to see you remember your 7th grade geography lessons. However, if you will go back and reread what I actually wrote you will find that I was not making a reference to what the book said. Merely that it was written in the same time that GB and RU were engaged in a wide number of imperialist activities. One of which was the Great Game. Nice back track...! Point was, the quote itself had nothing what so ever to do with your comment. Keep trying. dxAce Michigan USA |
dxAce wrote: "John S." wrote: Glad to see you remember your 7th grade geography lessons. However, if you will go back and reread what I actually wrote you will find that I was not making a reference to what the book said. Merely that it was written in the same time that GB and RU were engaged in a wide number of imperialist activities. One of which was the Great Game. Nice back track...! Point was, the quote itself had nothing what so ever to do with your comment. Not sure I understand...your post was chained directly below mine. Keep trying. dxAce Michigan USA |
"John S." wrote: dxAce wrote: "John S." wrote: Glad to see you remember your 7th grade geography lessons. However, if you will go back and reread what I actually wrote you will find that I was not making a reference to what the book said. Merely that it was written in the same time that GB and RU were engaged in a wide number of imperialist activities. One of which was the Great Game. Nice back track...! Point was, the quote itself had nothing what so ever to do with your comment. Not sure I understand...your post was chained directly below mine. I'm sure you don't understand. That puts me a leg up on you. Not that I wasn't sure before, but this certainly confirms it. Continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
|
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:12 -0400, dxAce
wrote: Continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA Is this a baggage fetish... |
David wrote: On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:00:12 -0400, dxAce wrote: Continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA Is this a baggage fetish... Yeah, it's much like your ongoing off topic post fetish, 'tard boy. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
Greg wrote:
I'm sure you don't understand. That puts me a leg up on you. Not a pretty picture! I'll say. The picture was posted here by a friend of the Ace's a few months back. Being unsophisticated slobs, we interpreted the photo as homosexual pornography instead of what it appears now to be: The Ace just having a 'leg up' on another guy. mike |
dxAce wrote:
From: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/...k/geos/su.html dxAce When did the CIA become an accurate reporter of world facts? We're going to need a more credible source. It's the Iraq fiasco, you understand... mike |
From: m II Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:45:20 GMT Subject: The true Prophet? Greg wrote: I'm sure you don't understand. That puts me a leg up on you. Not a pretty picture! I'll say. The picture was posted here by a friend of the Ace's a few months back. Being unsophisticated slobs, we interpreted the photo as homosexual pornography instead of what it appears now to be: The Ace just having a 'leg up' on another guy. mike ....not to mention the electrical shock hazard! Greg |
Peter Newman wrote:
So why'd we invade Iraq? To get rid of Saddam Husein and his Baath party. The Administration went to great lengths to explain that regime change was NOT the reason for invasion. That would have been illegal under UN rules. Weapons of Mass Destruction were the justification. These weapons were located East, West, North, South and a little North West of Baghdad. Remember? It was a 'Slam Dunk'.. mike |
m II wrote: dxAce wrote: From: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/...k/geos/su.html dxAce When did the CIA become an accurate reporter of world facts? We're going to need a more credible source. It's the Iraq fiasco, you understand... Well, I'm certainly going to believe the CIA before I believe some stupid Canuck. dxAce Michigan USA |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com