RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   muslims Call Radio Host's Comments Hate - Filled (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/75293-muslims-call-radio-hosts-comments-hate-filled.html)

[email protected] July 31st 05 04:28 PM

www.tenc.net
cuhulin


Brian Hill July 31st 05 07:07 PM


"-=jd=-" wrote in message jd. Why do guys
keep beating a dead horse with this guy? I kinda wish you
all would just ignor the mf. He's mentally ill you know? GFC

B.H.




It's recreational?

-=jd=-



Whew! wipes brow I was fearful that maybe you guys thought you could talk
sense into him? I should have given you more credit. Carry on.

B.H.



David July 31st 05 07:09 PM

On 31 Jul 2005 18:55:06 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

I say ''smarts'' is bigger than any being and a value inherent in the
universe. There is an original DNA molecule who likes to travel.


Opinions vary dramatically...


-=jd=-

Not my idea of drama. It's really not at all imortant.

We're here, but not for much longer, because we have dilled the
Airstream.


David July 31st 05 07:10 PM

On 31 Jul 2005 18:56:11 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:



God knows everything

Nobody knows everything

God is Nobody



You are making gross presumptions again, I see...

-=jd=-

Technically, that was a ''deduction'' not a ''presumption''...


Brian Hill July 31st 05 07:20 PM


"David" wrote in message


Technically, that was a ''deduction'' not a ''presumption''...


No you cant deduce because your reasoning is flawed and therefore you've
been bumped back into the presumption dept. Mr. Rickets! Good Day!

B.H.



RHF July 31st 05 07:36 PM

DaviD - When the 'finite' becomes the "INFINITE" . . .
e.g. When the 'infinite' becomes the "FINITE" . . .
http://www.captainatlantis.com/newagep15.htm

David July 31st 05 07:47 PM

On 31 Jul 2005 11:36:48 -0700, "RHF"
wrote:

DaviD - When the 'finite' becomes the "INFINITE" . . .
e.g. When the 'infinite' becomes the "FINITE" . . .
http://www.captainatlantis.com/newagep15.htm
.
What Comes Around (Physical) Goes Around {Meta-Physical}
http://www.autopenhosting.org/direct...mic-space.html

.
" God is Nobody " = God Is (In) Everybody
http://www.carm.org/islam/obj_God_finite.htm
[ Therefore - God Is In Each Of Us ]
.
As Carl Sagan Said "We Are Made of Star Stuff"
http://www.skeptic.com/04.4.sagan-tribute.html
http://www.stmarys.ca/academic/conte...e1/page01.html

.
Simply Open Up Your Heart and Let Him {God} In/Out - Amen ~ RHF
. . . . .

We were talking - about the space between us all
And the people - who hide themselves behind a
wall of illusion
Never glimpse the truth - then it's far too late -
when they pass away.

We were talking - about the love we all could
share - when we find it
To try our best to hold it there - with our love
With our love - we could save the world - if
they only knew.

Try to realise it's all within yourself no-one else
can make you change
And to see you're really only very small,
and life flows on within you and without you.

We were talking - about the love that's gone so
cold and the people,
Who gain the world and lose their soul -
they don't know - they can't see - are you one
of them?

When you've seen beyond yourself - then you
may find, peace of mind is waiting there -
And the time will come when you see
we're all one, and life flows on within you and
without you.

--George Harrison


David July 31st 05 07:49 PM

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:07:04 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:



"-=jd=-" wrote in message jd. Why do guys
keep beating a dead horse with this guy? I kinda wish you
all would just ignor the mf. He's mentally ill you know? GFC

B.H.




It's recreational?

-=jd=-



Whew! wipes brow I was fearful that maybe you guys thought you could talk
sense into him? I should have given you more credit. Carry on.

B.H.


Who are you? One of those pricks who gets ''hall monitor'' duty and
gets a big head about it?


[email protected] July 31st 05 07:50 PM

What's an mf? Massey Ferguson Farm Tractors?
cuhulin


Honus July 31st 05 07:56 PM


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Sat 30 Jul 2005 05:01:49p, "Honus"
wrote in message news:1VRGe.6080$Tk6.5106@trnddc02:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Fri 29 Jul 2005 07:47:51p, "Honus"
wrote in message news:HezGe.63$4e6.53@trnddc04:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...

If you want to believe everything evolved or "just happened" by

pure,
random chance, then that same logic would have you believe that a
tornado
could pass through a junk-yard and spit out a functioning Boeing

747,
just
by pure, random chance.

That, of course, is a -thorough- mischaracterization of biological
evolution.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.html


http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html



It is an over-generalization, but the root-point is the same. The

fossil
record provides evidence of many different forms of life -- but there

have
been no transitional forms found, save for a scant few lizards that
appeared to have feather-like features that have been presumed to be

the
onset of birds. Well, that's still a presumption, or a leap in logic or
faith that is loosely based on fact, but not completely supported by

the
historical record. Perhaps one day it may be, but not yet.


There are quite a few more transitionals than you realize.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html



Which still requires "leaps in logic/faith" to span the gaps. It is
sprinkled with phrases similar to "we don't know", "remains unknown", etc.


Another creationist fallacy. Anytime a fossil is found that neatly fits
between two others, creationists point out that the new discovery merely
creates two more gaps. If we have #1 and #3 and then add #2, the question
immediately arises "Where is 1.5?" It's never ending, no amount of
transitionals will satisfy, and a perfect line of of descent with
mother/daughter type relationships isn't going to be found. The therapsid to
mammal chain is particularly fine-grained, though. It's worth investigating,
for so-inclined.

But the evolutionist is "convinced" in his belief nonetheless. Because of
that, I see little difference between the two camps.


I humbly suggest you look much harder. :)






Brian Hill July 31st 05 08:01 PM


"David" wrote in message


Who are you? One of those pricks who gets ''hall monitor'' duty and
gets a big head about it?


Who are you? One of those pricks who thinks everyone is stupid minus
yourself? So you keep bugging the **** out of everyone thinking your saving
us from ourselves because your to stupid to see we're ****ing with you
because you wont shut the **** up. And the wheel goes round and round and I
keep thinking you must be a troll because nobody is that stupid and what
idiot would pick RRS as a platform to push the **** your trying to make us
swallow. Shove off clown or get back on topic!

B.H.



David July 31st 05 08:37 PM

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:50:05 -0500, wrote:

What's an mf? Massey Ferguson Farm Tractors?
cuhulin

Maynard Ferguson used to take LSD and sit on Tim Leary's roof, playing
his horn.


David July 31st 05 08:39 PM

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:01:30 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:


Moderation in the defense of Liberty is no virtue, Clyde.



Honus July 31st 05 11:06 PM


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Sun 31 Jul 2005 02:56:37p, "Honus"
wrote in message news:F99He.8339$DJ5.3005@trnddc07:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Sat 30 Jul 2005 05:01:49p, "Honus"
wrote in message news:1VRGe.6080$Tk6.5106@trnddc02:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...
On Fri 29 Jul 2005 07:47:51p, "Honus"
wrote in message
news:HezGe.63$4e6.53@trnddc04:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. 20...

If you want to believe everything evolved or "just happened" by

pure,
random chance, then that same logic would have you believe that a
tornado
could pass through a junk-yard and spit out a functioning Boeing

747,
just
by pure, random chance.

That, of course, is a -thorough- mischaracterization of biological
evolution.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.html


http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html



It is an over-generalization, but the root-point is the same. The

fossil
record provides evidence of many different forms of life -- but
there
have
been no transitional forms found, save for a scant few lizards that
appeared to have feather-like features that have been presumed to be

the
onset of birds. Well, that's still a presumption, or a leap in logic
or faith that is loosely based on fact, but not completely supported
by

the
historical record. Perhaps one day it may be, but not yet.

There are quite a few more transitionals than you realize.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html



Which still requires "leaps in logic/faith" to span the gaps. It is
sprinkled with phrases similar to "we don't know", "remains unknown",
etc.


Another creationist fallacy. Anytime a fossil is found that neatly fits
between two others, creationists point out that the new discovery merely
creates two more gaps. If we have #1 and #3 and then add #2, the
question immediately arises "Where is 1.5?" It's never ending, no amount
of transitionals will satisfy, and a perfect line of of descent with
mother/daughter type relationships isn't going to be found. The
therapsid to mammal chain is particularly fine-grained, though. It's
worth investigating, for so-inclined.



Oh boy -- The unsettling problem with gaps is from your own cited URL!


g I see you missed the point. I also see that neither of us is going to
convince the other. That's okay. The creationists and their like-minded
cronies can continue praying with no discernable result, while science will
continue to advance...doing things, like oh, curing and preventing disease
for example. The fact of the matter is that science works and produces
results that improves the quality of our lives...and evolutionary biology,
being an increasingly more imoprtant part of modern medicine, is included in
that statement. If I'm sick, I'd rather see a doctor than a priest.

But the evolutionist is "convinced" in his belief nonetheless. Because
of that, I see little difference between the two camps.


I humbly suggest you look much harder. :)



Yes, I have; and keep finding the same evolutionary progression similar to
the following:

Here we see the fossil "WhattaMattaRex" (a lizard) from the yaddacene era.
A gazillion years later, we see the presumed Nth evolution in the fossil
"ItsaMattaRex" from the later Discocene era. While we don't know exactly
when Creature-A morphed into Creature-B, it is a foregone scientific
conclusion that somewhere in the gazillion years between the Yaddacene and
Discocene, a miracle occurred that we can't fully explain. So to keep it
neat, we simply discard the gap as insignificant and declare the Nth
evolutionary form as directly descended, based on a single tooth fragment
that we found in a mud layer on another continent.


And again, more gross mischaracteriziation, albeit unintentional on your
part.

As a layman, that's what I hear them struggling to explain. So it's not a
question of small gaps. It's a question of presumptions that necessarily
have to be made from time to time. The fossil record may yet yield a
clearer picture. Someday. Maybe. Who knows...


It already has, and you haven't looked very diligently. I'd recommend, for
anyone so inclined, to study up on the "twin nested hierarchies" and the
mapping of the human genome. ;)

http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/apr00.html



David July 31st 05 11:10 PM

On 31 Jul 2005 21:49:36 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


On Sun 31 Jul 2005 02:10:40p, David wrote in message
:

On 31 Jul 2005 18:56:11 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:



God knows everything

Nobody knows everything

God is Nobody



You are making gross presumptions again, I see...

-=jd=-

Technically, that was a ''deduction'' not a ''presumption''...



You may only deduce from factual information. However, you can presume based
on a perception, skewed or otherwise. Ergo, you continue to jump to gross
presumptions.

-=jd=-

So which part is not factual?


David July 31st 05 11:11 PM

On 31 Jul 2005 21:55:28 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


On Sun 31 Jul 2005 03:39:06p, David wrote in message
:

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:01:30 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:


Moderation in the defense of Liberty is no virtue, Clyde.



What do you know about defending liberty, leech-boy?

-=jd=-

Enough to keep my head out of the sand.


Brian Hill July 31st 05 11:36 PM


"David" wrote in message

What do you know about defending liberty, leech-boy?

-=jd=-

Enough to keep my head out of the sand.


Your capacity for self degradation is really quite formidable Dave. Carry
on.

B.H.



m II August 1st 05 08:07 AM

dxAce wrote:

That's the problem with you dumbass Canucks... you don't think!



Quite right. We don't think you are typical of United States citizens, most of
whom are really decent people in comparison to you and your built in hatred of
all things human.

...continue to bore, Bozo..


yawnnnn




mike

m II August 1st 05 08:18 AM

wrote:

Ahhhhh,Forget you,m II.You are a ,,,,,,,,,,,,, ......... ///////////
cuhulin



I may well be an assortment of punctuation marks, but at least I don't lust
after dogs like you've fantasized about here..pervert.


Get help, you deviant.







mike

dxAce August 1st 05 12:41 PM



m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

That's the problem with you dumbass Canucks... you don't think!


Quite right.


Well, at least you admit it!

dxAce
Michigan
USA



m II August 1st 05 04:28 PM

dxAce had written for him:


m II wrote:


dxAce wrote:


That's the problem with you dumbass Canucks... you don't think!


Quite right.



Well, at least you admit it!




...yawn...wow, this be powerful boring. I was wide awake three seconds
ago...yawn...






mike


m II August 1st 05 04:37 PM

Brian Hill wrote:
"David" wrote in message



Who are you? One of those pricks who gets ''hall monitor'' duty and
gets a big head about it?



Who are you? One of those pricks who thinks everyone is stupid minus
yourself? So you keep bugging the **** out of everyone thinking your saving
us from ourselves



How dare he! That's *MY* job. Man..you carve yourself out a little niche in the
salvation business and next thing you know someone's trying to muscle in on your
racke..er..cough..cough..BUSINESS..business. He should be ashamed of himself.







mike

dxAce August 1st 05 04:39 PM



m II wrote:

dxAce had written for him:


m II wrote:


dxAce wrote:


That's the problem with you dumbass Canucks... you don't think!


Quite right.



Well, at least you admit it!


...yawn...wow, this be powerful boring. I was wide awake three seconds
ago...yawn...


Guess you'd better go back to bed then, 'tard. You're certainly not going to
accomplish anything today.

Oh, by the way, I discovered what m II stands for... 'Mental Midget'.

LMFAO at the stupid Canuck.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



[email protected] August 1st 05 11:30 PM

Carl Sagan was right about that,we are made of Star stuff.If a certain
Star haden't exploded eons ago,we wouldn't be here.
cuhulin


[email protected] August 1st 05 11:33 PM

I am a typical United States American Citizen.Just a normal fat old
coot,I am.
cuhulin


[email protected] August 1st 05 11:40 PM

In about an hour or so,I am fixin to get my typical American made
lawnmower out with it's typical Briggs & Stratton typical four and a
half typical Horsepower engine on it and mow my typical American yard
and sweat like a typical American made Mule.Look out typical American
made grass and weeds,here I typically am fixin to mow you down,your a..
is grass and I am the mf (Massey Ferguson) lawnmower.
cuhulin


David August 1st 05 11:57 PM

On 01 Aug 2005 22:49:15 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


Why, all of it.
Your turn...


-=jd=-

So God does not know everything...


m II August 2nd 05 12:00 AM

dxAce wrote:

Oh, by the way, I discovered what m II stands for... 'Mental Midget'.


No doubt about it. That's why I can identify with every single one of your
postings. They're EXACTLY at my level comprehension. I know it's difficult for
you to write up to my level and I really appreciate the great effort you have to
make. I'm more than willing to put up with your grammatical guffaws for the sake
of cheap entertainment.

..
LMFAO at the stupid Canuck.


How does your 'Licking My Fat Anus Orbitally' act as an insult? That sort of
activity must be something you acquired in the armed forces while in training
for a commission. You can stop practicing on yourself now....deviant.









mike

m II August 2nd 05 12:05 AM

wrote:

If a certain
Star haden't exploded eons ago,we wouldn't be here.



I hadn't realized Elvis was that badly off.






mike

[email protected] August 2nd 05 01:00 AM

Don't you worry about Elvis Presley,he is doing much better than you
ever will.Do you know there is an Elvis Presley Trauma Center at the
University of Memphis,in Memphis,Tennessee?
cuhulin


David August 2nd 05 01:39 AM

On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:05:51 GMT, m II wrote:

wrote:

If a certain
Star haden't exploded eons ago,we wouldn't be here.



I hadn't realized Elvis was that badly off.

Time is distance but space is curved, so are you sure that star isn't
going to explode some time in the future?


David August 2nd 05 02:51 AM

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 19:00:11 -0500, wrote:

Don't you worry about Elvis Presley,he is doing much better than you
ever will.Do you know there is an Elvis Presley Trauma Center at the
University of Memphis,in Memphis,Tennessee?
cuhulin

I have an Elvis Presley Trauma Center in my pants.


David August 5th 05 01:55 AM

On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:32:22 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


On Mon 01 Aug 2005 06:57:42p, David wrote in message
:

On 01 Aug 2005 22:49:15 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


Why, all of it.
Your turn...


-=jd=-

So God does not know everything...


If it makes you happy to presume so. However, you still have yet to mention
any facts, factual information, etc...

-=jd=


Facts are the enemy of the truth.

(I'm guessing you don't get in-touch with your inner surrealist very
much...)


[email protected] August 5th 05 02:04 AM

No. We know the universe isn't really infinite, but it's so
staggeringly gigantic that to anyone other than a mathematician,
"infinite" is the most accurate way to convey the idea of something so
hugely big beyond all human comprehension.

Try imagining a trillion suns, then a trillion groups of a trillion
suns, then a trillion sets of groups each with a trillion groups of a
trillion suns, then....

Close enough to infinite for all practical purposes. :)

-- Ross


[email protected] August 5th 05 02:08 AM

What you're looking for might be (infinity - 1) + 1.

;)


[email protected] August 5th 05 02:17 AM

Ideological people are generally very stupid, because they take a few
received precepts and force the world to fit them as a substitute for
intelligent thought.

Doesn't matter whether the ideology is Communism or religion.

The problem isn't *intelligent* atheism but *unintelligent* absolutist
Communism or *unintelligent* absolutist free-marketism or absolutist
religion or unintelligent absolutist anything.

"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities"
-- Voltaire.


[email protected] August 5th 05 02:26 AM

They are MORON muslims dipped in Pig Fat and Pig Waste.Same as all
politicians are.Back to my movie on tv now,Flight of the
Navigator.COMPLY!
cuhulin


[email protected] August 5th 05 03:18 AM

And if there are any of Art Bell's and George Noory's (talk about a
couple of kooks!,Sheesh!) "space aliens" out there,they are so far away
they dont know we exist and we will never know if they exist.Time does
not exist and our Solar System only has about four and a half billion
years to go before it is all toast.Four and a half billion years is
nothing in the grand scheme of the Universe.As far as that is
concerned,it is like a gate that is open and closed at the same time and
we go though that gate but at the same time we do not go through that
gate.We are gone before we are here.COMPLY!
cuhulin


David August 5th 05 02:34 PM

On 4 Aug 2005 18:17:39 -0700, wrote:

Ideological people are generally very stupid, because they take a few
received precepts and force the world to fit them as a substitute for
intelligent thought.

Doesn't matter whether the ideology is Communism or religion.

The problem isn't *intelligent* atheism but *unintelligent* absolutist
Communism or *unintelligent* absolutist free-marketism or absolutist
religion or unintelligent absolutist anything.

"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities"
-- Voltaire.

The trouble is the trouble is.
--Arthur Brown (yes, that Arthur Brown)


[email protected] August 5th 05 04:41 PM

Ferguson himself denies that this ever happened.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com