I don't believe in unvarnished media, but that doesn't mean I want
Sirius's profit margin to determine what I can/cannot hear. To pay them
for that 'privilege' is like adding insult to injury.

On 18 Aug 2005 15:20:40 -0700, wrote:

I don't believe in unvarnished media, but that doesn't mean I want
Sirius's profit margin to determine what I can/cannot hear. To pay them
for that 'privilege' is like adding insult to injury.

You lack a basic grasp of the concept of niche broadcasting via
multichannel subsrciption services.

That's just what the Big Boys at Sirius allow you to think.

On 18 Aug 2005 17:32:29 -0700, wrote:

That's just what the Big Boys at Sirius allow you to think.

I'll tell you what I think. I think the WRN makes a lot more economic
sense to the broadcasters wanting to serve North America.

Keep thinking that. You're playing right into their hands.

On 18 Aug 2005 19:30:10 -0700, wrote:

Keep thinking that. You're playing right into their hands.

And vice versa. That's what my monthly fee gets me. Service.

Yeah, you don't have to make decisions for yourself anymore. That's
service.