Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ) writes: The heterodyne design (expecially the super heterodyne design) was a big advancement in radios many years ago,wasen't it? cuhulin It was a big advance, but it was practically contemporary to the crystal radio. Howard Armstrong received the patent for the regenerative receiver in 1914. He received the patent for the superheterodyne receiver in 1920. His superregenerative receiver patent was issued in 1922. His FM patent came significantly later. 19 years after Marconi spans the Atlantic, and there's a patent for the superheterodyne receiver. Considering that wasn't a way station towards future innovation, unlike the regenerative receiver, it came about a pretty long time ago. Broadcasting as we know it hadn't come about, if we listen to KDKA's claim of being the first. Unless you build a receiver using some early concept, you basically can't use a receiver without benefitting from Armstrong's work. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DXPEDITION REPORT: Grayland, WA, June 11-12 | Shortwave | |||
GRAYLAND 2004 FALL DXPEDITION: Compiled Logs for Oct 15-17 (Part 1) | Shortwave | |||
spurious signal in IC735 | General | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |