| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Carter - Last time I looked Rice was the Secretary of State.
|
Cuhulin - Just saw "BB" on TV with GHWB ~ RHF
. . . . . |
"Greg" wrote in message ... From: dxAce Organization: Wassamatta U. Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:52:24 -0400 Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans John Plimmer wrote: This is the headline from this BBC report http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4210674.stm I am proud to say that as a little old South African in a third world country at the Southern tip of darkest Africa we had a devastating flood in my little town in 2002. The skies had not even cleared from the raging storm when the air force choppers arrived in force. They rescued those in need, brought in emergency personnel and special riot police to prevent looting. Although the flood put out water supplies, washed away our connecting roads, power and sewerage systems, mighty teams of specialists arrived within hours and all services were restored within 48 hours except the roads that took a few days longer. The choppers brought in food until the roads were reconstructed. I felt very proud to be a South African at that time and was immensely grateful for the smooth running and super national rescue effort that took place seemingly so easily, like a well oiled machine. What happened to mighty America...??? Well, we're still here... and guess what? You're still in a third world country that can't take care of it's own problems... do a Google on AIDS or a host of other problems. And guess where your little third world country has begged in the past? The USA. Guess where it will continue to beg in the future? The USA. We'll be OK... I can't really say the same for South Africa. What did the Federal Emergency Management Agency do...??? Exactly what they're supposed to do, considering the enormity of the problem. Heads should roll for this debacle - it is inexcusable in a superpower with all America's vast resources. I guess we'll have to decide that issue. It certainly won't be up to you or a third world country like South Africa to decide whether heads should or will roll. Have a pleasant evening. dxAce Michigan USA Um, Jack, you gotta realize that if you criticize our country a lot of people, like the Drakeman, are going to get ****ed. You're going to catch a lot of heat. It's the "our country is better than your country" attitude. The truth is, the enormity of the problem is more than the emergency agencies had ever planned for and they are still, at this late date, having trouble getting their arms around it. The lack of leadership, starting with the president and FEMA head Michael Brown is so appalling that even conservatives are calling for their heads. The Prez, probably at the urging of his handlers, cancelled his vacation and flew over the hurricane ravaged Gulf Coast. After considerable criticism he started making more appearances on camera with other federal and local officials, with lots of back-slapping and promises. But relief is slow and sporatic. Michael Brown admitted on a television interview that he was unaware that 20,000 people had been told to go to the convention center and wait for help. They were abandodned there for days without food & water. He said in the interview he would take immediate action. It was several days before help finally arrived. Michael Brown belongs in prison. Despite what the right-wing apologists on this NG might tell you, the truth is if Bush were running for re-election he would be soundly defeated, as a result of his lack of leadership in this enormous tragedy as well as dissatisfaction with his handling of the Iraq situation in the opinion of the majority of Americans. Brace yourself - gratuitous flaming to follow. Greg Morning Greg And how the head leader of "HomeLand Security" Michael Chertoff that the bow legged hick put in charge. Even Bill O Reilly said this guy should be fired. He had "no idea" what was going on even though it was ALL OVER THE TV ON EVERY CHANNEL and ON THE FRONT PAGE OF EVERY NEWPAPER. He had "no idea" people were abandoned in the Superdome. Of course, we know he is a blatant liar like his boss bush. That has to be the lamest excuse I ever heard. Everybody knew what was going on in NO, BUT, the HEAD of our "Homeland Security" didn't know what was going on. If it's true he's the most inept moron in the world in charge of our protection. If it's a lie, he is still the most inept moron in charge of your families protection but is also a biggot and doesn't actually believe in his faith. Gee I thought bush {Flight Suit Man} only appointed "righteous" people?? What this event did is show the world and terrorists that the bush administration is totally inept, nothing but "talk", all about bull****, nothing to back themselves up, no leadership, no proper critical communications in an emergency and how they view their own poor people. The terrorists see a target that will collapse under easy conditions. Much easier then they thought. This event taught them much thanks to bush and his appointed buddies. Now YOU ARE THE TARGET EVEN MORE then before. I am embarrassed by bush and his total administration. Yes embarrassed by the rest of the world. G-D forbid if this was a terrorist attack of the deadly kind. A bio or dirty bomb and bush would go hide in some bunker along with cheney and his gay buddy Rove. As you can see, Homeland Security is nothing but a shame put on to impress dunmmies like dxace, beerbrain,jd and their kind. You see, they believe it truly exists and works. They don't think this is major catastrophe in itself besides the hurricane. They see nothing else but "bad weather". Amazing isn't it. Yes, people around the world and the terrorists see who we really are and how we act under chaos and confusion under this administration. The hurricane happened on Monday.I still can't believe that Chertoff had the audacity, the lack of respect for the Americans people intelligence, to say on Thurs he had NO IDEA that people were stranded in the Superdome with NO FOOD, WATER, MEDICINES OR SECURITY. So by Thurs, the leader, head honcho of our "Homeland Security said, "I had no idea" blah blah blah.... Now go be good blobs of human waste and have another beer while wearing your Radio cap and living off the public. Lucky |
I just heard on local radio that at this time,only emergency personel
and utility workers will be allowed South of the Railroad tracks in Gulfport.There is a gas leak South of the Railroad tracks.Gulfport and Biloxi are NOT gone,they are coming back. cuhulin |
"Mark Zenier" wrote in message ... In article , Greg wrote: Oh yeah? You obviously didn't catch Cigar Dave yesterday (12:00 noon EDT, 970am, Tampa)! He's a conservative, Republican, Bush supporter who was so hot with criticism he was lit at both ends. Seriously, a common theme I'm hearing on conservative radio talk shows, as well as the opinion mongers n the "liberal" mainstream media is that FEMA, Homeland Security, and everyone up the food chain to POTUS his-very-self, are ill-prepared and slow to react. This bodes ill for any more catastrophes, natural or terrorist-made, in the future. I've got a couple of questions? 1. How exaggerated was the TV coverage of the sniping? How many incidents, and what areas were actually effected? 2. Did the media coveage cause the FEMA executives to shut down access to New Orleans on the grounds of safety? If not safety, why? And why where highway style busses needed to evacuate the Superdome? Wouldn't a "Dunkirk with Dumptrucks" have worked several days earlier? (Who go the contract to provide the busses?) 3. Would a lot of this not have happened this way if federal bureaucrats were banned from watching any 24 hour cable news channels? CNN lost all credibilty with me during the coverage of the First Gulf War that the local TV stations were rebroadcasting. Sloppy, overdramatic, inaccurate, and STUPID. And to get FOX news, just add a large factor of blatant lying and partisan propaganda. They're not news, they're a form of "Reality TV" where the news editors and meat puppets out in the field are making up a "story" to add drama to real events. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) Yes Mark, Fox news to me is a gov't channel. They do lie, make money by exploiting the dead, make believe they are against a lot of things bush and his administration does, but they do that to gain more audience by not alienating the left completely. This means more hits for them to show companies for commercials which means higher rates and more cash in their greedy little pockets. The hand pick their employees just right. Are they "on our side"? Do they have believable and trusting faces? Can they lie good? Are they true republican supporters? It's funny how O Reilly exploits whatever and whomever he can. But did he talk about the new eminent domain laws? NO Did he talk about Jeff Gannon, the homosexual G.I. hooker and prostitute who had security clearance to enter and roam the White House at his own will? NO he never covered the topic. Never. IF this was done by Democratics, you KNOW how he would have talked about it for weeks in a row. Look how they covered Clinton and his little affair? Can you just imagine what these holy right wingers would have done with this story were it Dems who did it?? The media in this country is tightly controlled. They are owned and run by highly motivated political power players like Rupert Murdoch. News Corp and Fox news for example. Take our radio stations. The majority are run by a couple companies and people with political connections. You can't get the real truth anymore. At least on SW you can get some real views by outside governments who are NOT SCARED of bush and his power connections. Good for them. But, as David stated here once, they are trying to do away with that source of info too. Lucky |
"Carter-K8VT" wrote in message ... You're reading waaay too much into this...let me try to summarize: 1) The *original* poster made the comment that W and Condi were gadding about. 2) *You* then posted that Slick Willy was gadding about. 3) *I* then posted that your comment about Slick Willy was not germane to the conversation because he, by virtue of being a plain citizen, is in charge of nothing. -=jd=- wrote: Then what's your point? My point is that your comment about Slick Willy was a non sequitur. Simple. Nothing more, nothing less. Get it now? He doesn't know **how to get it. He doesn't see it, feel it, or understand what you are trying to say to him. Waste of time IMO but I think you're astute enough to find that out on your own. He used that on me too. He has nothing of substance to say in his defense of the topic. So, he pulls whatever he can out of his ass, not his brain. Next, he'll be attacking you personally. Lucky |
What we need is nienty nine point nienty nine percent LESS govt.Starting
from the top level down.They should ALL be FIRED.So,I wonder where bush will be having his stupid staged Photo Ops today? I hope he stays OUT! of Mississippi so Mississippi can get on with rebuilding after Katrina. cuhulin |
Lucky wrote: "Greg" wrote in message ... From: dxAce Organization: Wassamatta U. Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:52:24 -0400 Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans John Plimmer wrote: This is the headline from this BBC report http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4210674.stm I am proud to say that as a little old South African in a third world country at the Southern tip of darkest Africa we had a devastating flood in my little town in 2002. The skies had not even cleared from the raging storm when the air force choppers arrived in force. They rescued those in need, brought in emergency personnel and special riot police to prevent looting. Although the flood put out water supplies, washed away our connecting roads, power and sewerage systems, mighty teams of specialists arrived within hours and all services were restored within 48 hours except the roads that took a few days longer. The choppers brought in food until the roads were reconstructed. I felt very proud to be a South African at that time and was immensely grateful for the smooth running and super national rescue effort that took place seemingly so easily, like a well oiled machine. What happened to mighty America...??? Well, we're still here... and guess what? You're still in a third world country that can't take care of it's own problems... do a Google on AIDS or a host of other problems. And guess where your little third world country has begged in the past? The USA. Guess where it will continue to beg in the future? The USA. We'll be OK... I can't really say the same for South Africa. What did the Federal Emergency Management Agency do...??? Exactly what they're supposed to do, considering the enormity of the problem. Heads should roll for this debacle - it is inexcusable in a superpower with all America's vast resources. I guess we'll have to decide that issue. It certainly won't be up to you or a third world country like South Africa to decide whether heads should or will roll. Have a pleasant evening. dxAce Michigan USA Um, Jack, you gotta realize that if you criticize our country a lot of people, like the Drakeman, are going to get ****ed. You're going to catch a lot of heat. It's the "our country is better than your country" attitude. The truth is, the enormity of the problem is more than the emergency agencies had ever planned for and they are still, at this late date, having trouble getting their arms around it. The lack of leadership, starting with the president and FEMA head Michael Brown is so appalling that even conservatives are calling for their heads. The Prez, probably at the urging of his handlers, cancelled his vacation and flew over the hurricane ravaged Gulf Coast. After considerable criticism he started making more appearances on camera with other federal and local officials, with lots of back-slapping and promises. But relief is slow and sporatic. Michael Brown admitted on a television interview that he was unaware that 20,000 people had been told to go to the convention center and wait for help. They were abandodned there for days without food & water. He said in the interview he would take immediate action. It was several days before help finally arrived. Michael Brown belongs in prison. Despite what the right-wing apologists on this NG might tell you, the truth is if Bush were running for re-election he would be soundly defeated, as a result of his lack of leadership in this enormous tragedy as well as dissatisfaction with his handling of the Iraq situation in the opinion of the majority of Americans. Brace yourself - gratuitous flaming to follow. Greg Morning Greg And how the head leader of "HomeLand Security" Michael Chertoff that the bow legged hick put in charge. Even Bill O Reilly said this guy should be fired. He had "no idea" what was going on even though it was ALL OVER THE TV ON EVERY CHANNEL and ON THE FRONT PAGE OF EVERY NEWPAPER. He had "no idea" people were abandoned in the Superdome. Of course, we know he is a blatant liar like his boss bush. That has to be the lamest excuse I ever heard. Everybody knew what was going on in NO, BUT, the HEAD of our "Homeland Security" didn't know what was going on. If it's true he's the most inept moron in the world in charge of our protection. If it's a lie, he is still the most inept moron in charge of your families protection but is also a biggot and doesn't actually believe in his faith. Gee I thought bush {Flight Suit Man} only appointed "righteous" people?? What this event did is show the world and terrorists that the bush administration is totally inept, nothing but "talk", all about bull****, nothing to back themselves up, no leadership, no proper critical communications in an emergency and how they view their own poor people. The terrorists see a target that will collapse under easy conditions. Much easier then they thought. This event taught them much thanks to bush and his appointed buddies. Now YOU ARE THE TARGET EVEN MORE then before. I am embarrassed by bush and his total administration. Yes embarrassed by the rest of the world. G-D forbid if this was a terrorist attack of the deadly kind. A bio or dirty bomb and bush would go hide in some bunker along with cheney and his gay buddy Rove. As you can see, Homeland Security is nothing but a shame put on to impress dunmmies like dxace, beerbrain,jd and their kind. You see, they believe it truly exists and works. They don't think this is major catastrophe in itself besides the hurricane. They see nothing else but "bad weather". Amazing isn't it. Yes, people around the world and the terrorists see who we really are and how we act under chaos and confusion under this administration. The hurricane happened on Monday.I still can't believe that Chertoff had the audacity, the lack of respect for the Americans people intelligence, to say on Thurs he had NO IDEA that people were stranded in the Superdome with NO FOOD, WATER, MEDICINES OR SECURITY. So by Thurs, the leader, head honcho of our "Homeland Security said, "I had no idea" blah blah blah.... Now go be good blobs of human waste and have another beer while wearing your Radio cap and living off the public. The other day it was a Diego Garcia cap, today it's a radio cap. You are one delusional ****stain there boy! Now go take your meds and calm down. dxAce Michigan USA |
RHF wrote: Carter - Last time I looked Rice was the Secretary of State. . So... Tell Me "Carter" Is the City of New Orleans a Nation-State that requires her personal attention ? Or ar you just looking to blame some one in the Bush Administration who happens to be and African-America (Black) ? . Rice has no place in NO offering pronouncements on a domestic policy issue and being seen loading groceries into a pickup for photo op's. But Bush is quite adept at playing race cards as needed. Also look at the verbally challenged Light General Russell Honore who heads the rescue effort. Not a random choice imho. |
Lucky wrote: "Mark Zenier" wrote in message ... In article , Greg wrote: Oh yeah? You obviously didn't catch Cigar Dave yesterday (12:00 noon EDT, 970am, Tampa)! He's a conservative, Republican, Bush supporter who was so hot with criticism he was lit at both ends. Seriously, a common theme I'm hearing on conservative radio talk shows, as well as the opinion mongers n the "liberal" mainstream media is that FEMA, Homeland Security, and everyone up the food chain to POTUS his-very-self, are ill-prepared and slow to react. This bodes ill for any more catastrophes, natural or terrorist-made, in the future. I've got a couple of questions? 1. How exaggerated was the TV coverage of the sniping? How many incidents, and what areas were actually effected? 2. Did the media coveage cause the FEMA executives to shut down access to New Orleans on the grounds of safety? If not safety, why? And why where highway style busses needed to evacuate the Superdome? Wouldn't a "Dunkirk with Dumptrucks" have worked several days earlier? (Who go the contract to provide the busses?) 3. Would a lot of this not have happened this way if federal bureaucrats were banned from watching any 24 hour cable news channels? CNN lost all credibilty with me during the coverage of the First Gulf War that the local TV stations were rebroadcasting. Sloppy, overdramatic, inaccurate, and STUPID. And to get FOX news, just add a large factor of blatant lying and partisan propaganda. They're not news, they're a form of "Reality TV" where the news editors and meat puppets out in the field are making up a "story" to add drama to real events. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) Yes Mark, Fox news to me is a gov't channel. They do lie, make money by exploiting the dead, make believe they are against a lot of things bush and his administration does, but they do that to gain more audience by not alienating the left completely. This means more hits for them to show companies for commercials which means higher rates and more cash in their greedy little pockets. The hand pick their employees just right. Are they "on our side"? Do they have believable and trusting faces? Can they lie good? Are they true republican supporters? It's funny how O Reilly exploits whatever and whomever he can. But did he talk about the new eminent domain laws? NO Did he talk about Jeff Gannon, the homosexual G.I. hooker and prostitute who had security clearance to enter and roam the White House at his own will? NO he never covered the topic. Never. IF this was done by Democratics, you KNOW how he would have talked about it for weeks in a row. Look how they covered Clinton and his little affair? Can you just imagine what these holy right wingers would have done with this story were it Dems who did it?? The media in this country is tightly controlled. They are owned and run by highly motivated political power players like Rupert Murdoch. News Corp and Fox news for example. Take our radio stations. The majority are run by a couple companies and people with political connections. You can't get the real truth anymore. At least on SW you can get some real views by outside governments who are NOT SCARED of bush and his power connections. Good for them. But, as David stated here once, they are trying to do away with that source of info too. Calm down and take your meds. By the way, after that eBay debacle and the current bunch of crap you're spewing here, wouldn't you think it appropriate to change your name from "Lucky" to "Stupid"? Now run along and see if mommy will let you pretend you're playing with your radio. dxAce Michigan USA |
"John S." wrote: RHF wrote: Carter - Last time I looked Rice was the Secretary of State. . So... Tell Me "Carter" Is the City of New Orleans a Nation-State that requires her personal attention ? Or ar you just looking to blame some one in the Bush Administration who happens to be and African-America (Black) ? . Rice has no place in NO offering pronouncements on a domestic policy issue and being seen loading groceries into a pickup for photo op's. But Bush is quite adept at playing race cards as needed. Also look at the verbally challenged Light General Russell Honore who heads the rescue effort. Not a random choice imho. Honore seems to be getting things done... that'll really **** you liberal ****stains off won't it! dxAce Michigan USA |
dxAce wrote: "John S." wrote: RHF wrote: Carter - Last time I looked Rice was the Secretary of State. . So... Tell Me "Carter" Is the City of New Orleans a Nation-State that requires her personal attention ? Or ar you just looking to blame some one in the Bush Administration who happens to be and African-America (Black) ? . Rice has no place in NO offering pronouncements on a domestic policy issue and being seen loading groceries into a pickup for photo op's. But Bush is quite adept at playing race cards as needed. Also look at the verbally challenged Light General Russell Honore who heads the rescue effort. Not a random choice imho. Honore seems to be getting things done... that'll really **** you liberal ****stains off won't it! dxAce Michigan USA The work is getting done, but he isn't contributing much....other than being a figurehead |
"John S." wrote: dxAce wrote: "John S." wrote: RHF wrote: Carter - Last time I looked Rice was the Secretary of State. . So... Tell Me "Carter" Is the City of New Orleans a Nation-State that requires her personal attention ? Or ar you just looking to blame some one in the Bush Administration who happens to be and African-America (Black) ? . Rice has no place in NO offering pronouncements on a domestic policy issue and being seen loading groceries into a pickup for photo op's. But Bush is quite adept at playing race cards as needed. Also look at the verbally challenged Light General Russell Honore who heads the rescue effort. Not a random choice imho. Honore seems to be getting things done... that'll really **** you liberal ****stains off won't it! dxAce Michigan USA The work is getting done, but he isn't contributing much....other than being a figurehead That was an excellent ****stain answer! dxAce Michigan USA |
JohnS.,
|
-=jd=- wrote: On Tue 06 Sep 2005 11:55:58a, "Lucky" wrote in message : "Carter-K8VT" wrote in message ... You're reading waaay too much into this...let me try to summarize: 1) The *original* poster made the comment that W and Condi were gadding about. 2) *You* then posted that Slick Willy was gadding about. 3) *I* then posted that your comment about Slick Willy was not germane to the conversation because he, by virtue of being a plain citizen, is in charge of nothing. -=jd=- wrote: Then what's your point? My point is that your comment about Slick Willy was a non sequitur. Simple. Nothing more, nothing less. Get it now? He doesn't know **how to get it. He doesn't see it, feel it, or understand what you are trying to say to him. Waste of time IMO but I think you're astute enough to find that out on your own. Hmmmm... No substance or facts there... Just emotional outburst... He used that on me too. He has nothing of substance to say in his defense of the topic. So, he pulls whatever he can out of his ass, not his brain. Next, he'll be attacking you personally. Yet more emotional outburst, devoid of fact or substance. Yet, I have resoundingly spanked the allegations, complete with references and documentation. I know, you hate it wen I "muddy" the issue with the facts. Speaking of facts, you seem to be completely bereft of *any* facts and can only repeat emotional opinions concerning Bush's lack of playing the "I Feel Your Pain(c)" act. You have publicly demonstrated that you ONLY appreciate symbolism over substance. Your complaint is not that Bush was mugging for the cameras, but that he wasn't mugging for your preferred choice of cameras. You serve no purpose but to lump yourself into the same group who insist on playing the "Bash-Bush-Blame-Game" before the full body-count is even known. Enjoy your politicial sniping on the backs of the dead and homeless. I'm intrigued about these *photo ops*. Who are the photographs being taken by? Does the President *order* those photo's to be taken? Aren't the photo's being taken primarily by the liberal press? And if so, who is staging what, and who is actually *mugging*? dxAce Michigan USA |
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 15:35:14 -0400, dxAce
wrote: I personally think all you ****stain liberal 'tards should lay low (and take your meds). dxAce I think all you Commie *******s should die slowly and pinfully. So there. Nyah! |
Greg wrote: From: "-=jd=-" Organization: Little... If any... Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:06:26 GMT Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans On Tue 06 Sep 2005 05:18:30p, dxAce wrote in message : -=jd=- wrote: On Tue 06 Sep 2005 11:55:58a, "Lucky" wrote in message : "Carter-K8VT" wrote in message ... You're reading waaay too much into this...let me try to summarize: 1) The *original* poster made the comment that W and Condi were gadding about. 2) *You* then posted that Slick Willy was gadding about. 3) *I* then posted that your comment about Slick Willy was not germane to the conversation because he, by virtue of being a plain citizen, is in charge of nothing. -=jd=- wrote: Then what's your point? My point is that your comment about Slick Willy was a non sequitur. Simple. Nothing more, nothing less. Get it now? He doesn't know **how to get it. He doesn't see it, feel it, or understand what you are trying to say to him. Waste of time IMO but I think you're astute enough to find that out on your own. Hmmmm... No substance or facts there... Just emotional outburst... He used that on me too. He has nothing of substance to say in his defense of the topic. So, he pulls whatever he can out of his ass, not his brain. Next, he'll be attacking you personally. Yet more emotional outburst, devoid of fact or substance. Yet, I have resoundingly spanked the allegations, complete with references and documentation. I know, you hate it wen I "muddy" the issue with the facts. Speaking of facts, you seem to be completely bereft of *any* facts and can only repeat emotional opinions concerning Bush's lack of playing the "I Feel Your Pain(c)" act. You have publicly demonstrated that you ONLY appreciate symbolism over substance. Your complaint is not that Bush was mugging for the cameras, but that he wasn't mugging for your preferred choice of cameras. You serve no purpose but to lump yourself into the same group who insist on playing the "Bash-Bush-Blame-Game" before the full body-count is even known. Enjoy your politicial sniping on the backs of the dead and homeless. I'm intrigued about these *photo ops*. Who are the photographs being taken by? Does the President *order* those photo's to be taken? Aren't the photo's being taken primarily by the liberal press? And if so, who is staging what, and who is actually *mugging*? Apparently, they are forced to crop out the SOCOM operators who have the media at gun-point and are forcing them to so callously use their cameras to abuse the delicate sensitivities of the shrill, squealing, hand-wringing liberals. -=jd=- -- My Current Disposable Email: (Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly) I sure can't argue with a reasoned statement like that. jd, you're smarter than all of us. The POTUS is covered by a travelling press corps that goes wherever he goes. When he's on the road, the photogs in this press corps make up the "tight pool" and have the closest access to the POTUS. Local media are in the media pool which doesn't normally get as close as the tight pool. Whenever the prez makes a local appearance, it's news and is covered by all media. It's up to individual networks, stations, and papers whether or not they use it. It's up to the prez his-own-self what he says and how he acts. Presumably, the media is hoping he will say/do something of substance. Not likely, but they gotta be ready just in case. jd thinks the liberals want dubbya to make his lips quiver. He's said that about 49 times in the past 2 days. The people in NO want him to stop posing and get control of the situation. Haliburton wants Cheney to take control of the scene. Guess who wins! Who wins? Well certainly not you, ****stain. You've got loser written all over you. LMAO at the 'tard. But hey, it's good comedy that shows just how feeble minded you liberal pukes are. dxAce Michigan USA |
Fried chicken shortage due to hurricane. www.worldnetdaily.com No
white meat to fry,,,,,,, OK,let em roll. cuhulin |
What was that you said,Mr.Plimmer? Article at www.worldnetdaily.com
Shocked Africans Wonder at Slow Aid. cuhulin |
Check out that big picture at the top of the page at www.rense.com
MORON AWOL bush in the water with that Guitar. cuhulin |
|
Australian Wonders - Is New Orleans Another Spin On 9/11?
www.rense.com One guy said the Levee was blown.I dont know. cuhulin |
From: dxAce Organization: Wassamatta U. Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:47:22 -0400 Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans Greg wrote: From: "-=jd=-" Organization: Little... If any... Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:06:26 GMT Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans On Tue 06 Sep 2005 05:18:30p, dxAce wrote in message : -=jd=- wrote: On Tue 06 Sep 2005 11:55:58a, "Lucky" wrote in message : "Carter-K8VT" wrote in message ... You're reading waaay too much into this...let me try to summarize: 1) The *original* poster made the comment that W and Condi were gadding about. 2) *You* then posted that Slick Willy was gadding about. 3) *I* then posted that your comment about Slick Willy was not germane to the conversation because he, by virtue of being a plain citizen, is in charge of nothing. -=jd=- wrote: Then what's your point? My point is that your comment about Slick Willy was a non sequitur. Simple. Nothing more, nothing less. Get it now? He doesn't know **how to get it. He doesn't see it, feel it, or understand what you are trying to say to him. Waste of time IMO but I think you're astute enough to find that out on your own. Hmmmm... No substance or facts there... Just emotional outburst... He used that on me too. He has nothing of substance to say in his defense of the topic. So, he pulls whatever he can out of his ass, not his brain. Next, he'll be attacking you personally. Yet more emotional outburst, devoid of fact or substance. Yet, I have resoundingly spanked the allegations, complete with references and documentation. I know, you hate it wen I "muddy" the issue with the facts. Speaking of facts, you seem to be completely bereft of *any* facts and can only repeat emotional opinions concerning Bush's lack of playing the "I Feel Your Pain(c)" act. You have publicly demonstrated that you ONLY appreciate symbolism over substance. Your complaint is not that Bush was mugging for the cameras, but that he wasn't mugging for your preferred choice of cameras. You serve no purpose but to lump yourself into the same group who insist on playing the "Bash-Bush-Blame-Game" before the full body-count is even known. Enjoy your politicial sniping on the backs of the dead and homeless. I'm intrigued about these *photo ops*. Who are the photographs being taken by? Does the President *order* those photo's to be taken? Aren't the photo's being taken primarily by the liberal press? And if so, who is staging what, and who is actually *mugging*? Apparently, they are forced to crop out the SOCOM operators who have the media at gun-point and are forcing them to so callously use their cameras to abuse the delicate sensitivities of the shrill, squealing, hand-wringing liberals. -=jd=- -- My Current Disposable Email: (Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly) I sure can't argue with a reasoned statement like that. jd, you're smarter than all of us. The POTUS is covered by a travelling press corps that goes wherever he goes. When he's on the road, the photogs in this press corps make up the "tight pool" and have the closest access to the POTUS. Local media are in the media pool which doesn't normally get as close as the tight pool. Whenever the prez makes a local appearance, it's news and is covered by all media. It's up to individual networks, stations, and papers whether or not they use it. It's up to the prez his-own-self what he says and how he acts. Presumably, the media is hoping he will say/do something of substance. Not likely, but they gotta be ready just in case. jd thinks the liberals want dubbya to make his lips quiver. He's said that about 49 times in the past 2 days. The people in NO want him to stop posing and get control of the situation. Haliburton wants Cheney to take control of the scene. Guess who wins! Who wins? Well certainly not you, ****stain. You've got loser written all over you. LMAO at the 'tard. But hey, it's good comedy that shows just how feeble minded you liberal pukes are. dxAce Michigan USA You got me there Drakeman. I'm not surprised you missed the point, but don't feel embarrassed. Just blurt out some nasty words and the usual crowd will laugh, just like in junior high school, eh? Happy DX, Greg |
Greg wrote: From: dxAce Organization: Wassamatta U. Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:47:22 -0400 Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans Greg wrote: From: "-=jd=-" Organization: Little... If any... Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:06:26 GMT Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans On Tue 06 Sep 2005 05:18:30p, dxAce wrote in message : -=jd=- wrote: On Tue 06 Sep 2005 11:55:58a, "Lucky" wrote in message : "Carter-K8VT" wrote in message ... You're reading waaay too much into this...let me try to summarize: 1) The *original* poster made the comment that W and Condi were gadding about. 2) *You* then posted that Slick Willy was gadding about. 3) *I* then posted that your comment about Slick Willy was not germane to the conversation because he, by virtue of being a plain citizen, is in charge of nothing. -=jd=- wrote: Then what's your point? My point is that your comment about Slick Willy was a non sequitur. Simple. Nothing more, nothing less. Get it now? He doesn't know **how to get it. He doesn't see it, feel it, or understand what you are trying to say to him. Waste of time IMO but I think you're astute enough to find that out on your own. Hmmmm... No substance or facts there... Just emotional outburst... He used that on me too. He has nothing of substance to say in his defense of the topic. So, he pulls whatever he can out of his ass, not his brain. Next, he'll be attacking you personally. Yet more emotional outburst, devoid of fact or substance. Yet, I have resoundingly spanked the allegations, complete with references and documentation. I know, you hate it wen I "muddy" the issue with the facts. Speaking of facts, you seem to be completely bereft of *any* facts and can only repeat emotional opinions concerning Bush's lack of playing the "I Feel Your Pain(c)" act. You have publicly demonstrated that you ONLY appreciate symbolism over substance. Your complaint is not that Bush was mugging for the cameras, but that he wasn't mugging for your preferred choice of cameras. You serve no purpose but to lump yourself into the same group who insist on playing the "Bash-Bush-Blame-Game" before the full body-count is even known. Enjoy your politicial sniping on the backs of the dead and homeless. I'm intrigued about these *photo ops*. Who are the photographs being taken by? Does the President *order* those photo's to be taken? Aren't the photo's being taken primarily by the liberal press? And if so, who is staging what, and who is actually *mugging*? Apparently, they are forced to crop out the SOCOM operators who have the media at gun-point and are forcing them to so callously use their cameras to abuse the delicate sensitivities of the shrill, squealing, hand-wringing liberals. -=jd=- -- My Current Disposable Email: (Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly) I sure can't argue with a reasoned statement like that. jd, you're smarter than all of us. The POTUS is covered by a travelling press corps that goes wherever he goes. When he's on the road, the photogs in this press corps make up the "tight pool" and have the closest access to the POTUS. Local media are in the media pool which doesn't normally get as close as the tight pool. Whenever the prez makes a local appearance, it's news and is covered by all media. It's up to individual networks, stations, and papers whether or not they use it. It's up to the prez his-own-self what he says and how he acts. Presumably, the media is hoping he will say/do something of substance. Not likely, but they gotta be ready just in case. jd thinks the liberals want dubbya to make his lips quiver. He's said that about 49 times in the past 2 days. The people in NO want him to stop posing and get control of the situation. Haliburton wants Cheney to take control of the scene. Guess who wins! Who wins? Well certainly not you, ****stain. You've got loser written all over you. LMAO at the 'tard. But hey, it's good comedy that shows just how feeble minded you liberal pukes are. dxAce Michigan USA You got me there Drakeman. I'm not surprised you missed the point, but don't feel embarrassed. I didn't miss a thing, ****stain... and I'm certainly not embarassed. Just blurt out some nasty words and the usual crowd will laugh, just like in junior high school, eh? Best get your dumbass off to class, boy. Happy DX, It's always happy dx here. dxAce Michigan USA |
From: dxAce Organization: Wassamatta U. Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:01:51 -0400 Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans Best get your dumbass off to class, boy. Happy DX, It's always happy dx here. dxAce Michigan USA Drakeman, I think you take things too personally. You need to chill. I've managed to dodge your wrath for nearly two years on this newsgroup, and now I get tagged "tard", "****stain" (I especially like that one!) and "dumbass" in one swell foop! A trifecta! Thanks for the consideration! Greg |
Greg wrote: From: dxAce Organization: Wassamatta U. Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:01:51 -0400 Subject: New Orleans crisis shames Americans Best get your dumbass off to class, boy. Happy DX, It's always happy dx here. dxAce Michigan USA Drakeman, I think you take things too personally. No, I look at things realistically. Now run along and post your 'president posing' and the 'Halliburton-Cheney' crap somewhere else. dxAce Michigan USA |
On 8 Sep 2005 07:48:04 -0700, "John S." wrote:
At some point the experts have to ask the tough questions: Does it make sense to rebuild the residential portions of New Orleans. Are they really fit places for long term human habitation. I don't think they are. There's that famous American can-do attitude... |
Boy's lemonaid stand raises $1,000. www.worldnetdaily.com City
A..holes come along and tell them y'all don't have a license and shut it down and then the "cops" put handcuffs on them and zapp them with stun guns and throw them in the slammer and they shoot and kill the kid's dogs and stomp their cats to death. www.devilfinder.com police CORRUPTION cuhulin |
If you will back track far enough in this news group thingy,you will see
where I said (in effect) that there will be a time when New Orleans will seriously have to think about rebuilding further North on higher and dry land. cuhulin |
Does it make any sense for them people on the Coastal areas of U.S.A.to
have inshorance so they can rebuild their luverly beach front homes and or beach front vacation homes? People are stupid and I am one of them stupid peoples too.What if a tornado destroyed my home? I do have inshorance on my home.Should I rebuild if my home gets knocked down? hastert would say,NO! cuhulin |
CAN DO is Right.Us Americans Own The World and outer Space too.
cuhulin |
I forgot what time it is.I need to head on over to the Goodwill
store.CAN DO! cuhulin |
|
I am older than I think I am.I am only sixty three years young.I have
been told before I act more like I am three years old. cuhulin |
I am going to one of my other webtv username thingys and look at some of
them purty wimmins on there now.They think I am a woman,but I am not.I find out lots of juicey dirt that way.grin cuhulin |
On 8 Sep 2005 10:59:17 -0700, "John S." wrote:
wrote: Does it make any sense for them people on the Coastal areas of U.S.A.to have inshorance so they can rebuild their luverly beach front homes and or beach front vacation homes? People are stupid and I am one of them stupid peoples too.What if a tornado destroyed my home? I do have inshorance on my home.Should I rebuild if my home gets knocked down? hastert would say,NO! cuhulin Where there is are clearly defined problems that won't go away I agree. But lets take the risky localities one at a time. In New Orleans there are several problems that I don't see an easy resolution for: Built below water level Surrounded by water In an area frequented by hurricanes Continues to sink further below water level Ocean level rising Water supply is polluted for many years A population that can't or won't get itself out of harms way Scrape the contaminated muck off the surface, mix with water and pump into depleted oil wells. |
People of New Orleans have weathered Hurricanes before for hundreds of
years,water everywhere and high winds.Some of them didn't know Katrina was going to be that windy.It was not Hurricane Katrina that flooded about eighty percent of New Orleans.It was the breaches in the Levees and I believe there is something awfully fishy about that.I do NOT believe Katrina had anything to do at all with the breaches in the Levees.Spinning does NOT!!! work with me! cuhulin |
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com