In article ,
Brian Running wrote:

Gee I make one OT post and you hit the roof. Why don't you kick
some of these other OT poster in the balls Brian? BTW I've posted
more shortwave content here than you ever have or will and I'm damn
sure my involvement in the hobby extends beyond yours.

Nobody hit the roof, Brian. I enjoy your radio-related posts, and
you seem like a genuinely good guy. My point is, I'd hate to see you
become like the paranoiac, delusional, political loonies that infest
this group. Your post had more than a little bit of that tone in it.

I assure you that your involvement in the radio hobby is far greater
than mine. I had a novice license in the early '70s, and never went
any further than that in ham radio. Nowadays, I listen primarily to
utility stuff via a couple of little Radio Shack portables. Just
about anybody here is more into radio than I am. But, we really
don't need any more right-wing American loonies in this group, know
what I mean?

The off topic loonies of which the political posts comprise a great
deal of it is about 2/3'rds of the posts. I don't see that changing
unless someone goes after them.

You expect people to go off topic occasionally but there is a small
group people here that posts off topic all the time or very close to
it.

Your level of involvement in short wave is not the issue it's what you
post here in the news group.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

We don't need any more left wing loonies either!

I agree, whole-heartedly.

"Brian Hill" wrote in message
...

"FDR" wrote in message Hmmm,
when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies.
As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on
conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on
liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there.

Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read
the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it!

Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who
wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to
NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about
stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC.


B.H.

FDR wrote:

"Brian Hill" wrote in message
...

"FDR" wrote in message Hmmm,
when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies.
As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on
conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on
liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there.

Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read
the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it!

Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who
wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to
NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about
stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC.

You got something against the flag, ****stain? The RNC is free to hold their
convention anywhere they choose, ****stain. Shadow? As far as I know the WTC was
no longer capable of casting a shadow at that time, ****stain.

Continue to tote and whine, ****stain!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 15:37:17 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



FDR wrote:

"Brian Hill" wrote in message
...

"FDR" wrote in message Hmmm,
when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies.
As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on
conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are on
liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there.

Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read
the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny it!

Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who
wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to
NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about
stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC.

You got something against the flag, ****stain? The RNC is free to hold their
convention anywhere they choose, ****stain. Shadow? As far as I know the WTC was
no longer capable of casting a shadow at that time, ****stain.

Thanks for demonstrating your lack of perception for anything
not precisely literal, cumstain.

Bring on the totes, 'tards and canucks, you lame snatch.

Continue to tote and whine, ****stain!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"Brian Hill" wrote in message
...

"FDR" wrote in message Hmmm,
when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies.
As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on
conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are
on
liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there.

Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read
the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny
it!

Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who
wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to
NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about
stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC.

You got something against the flag, ****stain?

I'm tired of Bush desecrating it so he can get votes.

The RNC is free to hold their
convention anywhere they choose, ****stain.

Yep, and they freely chose it in a place for poltical gain. It's not my
fault you can't see it, or have been brainwashed by the RNC to not see it.


Shadow? As far as I know the WTC was
no longer capable of casting a shadow at that time, ****stain.

Continue to tote and whine, ****stain!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"Brian Hill" wrote in message
...

"FDR" wrote in message Hmmm,
when you said victims and 9/11 I thought you meant the dead bodies.
As I recall, victims (those that survived 9/11) were shown on
conservative and liberal tv stations. And the victims (refugees) are
on
liberal and conservative tv. So I don't think you have a point there.

Yes I do. You *******s were going to show them for political gain. Read
the post. You know you'll do what it takes to get your way. Don't deny
it!

Please don't yammer about political gain when you've got a President who
wraps himself in the flag every chance he gets, and has a RNC who goes to
NYC for their nominating convention to trout out their rehtoric about
stopping terrorism in the shadow of the WTC.

You got something against the flag, ****stain?

I'm tired of Bush desecrating it so he can get votes.

When has President Bush *desecrated* the flag?


The RNC is free to hold their
convention anywhere they choose, ****stain.

Yep, and they freely chose it in a place for poltical gain. It's not my
fault you can't see it, or have been brainwashed by the RNC to not see it.

Well at least I've not been brainwashed by the DNC!

Shadow? As far as I know the WTC was
no longer capable of casting a shadow at that time, ****stain.

Continue to tote and whine, ****stain!

dxAce
Michigan
USA