OT Toxins At Ground Below Zero Coverup
 

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html

"David" wrote in message
...
http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html


HAHA. Right from Air America to Buzzflash. Once again the loony left trying
to make something out of nothing. Floodwaters in NO polluted? No, really?
Duh!

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:55:40 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:



"David" wrote in message
.. .
http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html


HAHA. Right from Air America to Buzzflash. Once again the loony left trying
to make something out of nothing. Floodwaters in NO polluted? No, really?
Duh!


It appears to have slipped under the radar at Weird Nut Daily...

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:15:50 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


On Tue 13 Sep 2005 09:58:46p, David wrote in message
:

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html


Hmmm... Googling +"Katrina" +"toxin" tends to indicate that practically
*everyone* is aware of, and has reported, the toxic soup in NOLA, to include
(but not limited to) the big-4 MSM outlets, blogs, nuts, amateurs, hobbyists,
etc.

-=jd=-
The EPA mystery man says the toxins pose a more severe hazard, like
the Pile after 9-11, where the Agency also lied about the relative
safety.

How many after hurricanes (and otherwise non after hurricanes
situations) toxic grounds areas have been cleaned up and then put back
into good use.I know of at least one,Mississippi Gulf Coast after
hurricane Camille of 1969.And I don't know for sure but I don't think
Halliburton and Bechtel and Kellog,Brown & Root were doing the
rebuilding or most of the rebuilding either.
cuhulin

-=jd=- wrote:

On Wed 14 Sep 2005 06:02:40p, David wrote in message
:

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:15:50 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


On Tue 13 Sep 2005 09:58:46p, David wrote in message
m:

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributor.../con05330.html


Hmmm... Googling +"Katrina" +"toxin" tends to indicate that practically
*everyone* is aware of, and has reported, the toxic soup in NOLA, to
include (but not limited to) the big-4 MSM outlets, blogs, nuts,
amateurs, hobbyists, etc.

-=jd=-

The EPA mystery man says the toxins pose a more severe hazard, like
the Pile after 9-11, where the Agency also lied about the relative
safety.


He's one guy with an opinion that's akin to arguing which is worse: being
shot in the head once or three times. His opinion really doesn't matter, as
I don't think anyone's treating it lightly, regardless of the *severity*
of the toxicity. It seems everyone treating it as if it was the worst.

I find it difficult to understand why you're burning cycles trying to read
significance into that, when there is something far more worthy of your
angst:

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/12637172.htm
Chertoff delayed federal response, memo shows

"...Chertoff's Aug. 30 memo for the first time declared Katrina an
"Incident of National Significance," a key designation that triggers swift
federal coordination. The following afternoon, Bush met with his Cabinet,
then appeared before TV cameras in the White House Rose Garden to announce
the government's planned action..."

Apparently, there has been an increase in federal authority, under certain
circumstances, with the current NRP.

You may now commence running in circles & screaming that the sky is
falling.

Will he say that we're really, really, really doomed now?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:14:48 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

He's one guy with an opinion that's akin to arguing which is worse: being
shot in the head once or three times. His opinion really doesn't matter, as
I don't think anyone's treating it lightly, regardless of the *severity*
of the toxicity. It seems everyone treating it as if it was the worst.

Opinion? Where do you see opinion? This is eyewitness testimony.

''Hugh Kauffman, a Senior Policy Analyst at the Environmental
Protection Agency who specializes in emergency response, told Morning
Sedition hosts Marc Maron and Mark Riley that a government cover-up is
taking place right now, as we speak, to hide information about the
dangerous toxins in the flood waters of the Gulf Coast region.
Kauffman, a 35-year EPA veteran who has served in Republican and
Democratic administrations, says that the Bush administration is
preventing the EPA from releasing information that oil and chemical
companies are mandated by law to provide. Kauffman says the Bush
administration’s cover-up is endangering residents and relief workers
throughout the Gulf Coast region, who are being exposed to dangerous
levels of toxins, some of which have been proven to cause cancer and
birth defects. Kauffman, who was the chief investigator for the 9/11
clean up, also said that the Bush administration engaged in the same
practice after 9/11—covering up the truth about the dangers in the air
and water and lying to the public in the weeks after the disaster.
Kauffman said that over 75% of the heroes who responded to 9/11 have
gotten sick and in some cases have died because of exposure to toxins
at Ground Zero, and that he fears a similar fate will befall relief
workers and residents in the Gulf Coast now.''

David wrote:

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:14:48 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

He's one guy with an opinion that's akin to arguing which is worse: being
shot in the head once or three times. His opinion really doesn't matter, as
I don't think anyone's treating it lightly, regardless of the *severity*
of the toxicity. It seems everyone treating it as if it was the worst.

Opinion? Where do you see opinion? This is eyewitness testimony.

''Hugh Kauffman, a Senior Policy Analyst at the Environmental
Protection Agency who specializes in emergency response, told Morning
Sedition hosts Marc Maron and Mark Riley that a government cover-up is
taking place right now, as we speak, to hide information about the
dangerous toxins in the flood waters of the Gulf Coast region.
Kauffman, a 35-year EPA veteran who has served in Republican and
Democratic administrations, says that the Bush administration is
preventing the EPA from releasing information that oil and chemical
companies are mandated by law to provide. Kauffman says the Bush
administration’s cover-up is endangering residents and relief workers
throughout the Gulf Coast region, who are being exposed to dangerous
levels of toxins, some of which have been proven to cause cancer and
birth defects. Kauffman, who was the chief investigator for the 9/11
clean up, also said that the Bush administration engaged in the same
practice after 9/11—covering up the truth about the dangers in the air
and water and lying to the public in the weeks after the disaster.
Kauffman said that over 75% of the heroes who responded to 9/11 have
gotten sick and in some cases have died because of exposure to toxins
at Ground Zero, and that he fears a similar fate will befall relief
workers and residents in the Gulf Coast now.''

How many times a day do you experience fecal incontinence?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:24:40 -0400, dxAce
wrote:




Will he say that we're really, really, really doomed now?

You figure it out. You're a pretty fart smeller. This example pretty
much sums things up.

''I prosecute polluters on behalf of the Natural Resources Defense
Council, Riverkeeper and Waterkeeper Alliance. As George W. Bush began
his presidency, I was involved in litigation against the factory-pork
industry, which is a large source of air and water pollution in
America. Corporate pork factories cannot produce more efficiently than
traditional family farmers without violating several federal
environmental statutes. Industrial farms illegally dump millions of
tons of untreated fecal and toxic waste onto land and into the air and
water. Factory farms have contaminated hundreds of miles of waterways,
put tens of thousands of family farmers and fishermen out of work,
killed billions of fish, sickened consumers and subjected millions of
farm animals to unspeakable cruelty''
-RFK Jr.

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1120-01.htm

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:43:50 -0400, dxAce
wrote:


How many times a day do you experience fecal incontinence?

I have my **** together.