Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:55:58 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: I keep hearing on the news about the massive failure in communications after Katrina (and they're also talking about the same thing after 9/11). My question is... are these people completely clueless? Don't they have engineers that they can talk to? In the case of 9/11, where were the repeaters for the fire/police/etc? On top of the WTC towers... and those lost power when the planes hit (at least the upper floors), ergo, no comms. And they certainly weren't working after the towers fell. Now, I may be in error about the location of their repeaters, these may have been elsewhere (the only other real choice would be the Empire State Building), but again, walkie talkies don't work well inside of concrete buildings.. range would be spotty at best. They're talking about needing more spectrum for comms. Under those conditions, no amount of additional spectrum space would make a whit of difference. This goes double or more for New Orleans. They could have all the spectrum space in the world, but if the infrastructure to run it (electrical power, antenna systems, etc.) is destroyed, it would avail them not at all. One of the problems with UHF and VHF two way communications is that the antennas need to be as high as possible, which makes them prime targets for hurricane force winds. There are locat tactical frequencies that allow on scene personnel to talk to one another, but those are very limited in range, and furthermore the chargers for those handie talkies are sitting back at the station which has no power, or limited time on generator power. Maybe satellite coms are the answer, get away from terrestrial linkups that are more fallible. And you can stuff a lot of PS comms on a single 72MHz wide Ku band transponder. So much for my little rant.. I just can't believe they're griping about the government not doing enough to insure comms during an emergency, when in some emergencies, such as a hurricane, tornado, or terrorist bombing, the comms infrastructure may be the first thing to go, and there's not a hell of a lot you can do about it. Would you PLEASE stop confusing the issue with the facts!!!!! Everyone knows it's Bush's fault. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How dense can they all be? | Shortwave |