DaviD - nazi,,, Nazi... NAZI ! ! !
Ah ! - Another Expert Opinion by DaviD

SeeingEyeDog wrote:
You obviously are not aware of the "terror" that Muhamid followers bestowed
upon the non-Islamic population of the M.E. during the birth of Islam.

You just tried to change the arguement in a desperate attempt to win
debating points. The Moslems did not take up the Cross and go
Crusading. What I wrote was correct.

The expansion of Islam was no bloodier than other conquests from that
era, and their relatively small numbers forced the Saracens to be less
bloodthirsty than the Visigoths, Goths, Vandals, Lmobars, Suevi,
Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Norsemen, etc. Many (most?) Christian
communities in north Africa and the Levant certanly survived and
thrived under Fatimites and the Hamdanids. You have been taken in by
the Crusader propaganda.

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:51:49 GMT, David wrote:

On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:41:40 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:


Some of my friends were killed by Atheist terrorists!

"Sherman" wrote in message
. ..
Some of my friends were killed by Christian terrorists.


One thing you do not see, Nazi, is atheist sects fighting one another.

Okay folks - we have a "Godwin" ; thread closed.

SeeingEyeDog wrote:
Furthermore, when has it become legal for the Socialists to steal my
property tax monies to fund their Socialist/Communist agenda? I have the
freedom to choose where I wish to send my children to school. If I choose
not to participate in the "Public Socialist School" experiment I demand that
MY property tax monies not be confiscated for the funding of THEIR Socialist
agenda. I want government OUT OF THE EDUCATION SYSTEM, period!

The United States is a representative republic. This was clearly the
original intent of the founding fathers. You have the right to
petition the government to change the laws that you do not like. If
the majority of the legislature does not agree with you, you can either
continue to work for change, you can leave the country, or you can
whine like a crybaby.

On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 12:16:13 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:


Furthermore, when has it become legal for the Socialists to steal my
property tax monies to fund their Socialist/Communist agenda? I have the
freedom to choose where I wish to send my children to school. If I choose
not to participate in the "Public Socialist School" experiment I demand that
MY property tax monies not be confiscated for the funding of THEIR Socialist
agenda. I want government OUT OF THE EDUCATION SYSTEM, period!

Let those who choose Socialist indoctrination pay for it!

You will then see how quickly the Socialist school system collapses. Just
as all Socialist systems have collapsed throughout history. But you see,
the Socialists know they must continue the tax robbery to keep their agenda
viable and will use any underhanded legal argument to perpetuate the lie.
And so it is, they place you in the position to cut your own throat. That
is called "Suicidalism". [See the original post of this thread.]

The public school system is there to insure that we have an educated
electorate who are skilled consumers of news and current events.
Skilled news consumers make better voters.

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 11:19:37 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:51:49 GMT, David wrote:

On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:41:40 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:


Some of my friends were killed by Atheist terrorists!

"Sherman" wrote in message
...
Some of my friends were killed by Christian terrorists.


One thing you do not see, Nazi, is atheist sects fighting one another.

Okay folks - we have a "Godwin" ; thread closed.
Godwin some kind of Neocon apologist?

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 11:19:37 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:51:49 GMT, David wrote:

On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:41:40 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:


Some of my friends were killed by Atheist terrorists!

"Sherman" wrote in message
...
Some of my friends were killed by Christian terrorists.


One thing you do not see, Nazi, is atheist sects fighting one another.

Okay folks - we have a "Godwin" ; thread closed.
I don't believe in God win.

You are simply trying to distinguish a difference. There is no difference.
Both Islam and Christianity had their murderous "Crusades" - semantics.

The point is Islam continues on with its murderous "Crusades".
Whether you wish to delineate the semantics or not is irrelevant.

wrote in message
oups.com...
SeeingEyeDog wrote:
You obviously are not aware of the "terror" that Muhamid followers
bestowed
upon the non-Islamic population of the M.E. during the birth of Islam.

You just tried to change the arguement in a desperate attempt to win
debating points. The Moslems did not take up the Cross and go
Crusading. What I wrote was correct.

The expansion of Islam was no bloodier than other conquests from that
era, and their relatively small numbers forced the Saracens to be less
bloodthirsty than the Visigoths, Goths, Vandals, Lmobars, Suevi,
Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Norsemen, etc. Many (most?) Christian
communities in north Africa and the Levant certanly survived and
thrived under Fatimites and the Hamdanids. You have been taken in by
the Crusader propaganda.

SeeingEyeDog wrote:
(a bunch of nonsene)

'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, 'it
means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less.' -- Lewis
Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:53:14 GMT, David wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 11:19:37 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:51:49 GMT, David wrote:

On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:41:40 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:


Some of my friends were killed by Atheist terrorists!

"Sherman" wrote in message
m...
Some of my friends were killed by Christian terrorists.


One thing you do not see, Nazi, is atheist sects fighting one another.

Okay folks - we have a "Godwin" ; thread closed.
Godwin some kind of Neocon apologist?
I'll post the explanation though I think you fully understand it & are
just having fun with your reply.

Godwin's law (also Godwin's rule of Nazi analogies) is an adage in
Internet culture that was originated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law
states that:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a
comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.

There is a tradition in many Usenet newsgroups that once such a
comparison is made, the thread is over, and whoever mentioned the
Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress.
Godwin's law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper
bound on thread length in those groups. Many people understand
Godwin's law to mean this, although (as is clear from the statement of
the law above) this is not the original formulation.