wrote:

Who produces large windmills 100kw into the megawatts?

regards,
Bob

Vestas, out of the Netherlands. http://www.vestas.com

--
Eric F. Richards

"Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- Myron Glass,
often attributed to J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940

EFR,

On 1 Oct 2005 10:02:38 -0700, "RHF"
wrote:

EFR,
.
IIRC - These are the same people that have the Wind Energy Farm
along the Hills near the Altamont Pass in California. ~ RHF
http://www.highton.com/pages/portfpa...passportf.html
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~abrown/P...1_h_thumb.html
.
.
. .
You would be referring to the wonderful implementation of
environmentally friendly power generation that the current crop of
environmentalists want closed down because birds hit the bladed and
die - correct? You just can't make some activists happy anymore

I have an idea I think I know of a Very Good Idea (actually,two Very
Good Ideas) of how to get Free Energy.I won't explain about my two Very
Good Ideas for Free Energy to anybody though,although I can't see why my
two Very Good Ideas for Free Energy wouldn't work.I will take my two
Very Good Ideas for Free Energy to my grave with me.I am Highly ****ed
Off!!! with fed govt and I am keeping my Sekerts to meself.They are in
my Super Smart Intelligent Mind,I have never sketched them out on paper
before.Even my Super Smart Intelligent Doggy www.cattledog.com
doesn't know.
cuhulin

wrote:

On 1 Oct 2005 10:02:38 -0700, "RHF"
wrote:

EFR,
.
IIRC - These are the same people that have the Wind Energy Farm
along the Hills near the Altamont Pass in California. ~ RHF
http://www.highton.com/pages/portfpa...passportf.html
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~abrown/P...1_h_thumb.html
.
.
. .
You would be referring to the wonderful implementation of
environmentally friendly power generation that the current crop of
environmentalists want closed down because birds hit the bladed and
die - correct? You just can't make some activists happy anymore

Congratulation -- you drank the Kool Aid. No one -- no
environmentalist -- believes that myth. There was some worry about
it, enough to prompt a study, that showed that birds have no problem
with the blades and steering clear of them. Birdstrikes occur, but
are relatively rare, down in the statistical noise.

But believe everything that Rush tells you, because he's soooo
intelligent and open minded.

--
Eric F. Richards

"I have in mind a bloodbath that is thoroughly bipartisan. Let the
Clintons be the first to go. American politics will not be healthy until
they are purged from the system. Issue exit visas to Trent Lott and Tom
DeLay, to Dick Armey, to the ancient and awful Strom Thurmond and the
odious Jesse Helms. Let the ostraca fall upon the bombastic charlatan
Jesse Jackson, upon Henry Hyde and Maxine Waters, upon Barbara Boxer
and Orrin Hatch." - Lance Morrow,
http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...,88598,00.html

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 23:32:06 -0600, Eric F. Richards
wrote:

wrote:

On 1 Oct 2005 10:02:38 -0700, "RHF"
wrote:

EFR,
.
IIRC - These are the same people that have the Wind Energy Farm
along the Hills near the Altamont Pass in California. ~ RHF
http://www.highton.com/pages/portfpa...passportf.html
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~abrown/P...1_h_thumb.html
.
.
. .
You would be referring to the wonderful implementation of
environmentally friendly power generation that the current crop of
environmentalists want closed down because birds hit the bladed and
die - correct? You just can't make some activists happy anymore

Congratulation -- you drank the Kool Aid. No one -- no
environmentalist -- believes that myth. There was some worry about
it, enough to prompt a study, that showed that birds have no problem
with the blades and steering clear of them. Birdstrikes occur, but
are relatively rare, down in the statistical noise.

But believe everything that Rush tells you, because he's soooo
intelligent and open minded.
Didn't hear it from Rush - read it in The Los Angeles Times - a noted
'liberal' news paper. From what I've read in other than the LA Times,
the information said same as yo do - that most of the birds figure it
out. However, that particular windfarm is still now under restricted
operation due to concern for migratory birds so in this case the
environmentalists did win.

On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 07:38:32 -0700, wrote:

Didn't hear it from Rush - read it in The Los Angeles Times - a noted
'liberal' news paper. From what I've read in other than the LA Times,
the information said same as yo do - that most of the birds figure it
out. However, that particular windfarm is still now under restricted
operation due to concern for migratory birds so in this case the
environmentalists did win.

Migratory birds are doomed anyway. Their annual flughts are supposed
to coincide with larval stages of certain insects and climate change
has screwed that timing up to the point that the birds don't have any
food.

David wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 07:38:32 -0700, wrote:

Didn't hear it from Rush - read it in The Los Angeles Times - a noted
'liberal' news paper. From what I've read in other than the LA Times,
the information said same as yo do - that most of the birds figure it
out. However, that particular windfarm is still now under restricted
operation due to concern for migratory birds so in this case the
environmentalists did win.

Migratory birds are doomed anyway. Their annual flughts are supposed
to coincide with larval stages of certain insects and climate change
has screwed that timing up to the point that the birds don't have any
food.



Sea life is in danger too. Only someone with the IQ of a dxAce can deny
that degradation is dangerously severe.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8796487


Thousands of other sites say the same thing.







mike

David wrote:

Migratory birds are doomed anyway. Their annual flughts are supposed
to coincide with larval stages of certain insects and climate change
has screwed that timing up to the point that the birds don't have any
food.


I didn't hear anything on the news about this. More good news for the
environment.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9365607/



mike