9/11-PNAC, 9/11-PNAC
SHOULD BE THE #1 TOPIC OF DISCUSSION
A WAKE-UP CALL THE ALTERNATIVE AND LIBERAL MEDIA:
TO STOP IGNORING 9/11 AND THE PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
Jesse, TvNewsLIES.org Editor, 12, July, 2005

We must open PNAC and 9/11 to public discourse because all roads may
very well lead to or from 9/11.

9/11 is not the reason the Bush/PNAC agenda took shape, it is the
excuse for implementing it.

9/11 gave these men everything they could possibly ask for including
unlimited power to implement their otherwise unacceptable plans for
global domination. Nothing else would have enabled them to go ahead
with their plans. 9/11 was the greatest thing that ever happened to
these men. If that does not make you suspicious, nothing will. What
are the odds that all of this is nothing more than a historical
coincidence? Do these facts, at the very least, merit public
discourse?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EVERYBODY STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING AND ONCE AND FOR ALL PAY ATTENTION
TO THIS!!!
Unless the events of 9/11 are discussed openly and without
apprehension, nothing else is real. When the people who benefited the
most from the events of 9/11 were the very people responsible for
preventing them, something is wrong. Since these people had ability to
prevent, permit or conduct the events themselves, their collective and
individual responses to the events must be examined and analyzed to
the last detail. Anything less would be cowardice.

Even a rookie detective will tell you that motive and means are the
keys to identifying suspects in a crime. The self-proclaimed goals of
the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) clearly establish a more
realistic and plausible motive to create a "new Pearl Harbor" than can
be attributed to any Islamic extremist. As a matter of fact, the
events of 9/11 were perhaps the most counterproductive factors in the
history of Islamic progress. They resulted in an overwhelming backlash
against the many Islamic people around the world.

Contrast the two motives. For the neocons in PNAC, 9/11 was a dream
come true. Their dormant agenda now had an excuse for being
implemented. On the other hand, the motive attributed to terrorists
for the events of 9/11 was the laughable "they hate our freedom,”
ostensibly stemming from the teachings of Islam. In truth, such acts
would have violated the teachings of their religion and exponentially
added a heavy burden to the daily life of every Muslim. This is not to
say that there were no Al Qaeda types involved in the events of 9/11.
It merely raises unanswered questions about what Al Qaeda really is
and with whom their members work. And if they were actually involved
in the events, what were the real reasons for their actions? Their
motives, not those attributed to them, have to become part of the
public discourse.

THE RESPONSE TO 9/11: We discuss the Iraq war as if the plans to
invade Iraq were suddenly thought of on 9/11. We do the same with the
Patriot Act. We do the same with the war in Afghanistan. We do the
same for the continual assault on our Constitution. We do the same for
the unprecedented rise in government secrecy (which actually started
prior to 9/11, with Cheney's secret energy policy meetings). As a
matter of fact, the administration is doing just about anything it
wants, in secret, using the excuse of 9/11. This unlimited power is a
dream come true for the PNAC cabal. The media constantly repeat the
neocon mantra that 9/11 justifies all of this unchecked power. Nothing
can be further from the truth.

9/11 is not the reason the Bush/PNAC agenda took shape, it is the
excuse for its implementation. It was not a response to the events of
9/11. It was waiting in the wings for an event like 9/11 to breath
life into it much like the bolts of lightening that brought life to
the Frankenstein monster.

The members of the Project For a New American Century had their agenda
prepared and published before they propped up an uniformed,
inexperienced, failed businessman named George W. Bush as their poster
candidate. He had great appeal among the good ole boys and the bible
thumpers who were not very likely to vote for the scowling man behind
the curtain, Dick Cheney. George W. Bush had not been sitting around
for the previous 10 years thinking about foreign policy. Rather, he
was being coached on foreign policy by handlers who had to teach him
that Africa was a continent and not a country.

The stated aims of PNAC can be followed from their war plans to their
hopes of global military superiority. George W. Bush was not a factor
when PNAC was writing its openly published policies. But once the
2000 election was secured, PNAC members became and remain the mainstay
of the Bush administration, holding virtually every major position
relating to foreign policy.

However, to this day, PNAC has not been mentioned by any of our
corporate news media. Most Americans have never heard of it, and few
can name its members in positions of power in their own government. As
a matter of fact the chairman of PNAC, William Kristol (Editor of the
PNAC publication, the Weekly Standard), is a regular pundit offering
analyses of Bush policies on FOX News. Never has Kristol been
identified as having any connection to PNAC despite being one of the
authors of our current foreign policy. He is regularly presented to
the public as an impartial journalist. In fact, not a single
government spokesperson has ever been identified as a PNAC member.
Talk about media deception!

When there is any discussion of Bush policy, from the Iraq War to the
Patriot Act, we are told that 9/11 changed everything. This is
nonsense. The most controversial acts of the Bush/PNAC administration
were planned and held in abeyance prior to 9/11. The people who
prepared the PNAC agenda did not think they had a chance in hell of
their goals coming to fruition. Can you imagine the Patriot Act
passing without 9/11 having taken place?

Reality check: The 800 + pages of the Patriot Act were written prior
to 9/11. So were the plans to invade both Afghanistan and Iraq. But
PNAC needed 9/11 to take place. They wanted 9/11 to take place. They
wrote about 9/11 (their new Pearl Harbor) taking place. What makes you
think they had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 taking place?

As a matter of fact, the book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy
and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, by Zbigniew Brzezinski, published
in 1998, basically blueprints everything that is going on today as it
relates to the military primacy of the US and it's domination of the
world. This is not new stuff. The Bush/PNAC administration is not
responding to 9/11. They are in fact carrying out a pre-planned agenda
made possible by 9/11.



FACT: We have an administration built around a group of people that
has drawn members from previous administrations, many of whom were
involved in crimes, lies, dirty tricks and warmongering. From the
dirty tricks camp of Nixon to the crop of Iran-Contra felons, our
administration is comprised of people who have treated our government
and military as tools for their personal use. Add to that former
members of the George H. W. Bush's administration and his and circle
of friends. Remember that Daddy Bush hired a PR firm to create lies
that would coerce Congress into attacking Iraq even after he had given
Saddam a tacit nod to invade Kuwait. (That, by the way, was an
impeachable offense). All these people were assembled and ready for
action before they ever invited George W. Bush to run as their front
man.

FACT: These men had an agenda, which is public and was published on
their own website. This agenda was so radical that it would have take
a very long time to implement unless there was, in their words, "some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." Do you
think that the lives of a few thousand strangers were too high a price
for them to pay for unlimited power? Do you think they were incapable
of finding some way to proceed with an agenda that was otherwise
destined to remain in the "unreachable/radical policy" file?

FACT: 9/11 gave these men everything they could possibly ask for
including unlimited power to implement their otherwise unacceptable
plans for global domination. Nothing else would have enabled them to
go ahead with their plans. 9/11 was the greatest thing that ever
happened to these men. If that does not make you suspicious, nothing
will. What are the odds that all of this is nothing more than a
historical coincidence? Do these facts, at the very least, merit
public discourse?

BELIEVABLE?: The failure of virtually every existing standard security
procedure on 9/11 is so implausible that without active and wide
spread interference there would be no way the events could have
unfolded over the time period in question. Every agency with
responsibility for our protection on the day of the events failed to
follow procedure. Every one. This happening by accident is not only
implausible but the mathematical odds are mind-boggling. Add in the
PNAC motive factor and the odds of this being a coincidence become
incalculable. Imagine having a government in place that was comprised
of people who openly professed the benefits of a new Pearl Harbor on
the day it actually occurred, and imagine that this has never been a
topic of public discourse. No need to imagine because it it true.

THE LIBERAL/ALTERNATIVE MEDIA:

The so-called liberal media, along with a large segment of the
alternative media, are playing a dangerous game. They are perpetuating
a false reality in much the same way as our criminal corporate media.
They claim to be the saviors of truth. They do discuss real issues
that are omitted from the fairy tale reality portrayed by our
corporate media. Election fraud, treason, blatant and numerous lies
that led to war, convicted felons back in the White House (Iran Contra
felons), and the dismantling of our Constitution are all important
issues addressed in detail only by the liberal and alternative media.

While these issues are vital, they can not be discussed in isolation
of the motives of the Project for a New American Century and the
empowering payday they reaped from the events of 9/11. Omitting the
9/11-PNAC connection during these discussions perpetuates an
incomplete reality of America and the world. Even the liberal and
alternative media pretend that PNAC does not exist. PNAC is at the
crux of every geopolitical event taking place today in this nation.
The members of this organization have to be exposed and discussed and
they have to be part of the American vernacular.

Those of you who have seen TvNewsLIES editorials regularly linked on
other alternative news sites may notice a trend. Some sites, no matter
how liberal, refuse to discuss 9/11 or PNAC and accordingly will not
link to our editorials on these subjects. While those sites provide a
great deal of information to the public and they are truly invaluable
assets in our battle to preserve our democracy, they must join the
discussion when it comes to the most important event of our lifetime
and the controversial figures of the Bush administration.

Of course, the liberal/alternative media's version of life is much
closer to reality than that of the corporate media or the right wing's
mythical image of a faith based America. However, a false reality is
still a false reality.

There are some people in the broadcast media who will discuss the 9/11
issue and PNAC, but they are few and far between. The truth is that
the alternative media for the most part, especially the higher profile
broadcasters, will not acknowledge these issues. And if they are not
willing to discuss the PNAC connection to 9/11, they are ignoring
reality.

The bottom line is that most issues that we are discussing and
virtually every controversial topic hinge on the events of 9/11. If
there had been no 9/11, the preplanned agenda of the Project for a New
American Century would have stayed in remission, where it belonged.
There would have been no Iraq War, no Patriot Act, no diminished civil
rights, no bleeding of the nation’s resources for a fabricated war on
terror, and no financial windfall for the war profiteers. And surely
there would have been no way to convince the public that “9/11 changed
everything!"

I am calling for an end to the inexplicable silence about 9/11 and
PNAC in the media. I am calling for the independent journalists,
webmasters, broadcasters and editors to engage in discussions on the
topics of 9/11, and more importantly PNAC. Reality did not begin on
September 11th, 2001 or on Inauguration Day of that year. It is high
time that the public becomes aware of the individuals who were at the
helm when "everything changed!"

A WAKE-UP CALL: Our corporate media are all but dead. We have to
counter the false reality being presented to the public by this
behemoth. The alternative media are our only hope. We can no longer
ignore the existence of PNAC. We must open PNAC and 9/11 to public
discourse because all roads may very well lead to or from 9/11.

Jesse - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

Cook this down into a couple sentences..

it reads like incoherent gibberish,

On 1 Oct 2005 06:46:58 -0700, wrote:


Cook this down into a couple sentences..

it reads like incoherent gibberish,

On 1 Oct 2005 06:46:58 -0700, wrote:


Cook this down into a couple sentences..

it reads like incoherent gibberish,

That's because watching television has destroyed your cognitive
faculties and reduced your attention span to that of a Chiahuahua on
amphetamine..

yeah, coming from Calif you'd probably know about

Chiahuahuas on Amphetamines..

( Frisky little doggy )

On 1 Oct 2005 08:04:09 -0700, wrote:


yeah, coming from Calif you'd probably know about

Chiahuahuas on Amphetamines..

( Frisky little doggy )

Television has also programmed you to be suspicious of evil
Californians.

Thats ridiculous.. there are NO evil Califonians..

( Seen it Fox News ! )

DaviD - Looks into a Mirror and Sees...
" a Chiahuahua on amphetamine.. "