|
Great Liberty Net 3.931
nobodys old friend wrote: KØHB wrote: "nobodys_old_friend" simple Bull#### Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and weall agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do "denying" "named" No... Most of us said you're NOT our EQUAL. There's a difference. There's only one thing I KNOW you do better than me, and a second I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on... The first is lying. The second one is physically gratifying the male of the species... But I wasn't talking about "rights". I was talking about the flawed notion that "all men are CREATED equal". We all have different physical attributes, different levels of intelligence, different native skills and abilities, etc., etc., etc. Clearly we are NOT created equal. As an example, you may have a great sense of pitch and rythm along with a good voice, so might becomea famous singer. I on the other hand, can't carry a tune in a tow sack. Clearto all but deaf observers, we are NOT equal. The same analogy can be applied to any human attribute you wish to examine, yet politicians (even though they don't practice it themselves) still feed the masses this "created equal" myth, and the masses still buy into it. If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html why since the line of "Reasoning" is GIGO I recommended it because KV does a much better job than I in illustrating the issue. well in this case itis not the issue I am interested in, so it would still be GIGO, just for different reason In other words you have no reasonable sound defense, so you'll just slink away with some bland excuse... No problem. Steve, K4YZ |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
KØHB wrote: "nobodys_old_friend" simple Bull#### Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. But I wasn't talking about "rights". I was talking about the flawed notion that "all men are CREATED equal". We all have different physical attributes, different levels of intelligence, different native skills and abilities, etc., etc., etc. Clearly we are NOT created equal. As an example, you may have a great sense of pitch and rythm along with a good voice, so might become afamous singer...(SNIP) SOMEone in Minnesota let the maple syrup ferment just a bit too long! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. But I wasn't talking about "rights". I was talking about the flawed notion that "all men are CREATED equal". We all have different physical attributes, different levels of intelligence, different native skills and abilities, etc., etc., etc. Clearly we are NOT created equal. As an example, you may have a great sense of pitch and rythm along with a good voice, so might become a famous singer. I on the other hand, can't carry a tune in a tow sack. Clear to all but deaf observers, we are NOT equal. The same analogy can be applied to any human attribute you wish to examine, yet politicians (even though they don't practice it themselves) still feed the masses this "created equal" myth, and the masses still buy into it. If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html why since the line of "Reasoning" is GIGO I recommended it because KV does a much better job than I in illustrating the issue. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB Quite an intriguing story. Although I like science fiction, I've never been a fan of Kurt Vonnegut so have not read this story before. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: KØHB wrote: "nobodys_old_friend" simple Bull#### Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do "denying" "named" No... Most of us said you're NOT our EQUAL. meaning you say Hans was worng is his statement cut |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said that if people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right not to pay any attention. Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. I have stated that there are means for people with difficulties to compensate for those difficulties. If they choose not to take advantage of such tools, don't blame others for their opinions of your work. That you do not want to invest in appropriate tools is again your problem not mine. It's like anything else in life. I'm too short to reach the top of the cupboards so I purchased a step stool. It would be foolish to complain that the top shelf is too high. Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respond. That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regained some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been worth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I want to respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have done in this and the preceding posts. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
"an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said that if people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right not to pay any attention. no you spend days harassing me for it and you continue off and on since then that is dening the right peacefully without explaining myself you choose to deny me that right bymeans of harrasment Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. bull**** you insult other operators based on class Indeed you claim that You have the right to determine if other are insulted despite the a fact it is by law the receiveing that makes that judgment Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. no you spent a wekk harrasing me on the subject Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respond. That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regained some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been worth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I want to respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have done in this and the preceding posts. no false statement you seek to deny the rights of others simple fact ypou claim you have rights that you deny to others like msyelf Dee D. Flint, N8UZE For someone who is so concerned about Baxter's good name and potential slander thereof, you seem totally unconcerned about applying your own double standard and slandering anyone who does not bow down to your mistaken interpretations of other's posts. However, you seem to have gone off the deep end again so I see no point in conversing with you at this time. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said that if people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right not to pay any attention. no you spend days harassing me for it and you continue off and on since then that is dening the right peacefully without explaining myself you choose to deny me that right bymeans of harrasment Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. bull**** you insult other operators based on class Indeed you claim that You have the right to determine if other are insulted despite the a fact it is by law the receiveing that makes that judgment Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. no you spent a wekk harrasing me on the subject Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respond. That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regained some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been worth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I want to respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have donein this and the preceding posts. no false statement you seek to deny the rights of others simple fact ypou claim you have rights that you deny to others like msyelf Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said thatif people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right not to pay any attention. no you spend days harassing me for it and you continue off and on since then that is dening the right peacefully without explaining myself you choose to deny me that right bymeans of harrasment Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. bull**** you insult other operators based on class Indeed you claim that You have the right to determine if other are insulted despite the a fact it is by law the receiveing that makes that judgment Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. no you spent a wekk harrasing me on the subject Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respond. That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regained some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been worth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I wantto respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have done in this and the preceding posts. no false statement you seek to deny the rights of others simple fact ypou claim you have rights that you deny to others like msyelf Dee D. Flint, N8UZE For someone who is so concerned about Baxter's good name and potential slander thereof, you seem totally unconcerned about applying your own double standard and slandering anyone who does not bow down to your mistaken interpretations of other's posts. what are you smoking bitch? no double standard at all not esp concerned about Baxter However, you seem to have gone off the deep end again so I see no point in conversing with you at this time. see to it then nother ever changed I never did tolerate elitist bitch's such as yourself Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" simple Bull**** Hans equality in rights does not mean one gives up the right to the be different You have that part right --- equality in rights is a fine thing, and we all agree with it. obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Quote You ahve stated that I don't have to right to post peacefully without explaining myself to you Unquote This is incorrect. I have never said any such thing. I have said thatif people can't understand you, why do you bother to post and why should we bother to read them. You have the right to post and we have the right not to pay any attention. no you spend days harassing me for it and you continue off and on since then that is dening the right peacefully without explaining myself you choose to deny me that right bymeans of harrasment Quote you have also claimed I and the rest of the techs don't have the priviledge to decide for yourself how to operate (within) the rules without agreeing to acccept the hectoring of personas like yourself Unquote I have not hectored you nor do I approve of anyone hectoring people. If you have misconstrued my statements, that's your problem not mine. bull**** you insult other operators based on class Indeed you claim that You have the right to determine if other are insulted despite the a fact it is by law the receiveing that makes that judgment Quote Indeed you have calimed I am under some obligation to give Bill Gates even more of Money than everyone else Unquote Never said any such thing. no you spent a wekk harrasing me on the subject Quote BTW gues you were not being truthfull when you claimed you did not read my posts or that you could not read em Unquote Incorrect. I stated that I could not read SOME of your posts. If a post is not clear, I don't finish reading it and I don't respond to it. That is my right. Others are quite legible. If I find them interesting, I respond. That is also my right. I also stated that I would not bother with your posts until you had regained some of your equilibrium. Sufficient time has passed that it has been worth checking. I also do a search so as to be able to choose whether I wantto respond if someone should post false statements about me as you have done in this and the preceding posts. no false statement you seek to deny the rights of others simple fact ypou claim you have rights that you deny to others like msyelf Dee D. Flint, N8UZE For someone who is so concerned about Baxter's good name and potential slander thereof, you seem totally unconcerned about applying your own double standard and slandering anyone who does not bow down to your mistaken interpretations of other's posts. what are you smoking bitch? no double standard at all not esp concerned about Baxter However, you seem to have gone off the deep end again so I see no point in conversing with you at this time. see to it then and start being truthfull you have chosen t converse me don't deny it like a hypocrit nother ever changed I never did tolerate elitist bitch's such as yourself Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I think it's the human being part that has him confused. BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same rights so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... an old friend wrote: BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same rights so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I ever denied you have the same rights? Don't bother. Everyone who has ever disagreed with him or pointed out his errors or used normal English words such as "class" in exactly the same manner as the FCC uses it is automatically denying him his rights and/or denigrating him. Only his definitions can be considered correct or he is being denied his rights. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same rights so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I ever denied you have the same rights? by your remarks plain and simple |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Dee Flint wrote:
"an old friend" wrote in message obvioulsy not Hans or I guess you haven't been reading Dan lately, he has been dening I have the same rights as Him. In addition Steve, Dee, Dave Heil, even most recently some one neamed "ace" and others making claims based on various nonsense that I don't have the same rights as they do _____________________________________________ I have never stated you do not have the same rights as any other human being. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I think it's the human being part that has him confused. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
an old friend wrote:
BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same rights so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I ever denied you have the same rights? |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same rights so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I ever denied you have the same rights? by your remarks plain and simple Ok, another chance, please quote any remarks I have made that would deny you your rights. your words form craftmen and subcontractors quote I think the word "intellectual" is streatching it quite a bit. unquote denieling that I have the same proerty rights as everyone else and why don't you even bother to remmebr your words for even a couple of hours/ why are you so lazy? |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
an old friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same rights so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I ever denied you have the same rights? by your remarks plain and simple Ok, another chance, please quote any remarks I have made that would deny you your rights. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
You tell em,Lars Larson. www.larslarson.com Why isn't that
Terrorist Jihad Oklahoma story not making big news!? (because U.S.fed govt has a lid on it,, that's why) He tried to buy a lot of amonium nitrate from Justin Fraser's (Fraiser?) feed store.Justin wouldn't sell it to him.(Thank you Justin) cuhulin |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
There was an off duty Police Officer in that feed store in
Norman,Okahoma.The Police Officer in the feed store witnessed everything that was going on in the feed store and he got the Terrorist Jihad guys license plate number.The feed store does not carry that particular kind of amonium nitrate fertilizer nowdays.y'all,say a great BIG Thank You to Mr.Dustin (Justin?) Ellison,owner/propierter of that feed store for NOT selling that Terrorist Jihad dude any Fertilizer.Thanks for reporting about that on your radio talk show,Lars Larson. www.larslarson.com cuhulin |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same rights so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I ever denied you have the same rights? by your remarks plain and simple Ok, another chance, please quote any remarks I have made that would deny you your rights. your words form craftmen and subcontractors quote I think the word "intellectual" is streatching it quite a bit. unquote denieling that I have the same proerty rights as everyone else That in no way denies you of any 'proerty' (whatever the hell that is) or any other rights. Dumber than a bowl of dirt. sure does as does your remark questioning my humanity cut |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
The Terrorist Jihad dude did try to enter the
Stadium,Norman,Oklahoma,but he was refused because he wouldn't let anybody inspect his backpack.He appeared to have a fresh beard,which is a symbol of Terrorist Jihad.There were about 84,000 people in that Stadium in Norman,Oklahoma. cuhulin |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
www.homelandsecurityus.com U.S.federal government Ministry Of
Propaganda (so-called,national news media) is just NOT picking up on that Terrorist Jihad story in Norman,Oklahoma. I need to set my old Philco clock radio to woke me up at about 6:30 AM this morning.One of those girls (y'all ought to see the bath room in her house next door,we got it all torn out,she is going to redo the whole shebang,, gawd,I love that gal) said she will help me pull my 1986 Ford car out of that back yard over there on Jackson Highway in the morning before she goes to work.(the Bell South woman) D..n car won't go in reverse gear and there isn't enough room to turn my car around in that back yard over there,it's only about an eight minute walk from my house,according to my dog barking wris****ch.Why does everything have to happen to me? I am really a nice old F..t cuhulin |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
an old friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an old friend wrote: BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same rights so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I ever denied you have the same rights? by your remarks plain and simple Ok, another chance, please quote any remarks I have made that would deny you your rights. your words form craftmen and subcontractors quote I think the word "intellectual" is streatching it quite a bit. unquote denieling that I have the same proerty rights as everyone else That in no way denies you of any 'proerty' (whatever the hell that is) or any other rights. Dumber than a bowl of dirt. and why don't you even bother to remmebr your words for even a couple of hours/ why are you so lazy? Why are you so stupid? |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
|
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Those who believe in an
artificially enforced equality, therefore, hate the freedom which naturally proves them to be silly and ignorant, brainwashed little sheep. Ace - WH2T "KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "an_old_friend" wrote You are one of those elist folks that can't accept that are ONLy equal of the rest of us The "equality of all" is a naive myth which serves mainly to perpetuate mediocrity in the human race. "....that all men are created equal" makes a nice sound-bite but even the most casual examination of any random sample of humankind disproves it beyond any doubt. It always baffles me that free people buy into the notion of "democratic equality", because in fact the notions of "freedom" and "all are equal" are almost diametrically opposed. If I accept that I am your equal (and that you are mine) then I give up all freedom to be different from you, better than you, or worse than you. I simply WILL NOT give up that freedom, and therefore I reject the notion of "human equality". If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: cut and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman) were slave holders at all therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the pural God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from all the Southern Colonies which later became states? what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write the thing Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment without the use of a quill pen, too. The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of input from Adams and Franklin "Basically", you are an idiot who doesn't know what the hell you are talking about. Oh, and his name was Thomas "Jefferson", stupid. the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved by Tom, that is editing not writing You wouldn't know the difference anyways, stupid. cut Run away, Marky, run away. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Jeff (nospam) wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... Jeff (nospam) wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... not at all but advocating violence against me or even against you "comander" is violation of civl rights, and is in many places a criminal act ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oh B.S. go back to law school. A person can advocate whatever he wants, its what you "do" about it that counts. If advocating violence against someone was a criminal act 40% of this country would be locked up. not at all the legal system has so broken down that the law is hardly enforced doesn't change the law ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Double BS,, cite me "one" case where someone "threatened' to do something and got charged. happens all the time mostly in mob cases and there are people still in jail for merely threatening reagan as a joke people were arested for threatening Mrs Bush on the campiagn trail The legal system hasnt gone to hell,,,, there never has been a law against making threats. guess you have never read the hate crimes laws in the nation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ yea I know all about hate "crimes". Please tell me how you "prove" what someone is thinking and what they were going to do about it. never said I was going to try shows you are not reading the thread too |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Dr.Ace wrote: Free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Those who believe in an artificially enforced equality, therefore, hate the freedom which naturally proves them to be silly and ignorant, brainwashed little sheep. Ace - WH2T bull**** is a complete response , and a proper label for that dreck "KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "an_old_friend" wrote You are one of those elist folks that can't accept that are ONLy equal of the rest of us The "equality of all" is a naive myth which serves mainly to perpetuate mediocrity in the human race. "....that all men are created equal" makes a nice sound-bite but even the most casual examination of any random sample of humankind disproves it beyond any doubt. It always baffles me that free people buy into the notion of "democratic equality", because in fact the notions of "freedom" and "all are equal" are almost diametrically opposed. If I accept that I am your equal (and that you are mine) then I give up all freedom to be different from you, better than you, or worse than you. I simply WILL NOT give up that freedom, and therefore I reject the notion of "human equality". If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
"Dr.Ace" wrote Free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Those who believe in an artificially enforced equality, therefore, hate the freedom which naturally proves them to be silly and ignorant, brainwashed little sheep. Ace - WH2T This should be engraved in two huge marble plaques and displayed in both houses of Congress. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: cut and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman) were slave holders at all therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the pural God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from all the Southern Colonies which later became states? what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write the thing Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment without the use of a quill pen, too. no never said that idiot Read it again or better still have somebody read to you what you wrote above, you retard. still never said the declaration wrote itself Stupid Marky fails to get it even when just about everybody else would. You did practically say it wrote itself, you dumbass. no I don't say that Yes, you did, stupid. nope another lie again you simply lying little boy Again, you don't know what the hell you are talking about, little girl. I sure do I said it was written by Tom (mostly) as part of the comittee set up by John Hancock to manage the declaration That'snot what you said. Quit lying and backpedaling. yes it is little boy you were just too busy trying to flame me to bother reading it was then editied (mostly words hacked out I remember 2 additions to that being "with relance on Divine providence" and "in many cases" to section on trail by jury i think) most notable was the removal of the anti-slavery language. Bull. The only one editing is you because your faggot feelings get hurt so easily. more of your hate filled bile you do sound a lot like what Stevie would like to sound like but is too afraid of convetion to come out and say under his own name cut Run away, little girl Marky. yet more delusion little boy, maybe you should try taking your meds, or some good stiff drinks if you can't aford your meds You should have your psychiatrist increase your electro-shock voltage or your Prozac, Marky, or lay off the booze yourself, you chronic alcoholic. wrong again little boy Oh, you are a regular inpatient in a mental intitution, Marky? wrong again cut. Run away, little girl. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: cut and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman) were slave holders at all therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the pural God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from all the Southern Colonies which later became states? what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write the thing Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment without the use of a quill pen, too. no never said that idiot Read it again or better still have somebody read to you what you wrote above, you retard. still never said the declaration wrote itself Stupid Marky fails to get it even when just about everybody else would. You did practically say it wrote itself, you dumbass. no I don't say that Yes, you did, stupid. nope another lie The proof is in your post, dumbass! again you simply lying little boy Again, you don't know what the hell you are talking about, little girl. You sure do suck cocks, don't you, Marky? I sure do Die of your AIDS, faggot. I said it was written by Tom (mostly) as part of the comittee set up by John Hancock to manage the declaration That'snot what you said. Quit lying and backpedaling. yes it is little boy Thanks for admitting you were lying, Marky. you were just too busy trying to flame me to bother reading You are just too stupid to realize you made a mistake. it was then editied (mostly words hacked out I remember 2 additions to that being "with relance on Divine providence" and "in many cases" to section on trail by jury i think) most notable was the removal of the anti-slavery language. Bull. The only one editing is you because your faggot feelings get hurt so easily. more of your hate filled bile Gonna cry now, little girl? you do sound a lot like what Stevie would like to sound like but is too afraid of convetion to come out and say under his own name You hear sounds along with the many voices in your empty skull, Marky? cut Run away, little girl Marky. yet more delusion little boy, maybe you should try taking your meds, or some good stiff drinks if you can't aford your meds You should have your psychiatrist increase your electro-shock voltage or your Prozac, Marky, or lay off the booze yourself, you chronic alcoholic. wrong again little boy Oh, you are a regular inpatient in a mental intitution, Marky? wrong again Oh, so you did spend half your life in one...... cut. Run away, little girl. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: cut and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman) were slave holders at all therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the pural God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from all the Southern Colonies which later became states? what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write the thing Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment without the use of a quill pen, too. no never said that idiot Read it again or better still have somebody read to you what you wrote above, you retard. still never said the declaration wrote itself Stupid Marky fails to get it even when just about everybody else would. You did practically say it wrote itself, you dumbass. no I don't say that Yes, you did, stupid. nope another lie The proof is in your post, dumbass! where? all that is there is prove that you were lying about the contents again you simply lying little boy Again, you don't know what the hell you are talking about, little girl. You sure do suck cocks, don't you, Marky? more hate I sure do Die of your AIDS, faggot. what AIDS? I said it was written by Tom (mostly) as part of the comittee set up by John Hancock to manage the declaration That'snot what you said. Quit lying and backpedaling. yes it is little boy Thanks for admitting you were lying, Marky. no such admission was made you were just too busy trying to flame me to bother reading You are just too stupid to realize you made a mistake. what mistake? it was then editied (mostly words hacked out I remember 2 additions to that being "with relance on Divine providence" and "in many cases" to section on trail by jury i think) most notable was the removal of the anti-slavery language. Bull. The only one editing is you because your faggot feelings get hurt so easily. more of your hate filled bile Gonna cry now, little girl? no you do sound a lot like what Stevie would like to sound like but is too afraid of convetion to come out and say under his own name You hear sounds along with the many voices in your empty skull, Marky? no cut Run away, little girl Marky. yet more delusion little boy, maybe you should try taking your meds, or some good stiff drinks if you can't aford your meds You should have your psychiatrist increase your electro-shock voltage or your Prozac, Marky, or lay off the booze yourself, you chronic alcoholic. wrong again little boy Oh, you are a regular inpatient in a mental intitution, Marky? wrong again Oh, so you did spend half your life in one...... no never been in one cut. Run away, little girl. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: cut and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman) were slave holders at all therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the pural God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from all the Southern Colonies which later became states? what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write the thing Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment without the use of a quill pen, too. no never said that idiot Read it again or better still have somebody read to you what you wrote above, you retard. still never said the declaration wrote itself Stupid Marky fails to get it even when just about everybody else would. You did practically say it wrote itself, you dumbass. no I don't say that Yes, you did, stupid. nope another lie The proof is in your post, dumbass! where? Read it above, stupid. all that is there is prove that you were lying about the contents No, stupid. You lose as usual. again you simply lying little boy Again, you don't know what the hell you are talking about, little girl. You sure do suck cocks, don't you, Marky? more hate More whining about criticism of your perverted lifestyle? I sure do Die of your AIDS, faggot. what AIDS? The aids you have, Marky. I said it was written by Tom (mostly) as part of the comittee set up by John Hancock to manage the declaration That'snot what you said. Quit lying and backpedaling. yes it is little boy Thanks for admitting you were lying, Marky. no such admission was made Learn to read, dumbass. you were just too busy trying to flame me to bother reading You are just too stupid to realize you made a mistake. what mistake? You mean besides you being born? Read above. it was then editied (mostly words hacked out I remember 2 additions to that being "with relance on Divine providence" and "in many cases" to section on trail by jury i think) most notable was the removal of the anti-slavery language. Bull. The only one editing is you because your faggot feelings get hurt so easily. more of your hate filled bile Gonna cry now, little girl? no Sounds like you are, sugar britches. you do sound a lot like what Stevie would like to sound like but is too afraid of convetion to come out and say under his own name You hear sounds along with the many voices in your empty skull, Marky? no Oh, that's right, sound doesn't travel in a vacuum....... cut Run away, little girl Marky. yet more delusion little boy, maybe you should try taking your meds, or some good stiff drinks if you can't aford your meds You should have your psychiatrist increase your electro-shock voltage or your Prozac, Marky, or lay off the booze yourself, you chronic alcoholic. wrong again little boy Oh, you are a regular inpatient in a mental institution, Marky? wrong again Oh, so you did spend half your life in one...... no never been in one Yes you have and will soon be again...... cut. Run away, little girl. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
N0VFP wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: an old friend wrote: cut and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman) were slave holders at all therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the pural God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from all the Southern Colonies which later became states? what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write the thing Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment without the use of a quill pen, too. no never said that idiot Read it again or better still have somebody read to you what you wrote above, you retard. still never said the declaration wrote itself Stupid Marky fails to get it even when just about everybody else would. You did practically say it wrote itself, you dumbass. no I don't say that Yes, you did, stupid. nope another lie The proof is in your post, dumbass! where? Read it above, stupid. it isn't there all that is there is prove that you were lying about the contents No, stupid. You lose as usual. lose what? again you simply lying little boy Again, you don't know what the hell you are talking about, little girl. You sure do suck cocks, don't you, Marky? more hate More whining about criticism of your perverted lifestyle? no just calling hate, hate I sure do Die of your AIDS, faggot. what AIDS? The aids you have, Marky. no I don't Nobody senible get AIDS these days, at first yes before we knew how it was spread there was a decent excuse I said it was written by Tom (mostly) as part of the comittee set up by John Hancock to manage the declaration That'snot what you said. Quit lying and backpedaling. yes it is little boy Thanks for admitting you were lying, Marky. no such admission was made Learn to read, dumbass. talking to whinny i guess you were just too busy trying to flame me to bother reading You are just too stupid to realize you made a mistake. what mistake? You mean besides you being born? Read above. no mistake there it was then editied (mostly words hacked out I remember 2 additions to that being "with relance on Divine providence" and "in many cases" to section on trail by jury i think) most notable was the removal of the anti-slavery language. Bull. The only one editing is you because your faggot feelings get hurt so easily. more of your hate filled bile Gonna cry now, little girl? no Sounds like you are, sugar britches. then you are of course wrong you do sound a lot like what Stevie would like to sound like but is too afraid of convetion to come out and say under his own name You hear sounds along with the many voices in your empty skull, Marky? no Oh, that's right, sound doesn't travel in a vacuum....... cut Run away, little girl Marky. yet more delusion little boy, maybe you should try taking your meds, or some good stiff drinks if you can't aford your meds You should have your psychiatrist increase your electro-shock voltage or your Prozac, Marky, or lay off the booze yourself, you chronic alcoholic. wrong again little boy Oh, you are a regular inpatient in a mental institution, Marky? wrong again Oh, so you did spend half your life in one...... no never been in one Yes you have and will soon be again...... only if I decide to visit someone cut. Run away, little girl. |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Mark / KB9RQZ aka "an Old friend" ,
I believe that you suffer from both Dyslexia and Aphasia (also known as dysphasia). You blame these Psycholinguistic disorders for your inability to pass a Morse code exam. On what brain dysfunction do you blame your inability or unwillingness to learn to use a simple spell checker? Or are you just that damn lazy? At a quick glance it appears that you have been posting more messages to rec.radio.amateur.misc than anyone else lately, not to mention the other NG's you cross post to. Since I can't recall anyone in any NG ever agreeing with any of the nonsense you prolifically post to numerous NG's it appears that you must have a masochistic desire to be everyone's punching bag. Or possibly you "know you're right about everything" and everyone else is always wrong and you've made it your mission in life to "set the world straight" - No gay pun intended. Ace - WH2T "an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... sure do knwo about it alot mor than you it would seem Markie.....would you PLEASE at LEAST read what you wrote BEFORE you hit send. I am so sick and tired of reading gibberish. then don't read it nobody is hoding a gun to your head ..Are you brain damaged or something? how many time do I have to explain dyslexiod aphasia for you. I have explained it and it results many times try google Dan/W4NTI |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
"an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... sure do knwo about it alot mor than you it would seem Markie.....would you PLEASE at LEAST read what you wrote BEFORE you hit send. I am so sick and tired of reading gibberish. then don't read it nobody is hoding a gun to your head ..Are you brain damaged or something? how many time do I have to explain dyslexiod aphasia for you. I have explained it and it results many times try google Dan/W4NTI I was NOT aware you had a "real" problem. Now that I do. I won't bother you any longer. You can't help yourself, or wont. Dan/W4NTI |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
Dan/W4NTI wrote: "an Old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... sure do knwo about it alot mor than you it would seem Markie.....would you PLEASE at LEAST read what you wrote BEFORE you hit send. I am so sick and tired of reading gibberish. then don't read it nobody is hoding a gun to your head ..Are you brain damaged or something? how many time do I have to explain dyslexiod aphasia for you. I have explained it and it results many times try google Dan/W4NTI I was NOT aware you had a "real" problem. Now that I do. I won't bother you any longer. You can't help yourself, or wont. why do you continue to lie you made it clear in this very thread you don't think BLGT people are entitled to opinions you are just another gay bashing bigot Dan/W4NTI |
Great Liberty Net 3.931
www.devilfinder.com Little Known Facts about the civil war
The civil war: Strange & Fascinating Facts.by Burke Davis.See if you can get your mitts on the book. I have that book here.I bought the book at the Books A Million book store on I-55 Frontage Road about nine years ago.Actually,civil war is a misnomer,it was actually the War Of Northern Aggression. What was "civil" about it? cuhulin |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com