| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOTE: The Amateur/HAM Inverted "L" Antenna is usually made-up
of Two Equal Sections One Vertical 'Leg' and One Horizontal 'Arm'. These Two Equal Section can be: * 1/8th Wavelength = Quarter Wavelength Total * 1/4th Wavelength = Half Wavelength Total * 1/2th Wavelength = One Wavelength Total Because of the 'equal' proportionality, the Amateur/HAM Inverted "L" Antenna is most often Higher above the Ground then the SWL Version. Actually most "ham" inv L's are also built to fit the lot, except that total length is more important if you want it resonant, or a certain length for performance. The stock inv L is a quarter wave long. No matter the up/out ratio. Few hams run 1/2 wave inv L's, unless they are using a tuner, etc. The extended inv L is pretty common, and is usually appx 3/8 or 5/8 wl long. It's often used to reduce ground losses at the base, as the maximum current point is moved upwards off the ground. It also will give more NVIS performance unless the vertical section is very tall. The 3/8 WL version can be matched with a cap. The 5/8 WL with a coil. The only band I've used an inv L on was 160m. I've used both the 1/4 wave, and 5/8 versions. The vertical section was 45 ft, and thrown up and over a tall tree branch. But I yanked it down this last summer as it was redundant. I already have a 160m Z dipole, and can feed my dipoles as a top loaded vertical for long haul, so the inv L wasn't really needed. The shorted coax dipoles that act as a top load vertical outperformed the L most of the time. It's 42 ft tall. About the same as the L, but it has much less radation at high angles being the top loading is balanced. Unless you *want* some horizontal componant for NVIS, etc, the T vertical actually has a cleaner vertical pattern. My Z dipole outperforms the L for horizontal NVIS. MK |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
MK - "Z" Dipole ?
What makes your Dipole a "Z" Dipole ? What are the Advantages of the "Z" Dipole over a stabdard Dipole ? i want to know - iane ~ RHF |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
What makes your Dipole a "Z" Dipole ?
Well, it's a dipole shaped into a Z shape in order to fit this lot. What are the Advantages of the "Z" Dipole over a stabdard Dipole ? None. It is slightly inferior to a "straight" dipole. But...It's more efficient than most any kind of loaded dipole. So...It's about the next best thing to a normal straight dipole. I use it on 160m for NVIS. When I go longer haul, I go to the vertical. MK |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
MK,
So a "Z" Dipole would be Rigged Flat. And in a Square Backyard say 50'x50 you run it between two opposite Corners and then along two parallel Sides; using four support points. ~ RHF |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
So a "Z" Dipole would be Rigged Flat.
And in a Square Backyard say 50'x50 you run it between two opposite Corners and then along two parallel Sides; using four support points. Yep. I can run an 80m dipole straight, but not 160m... The Z dipole works pretty well. Better than any loaded version I tried. MK |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Building an antenna | Shortwave | |||
| Antenna wire question. | Shortwave | |||
| Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||