Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
You'd have to go back many decades before you hit a point where a large percentage of shortwave receivers were regenerative. Go back forty, and some would be regenerative, albeit they'd be at the low cost end of the spectrum. Go back to the thirties, and regeneration likely was still common, because superheterodyne designs used more components and hence were too costly for many in the depression era. Nope, nearly all radios by the early 1930's were superhet. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
heterodyne 455 spurious signal on AM | Shortwave |