the church of bush
 

John Barnard wrote:
The Chimp-in-Chief also thinks that being a dictator would make his job easier.

Funny, it was Clinton and his enforcer Janet Reno who were the only ones
in America using armed troops to stifle dissent. No, wait; these people
weren't even dissenting, they just held other viewpoints and wanted to
be left alone to live in peace. It wasn't Bush who sent troops to kill
them.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

clifto wrote:

Powell is a flaming, Bush-bashing, card-carrying liberal. Everything
he has said since the start of the Iraq war confirms it.

Huh??? Bush chose the "Bush-bashing, card-carrying liberal" Powell to
hold a very high position in his administration for four years and
additionally made his son Chairman of the FCC. THAT Bush-bashing
Powell?? Yeah, right. Get real!

Everything he [Powell] has said since the start of the Iraq war confirms it.

Are we talking about the same Powell here? The one whose impassioned
speech in front of the UN helped *start* the Iraq war???

Do you even remotely consider the possibility that Powell "saw the error
of his ways" and was man enough to want to set the record straight?

the church of bush
 

Carter-K8VT wrote:
clifto wrote:
Everything he [Powell] has said since the start of the Iraq war confirms it.

Do you even remotely consider the possibility that Powell "saw the error
of his ways" and was man enough to want to set the record straight?

Doesn't fit his actions as well as my explanation.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

Greg wrote:
From: clifto
Uh huh. And here he is, years after the fact, to contradict virtually
every person who's held office in the USA since 1996.

well, he contradicted Cheney at the time of Cheney's remarks, though not
publically.

Uh huh.

It's certain Zinni is a liberal because (1) he's bashing Cheney and (2)
he claims to know more about running things than everyone else.

Cheney has an approval rating of something like 12%. Isn't it's gratifying
to think that 88% of Americans are liberals!

Probably 88% of the people most pollsters try to get political answers
from are liberals, the other 12% are surprises to the pollsters. For
example, you'll find countless political polls in downtown Chicago,
but you'll seldom if ever find one in the suburbs, not even the more
liberal ones like Oak Park and Evanston.

If that's the best you have, give up now, avoid the holiday rush.

It's not just General Zinni, there are a lot of military people in the
Pentagon who are at odds with the way your politicians are pursuing the war.
And he wasn't really bashing Cheney, just expressing his astonishment at
what Cheney was saying. But you're a lot smarter than General Zinni, aren't
you? (And I wouldn't waste my best on you cliffy.)

And here again, the ad hominem is the mark of the man without a valid
argument.

If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

Not surprising. Nor clever. Nor funny.

If McCain gets the Repub nomination, and we know certainly that whoever
gets the Dem nomination will be somewhere miles left of Karl Marx, then
we might as well all vote for some true leftist instead of the phonies
we'll have been offered.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

Greg wrote:
From: clifto
John Barnard wrote:
It's a bad sign when Buchanan and GF Will start to criticize a Republican
administration.

Not really. Just a strong indicator of the fact that the conservative
movement is alive and stronger than ever.

Too bad, but it's too late for the Bunnypants administration to join the
conservative movement.

He's a lot closer to a conservative than someone like McCain.

If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

You would like China - political dissent is not tolerated.

Dissent is one thing. Lies are entirely another.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

Greg wrote:
From: clifto
We don't. Putting underwear on someone's head does not constitute torture.

Is that what they're doing in those secret CIA prison camps in Eastern
Europe? I wonder why they're doing that? And how do you explain the
prisoners that died from "underpants on their head"? Most unusual! I wish I
had your insight.

Putting underwear on prisoners' heads was listed as one of the tortures
inflicted on the Iraqis during the earliest accusations.

Look at the "tortures" poor Pfc. England is going to spend years in prison
for inflicting; putting leashes on people, pointing at them while they're
naked.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

Greg wrote:
From: clifto
Greg wrote:
Torture is what Bush want to legalize.

I want you to remember forever that you said that in public where everyone
could see.

Bush repeats threat to veto torture curb
[snip]
*The 90-to-9 vote to ban "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment" of anyone in U.S. government custody

"OR DEGRADING TREATMENT"??? What, like having to eat ordinary dinners
or spend their time in unfurnished, small cells? Only the Senate would
give a 90-9 vote for something like that.

The wording also specifically prohibits punishment of any prisoner for
any reason. Only true scum would allow such weasel wording to become
law.


The system was apparently so secret that even members of Congress in charge
of overseeing the CIA's covert actions didn't know about it. And they are
unhappy.

Right. They're too important to be left out of military matters; after
all, they are the executive branch of government, too. Furrfu.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

Brenda Ann wrote:
"clifto" wrote...
Funny, it was Clinton and his enforcer Janet Reno who were the only ones
in America using armed troops to stifle dissent. No, wait; these people
weren't even dissenting, they just held other viewpoints and wanted to
be left alone to live in peace. It wasn't Bush who sent troops to kill
them.

True enough. Ruby Ridge and Waco were definitely criminal doings that
happened on Clinton's watch.

However, for good or bad, it WAS Dubya that said "If this were a
dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the
dictator."

First, it was meant as humor. Second, tell yourself you've never ever said
the same thing to yourself.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

clifto wrote:
Carter-K8VT wrote:

clifto wrote:

Everything he [Powell] has said since the start of the Iraq war confirms it.

Do you even remotely consider the possibility that Powell "saw the error
of his ways" and was man enough to want to set the record straight?

Doesn't fit his actions as well as my explanation.

Well, if you say so...but I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I
just have too much trouble accepting your explanation that dubya would
give the highest (or one of the highest) appointed posts in the land to
"a flaming, Bush-bashing, card-carrying liberal" for four years. Now,
you *could* make the case that after a few years, Powell changed his
tune, going from a Bush loyalist (loyal enough to get the job) to being
a "Bush-basher".

You can say many things about Powell, but not that he is dumb. So, even
if the (unlikely) scenario I described above of Powell changing his
spots is true, then you *have* to ask WHY he changed from a loyalist to
a basher. Did he just finally get sick of the lies and corruption???

the church of bush
 

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:55:53 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

Greg wrote:
From: clifto
Uh huh. And here he is, years after the fact, to contradict virtually
every person who's held office in the USA since 1996.

well, he contradicted Cheney at the time of Cheney's remarks, though not
publically.

Uh huh.

It's certain Zinni is a liberal because (1) he's bashing Cheney and (2)
he claims to know more about running things than everyone else.

Cheney has an approval rating of something like 12%. Isn't it's gratifying
to think that 88% of Americans are liberals!

Probably 88% of the people most pollsters try to get political answers
from are liberals, the other 12% are surprises to the pollsters. For
example, you'll find countless political polls in downtown Chicago,
but you'll seldom if ever find one in the suburbs, not even the more
liberal ones like Oak Park and Evanston.

So the polls are wrong, people really like Cheney?

If that's the best you have, give up now, avoid the holiday rush.

It's not just General Zinni, there are a lot of military people in the
Pentagon who are at odds with the way your politicians are pursuing the war.
And he wasn't really bashing Cheney, just expressing his astonishment at
what Cheney was saying. But you're a lot smarter than General Zinni, aren't
you? (And I wouldn't waste my best on you cliffy.)

And here again, the ad hominem is the mark of the man without a valid
argument.

Which man, Me or Zinni? My point is that the administration hyped the
invadion of Iraq and now people are disillusioned with the results (or lack
thereof). "People" includes the public, the Congress, and members of the
military. I can't speak for Zinni, but he speaks quite well for himself.

If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

Not surprising. Nor clever. Nor funny.

If McCain gets the Repub nomination, and we know certainly that whoever
gets the Dem nomination will be somewhere miles left of Karl Marx, then
we might as well all vote for some true leftist instead of the phonies
we'll have been offered.

Doesn't warrant a serious answer.

If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.
Greg

the church of bush
 

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:06:19 -0600, clifto wrote:

Greg wrote:
From: clifto
We don't. Putting underwear on someone's head does not constitute torture.

Is that what they're doing in those secret CIA prison camps in Eastern
Europe? I wonder why they're doing that? And how do you explain the
prisoners that died from "underpants on their head"? Most unusual! I wish I
had your insight.

Putting underwear on prisoners' heads was listed as one of the tortures
inflicted on the Iraqis during the earliest accusations.

Look at the "tortures" poor Pfc. England is going to spend years in prison

Just the lesbo rape she so well deserves.

for inflicting; putting leashes on people, pointing at them while they're
naked.

the church of bush
 

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:11:53 -0600, clifto wrote:

If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

May you get what you deserve for your vote.

the church of bush
 

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:14:02 -0600, clifto wrote:

Brenda Ann wrote:
"clifto" wrote...
Funny, it was Clinton and his enforcer Janet Reno who were the only ones
in America using armed troops to stifle dissent. No, wait; these people
weren't even dissenting, they just held other viewpoints and wanted to
be left alone to live in peace. It wasn't Bush who sent troops to kill
them.

Only because he wasn't given the opportunity.

Funny, it was the Ashcroft DoJ which changed the policy on
FOIA requests.

Under Reno, it was, "Absent a national security reason to
withhold, release the information.'

Under Ashcroft, it became, "Absent a court order to the
contrary, withhold the information."

****ing Bush hyper-secret cabal.

the church of bush
 

Heck,I can't even get them wimmins I email to send me their panties so I
can wear them on top of my head.
cuhulin

the church of bush
 

Carter-K8VT wrote:
clifto wrote:
Carter-K8VT wrote:
clifto wrote:
Everything he [Powell] has said since the start of the Iraq war confirms it.

Do you even remotely consider the possibility that Powell "saw the error
of his ways" and was man enough to want to set the record straight?

Doesn't fit his actions as well as my explanation.

Well, if you say so...but I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I
just have too much trouble accepting your explanation that dubya would
give the highest (or one of the highest) appointed posts in the land to
"a flaming, Bush-bashing, card-carrying liberal" for four years.

Bush has angered a lot of conservatives by what appear to be conciliatory
moves, like Powell; backing Arlen "Here's The Blade, Where's Your Back?"
Spector over Toomey; and several others.

Now,
you *could* make the case that after a few years, Powell changed his
tune, going from a Bush loyalist (loyal enough to get the job) to being
a "Bush-basher".

You can say many things about Powell, but not that he is dumb. So, even
if the (unlikely) scenario I described above of Powell changing his
spots is true, then you *have* to ask WHY he changed from a loyalist to
a basher. Did he just finally get sick of the lies and corruption???

He wasn't getting enough spotlight. He figured the Democrats would offer
more spotlight.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

John Barnard wrote:
Ad hominem attacks are usually the first sign someone gives that he's
completely out of relevant facts and salient points.

That statement explains D-Ex-Ace and Tracy Nancy Fort.

The Clifto Clavin remark was yours.

And all you can say is
that Powell, in your opinion, is a flaming liberal. I guess that you are
conveniently ignoring Powell's role in the Bush I government and the role Powell
has played in the Bush II government. How many liberals do you think Bush II has
appointed to his government?

Include liberals he's backed, like another backstabber Arlen Spector, and
if you look, you'll find all too many.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

Greg wrote:
From: clifto
Greg wrote:
From: clifto
It's certain Zinni is a liberal because (1) he's bashing Cheney and (2)
he claims to know more about running things than everyone else.

Cheney has an approval rating of something like 12%. Isn't it's gratifying
to think that 88% of Americans are liberals!

Probably 88% of the people most pollsters try to get political answers
from are liberals, the other 12% are surprises to the pollsters. For
example, you'll find countless political polls in downtown Chicago,
but you'll seldom if ever find one in the suburbs, not even the more
liberal ones like Oak Park and Evanston.

So the polls are wrong, people really like Cheney?

More than you'd like to believe, certainly.

If that's the best you have, give up now, avoid the holiday rush.

It's not just General Zinni, there are a lot of military people in the
Pentagon who are at odds with the way your politicians are pursuing the war.
And he wasn't really bashing Cheney, just expressing his astonishment at
what Cheney was saying. But you're a lot smarter than General Zinni, aren't
you? (And I wouldn't waste my best on you cliffy.)

And here again, the ad hominem is the mark of the man without a valid
argument.

Which man, Me or Zinni?

Whichever one said "I wouldn't waste my best on you cliffy." Look up
"ad hominem".

My point is that the administration hyped the
invadion of Iraq and now people are disillusioned with the results (or lack
thereof). "People" includes the public, the Congress, and members of the
military. I can't speak for Zinni, but he speaks quite well for himself.

"People" includes liberals only. They and you and the liberal press are
trying to inflate their numbers and relevance to make it seem as though
there's a good reason to abandon the cause now.

If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

Not surprising. Nor clever. Nor funny.

If McCain gets the Repub nomination, and we know certainly that whoever
gets the Dem nomination will be somewhere miles left of Karl Marx, then
we might as well all vote for some true leftist instead of the phonies
we'll have been offered.

Doesn't warrant a serious answer.

It wasn't said seeking an answer. You remarked on it, I explained it to you.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

the church of bush
 

the church of bush
 

Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:14:51 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

"People" includes liberals only. They and you and the liberal press are
trying to inflate their numbers and relevance to make it seem as though
there's a good reason to abandon the cause now.

Simply not true. Congressmen on both sides of the fence are asking for a
plan, a timetable, regarding when we can turn this mess over to the Iraqis.
Wasn't that the original stated goal? I don't know of anybody demanding we
cut and run (the cynical Republican sham resolution aside). I'm not saying
there isn't someone with that attitude - I just don't know who it is. The
consensus among Dem leaders is that we need to see this thing through, but
with some sort of exit plan.

The exit plan is that when the job is finished, we leave.

Pretty simple isn't it, Dummycrat?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

the church of bush
 

The exit plan is that when the job is finished, we leave.

Pretty simple isn't it, Dummycrat?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Yeah, it's simple and good on its surface - but define "finished." I
don't care whose definition, I'd love to hear *just one.* Steve,
what's your definition? It's probably as good as any Bush has come up
with...assuming he's got one.

Bruce Jensen

the church of bush
 

If it was the Iraqi insurgents doing this to our soldiers (the
demeaning nude stuff, not the real torture), would you not be screaming
for their blood?

What's funny is that the libs aren't screaming for insurgent blood at all! They
seem to think the USA is the enemy.

Well, we are *somebody's* enemy. It depends purely on one's
perspective. I suppose that there are some out there who use the
rational that the U.S. is always right and thereforre we are really
*everybody's* friend, and some nations are just too stupid to realize
it and thus need to be taught a violent lesson.

I don't make a habit of screaming for *anyone's* blood. I'd rather
concentrate on solving problems. Sometimes ya gotta fight to do this,
sometimes ya don't. No matter what, there's no point in making a bad
situation worse, and once you've captured the "bad guys," there's no
non-strategic need to be cruel.

But that's typical left-wing behaviour.

No, just typical *civilized* behavior.

Again, no answer to the question. *That's* typical right-wing
behavior.

BJ

the church of bush
 

bpnjensen wrote:

If it was the Iraqi insurgents doing this to our soldiers (the
demeaning nude stuff, not the real torture), would you not be screaming
for their blood?

What's funny is that the libs aren't screaming for insurgent blood at all! They
seem to think the USA is the enemy.

Well, we are *somebody's* enemy. It depends purely on one's
perspective. I suppose that there are some out there who use the
rational that the U.S. is always right and thereforre we are really
*everybody's* friend, and some nations are just too stupid to realize
it and thus need to be taught a violent lesson.

I don't make a habit of screaming for *anyone's* blood. I'd rather
concentrate on solving problems. Sometimes ya gotta fight to do this,
sometimes ya don't. No matter what, there's no point in making a bad
situation worse, and once you've captured the "bad guys," there's no
non-strategic need to be cruel.

But that's typical left-wing behaviour.

No, just typical *civilized* behavior.

Again, no answer to the question. *That's* typical right-wing
behavior.

I did give you an answer! You just haven't quite been able to figure it out yet.

And THAT is typical left-wing behaviour.

Boggling, to say the least.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

the church of bush
 

From: dxAce
Organization: The Listener at the Gates of Dawn
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:15:32 -0500
Subject: the church of bush



Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:14:51 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

"People" includes liberals only. They and you and the liberal press are
trying to inflate their numbers and relevance to make it seem as though
there's a good reason to abandon the cause now.

Simply not true. Congressmen on both sides of the fence are asking for a
plan, a timetable, regarding when we can turn this mess over to the Iraqis.
Wasn't that the original stated goal? I don't know of anybody demanding we
cut and run (the cynical Republican sham resolution aside). I'm not saying
there isn't someone with that attitude - I just don't know who it is. The
consensus among Dem leaders is that we need to see this thing through, but
with some sort of exit plan.

The exit plan is that when the job is finished, we leave.

Pretty simple isn't it, Dummycrat?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Everything is simple to you Drakeman.

Greg

the church of bush
 

I did give you an answer! You just haven't quite been able to figure it out yet.

No you didn't - not to the specific question - and that's typical of
*your* behavior. You'll claim any oral expulsion constitutes an answer
when you want to avoid an issue.

To heck with you. Cuhulin provides far more cogency (and
entertainment) in his posts ;-).

BJ

the church of bush
 

bpnjensen wrote:

I did give you an answer! You just haven't quite been able to figure it out yet.

No you didn't - not to the specific question - and that's typical of
*your* behavior. You'll claim any oral expulsion constitutes an answer
when you want to avoid an issue.

To heck with you. Cuhulin provides far more cogency (and
entertainment) in his posts ;-).

It's like I stated earlier that trying to converse with liberals is pretty much a
waste of time!

Round and round we go and you're NEVER satisfied with any answer.

To heck with you too!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

the church of bush
 

Greg wrote:

From: dxAce
Organization: The Listener at the Gates of Dawn
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:15:32 -0500
Subject: the church of bush



Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:14:51 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

"People" includes liberals only. They and you and the liberal press are
trying to inflate their numbers and relevance to make it seem as though
there's a good reason to abandon the cause now.

Simply not true. Congressmen on both sides of the fence are asking for a
plan, a timetable, regarding when we can turn this mess over to the Iraqis.
Wasn't that the original stated goal? I don't know of anybody demanding we
cut and run (the cynical Republican sham resolution aside). I'm not saying
there isn't someone with that attitude - I just don't know who it is. The
consensus among Dem leaders is that we need to see this thing through, but
with some sort of exit plan.

The exit plan is that when the job is finished, we leave.

Pretty simple isn't it, Dummycrat?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Everything is simple to you Drakeman.

That tends to happen when one has an education.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

the church of bush
 

BpnJ - No They Cut Off Their Heads and Filmed the Beheading
so the Liberal Media could use it as Terrorist Propaganda.

So tell me do you want pantys over you head or to be Beheaded ?


something to think about ~ RHF

the church of bush
 

www.devilfinder.com Since bush Wants to Expose the Truth,Let's
Expose ALL Of It!

Hey,does bush even go to Church?
cuhulin

(OT) : Another Typical 'Ping-Pong' Political Thread on R.R.S
 

DX Ace & BpnJ - Ott Oh !
Your Are Both Acting : typical, Typical. TYPICAL !

Typical and Physical sound sort of the same :
There is a song there somewhere - oh yes
- - - "It's Time To Get Typical... Typical !

Then there is always :
- - - Typical on the Right of Me !
- - - Typical on the Left of Me !
- - - Here I am Typically in the Middle Again ! :o)

oh - how typical of me - ott oh ~ RHF
[ Another Typical 'Ping-Pong' Political Thread on R.R.S ]

the church of bush
 

BpnJ - No They Cut Off Their Heads and Filmed the Beheading
so the Liberal Media could use it as Terrorist Propaganda.

So tell me do you want pantys over you head or to be Beheaded ?

something to think about ~ RHF

Ok, now the subject evolves...but...

You don't have to tell me to be outraged about the beheadings and
similar atrocities...I'm with you. Apparently the "liberal media
propaganda" thing, as you put it, didn't work, because everyone thought
that was disgusting and supported increased action against the creeps.

That is beside the point. This choice you set forth is one that
doesn't need to be made. There is no reason to have this kind of sport
with unarmed prisoners unless it is for valid intelligence reasons.

Bruce Jensen

the church of bush
 

bpnjensen wrote:

BpnJ - No They Cut Off Their Heads and Filmed the Beheading
so the Liberal Media could use it as Terrorist Propaganda.

So tell me do you want pantys over you head or to be Beheaded ?

something to think about ~ RHF

Ok, now the subject evolves...but...

You don't have to tell me to be outraged about the beheadings and
similar atrocities...I'm with you. Apparently the "liberal media
propaganda" thing, as you put it, didn't work, because everyone thought
that was disgusting and supported increased action against the creeps.

Really? I thought the left-wing was supporting getting out of Iraq yesterday,
rather than increased action against the creeps.

That is beside the point. This choice you set forth is one that
doesn't need to be made. There is no reason to have this kind of sport
with unarmed prisoners unless it is for valid intelligence reasons.

Oh come on, you'd be whining even if we put them all up at the Hilton.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

(OT) : DX Ace and BpnJ - Agree On Something . . .
 

DX Ace and BpnJ - Agree On Something
.. . . and "Heck" Each Other [.]

So... Now Who Gives A HECK ?

well i say : 'the heck with that' :o) ~ RHF

the church of bush
 

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes,Jane Russell,Marilyn Monroe movie just now
wound up on my tv Radio.Hubba Hubba,I want to see that movie again.
cuhulin

the church of bush
 

You don't have to tell me to be outraged about the beheadings and
similar atrocities...I'm with you. Apparently the "liberal media
propaganda" thing, as you put it, didn't work, because everyone thought
that was disgusting and supported increased action against the creeps.

Really? I thought the left-wing was supporting getting out of Iraq
yesterday,
rather than increased action against the creeps.

Man, I thought you just said to heck with me ;-) No, I think that
under the circumstances as they exist right now, as I suggested to you
earlier, we need to stay at least until the nation is stable. To do
this, we need to fortify the troops the best we can to give them the
greatest absolute position of strength through the end of the period
(which it doesn't sound as though Bush is doing just yet). Then, after
that is accomplished, we (as a nation, not as a Republican party) need
to decide whether there is an additional valid reason to remain.

Does this sound like left-wing to you? (maybe it does!).

That is beside the point. This choice you set forth is one that
doesn't need to be made. There is no reason to have this kind of sport
with unarmed prisoners unless it is for valid intelligence reasons.

Oh come on, you'd be whining even if we put them all up at the Hilton.

Wrong AGAIN, silly boy! Today must be a record for you!

BJ

(OT) : Another Typical 'Ping-Pong' Political Thread on R.R.S
 

The 30 year old brunette woman next door was backing her car down their
driveway.She had parked her car on my yard by my house as usual.She got
the right rear wheel of her car off in the ditch in front of my
house.(Vanessa,why did you want to get your car stuck in that ditch?) I
fired up my raggity old 1978 Al Bundy Dodge van and pulled her car
forward with my tow rope.
cuhulin

the church of bush
 

bpnjensen wrote:

You don't have to tell me to be outraged about the beheadings and
similar atrocities...I'm with you. Apparently the "liberal media
propaganda" thing, as you put it, didn't work, because everyone thought
that was disgusting and supported increased action against the creeps.

Really? I thought the left-wing was supporting getting out of Iraq
yesterday,
rather than increased action against the creeps.

Man, I thought you just said to heck with me ;-)

You've a short memory, dip****. You said to heck with me first.

Run along now.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

the church of bush
 

You've a short memory, dip****. You said to heck with me first.

Run along now.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Ah, your unflappable logic still as intact as the space shuttle
Challenger, I see.

BJ

the church of bush
 

john mmcain,eh? I never did like that sleazbag john mccain.Hey,he
couldn't fly U.S.Navy Jets either,he crashed two of them.However,I am
sorry he was a prisoner in the Hanoie Hilton in North Vietnam,I am Glad
he made it back home.Anyway, www.cfif.org Check it out.
cuhulin

the church of bush
 

The Kindergarten room is three doors down the hall,that way,there's the
door --- []
cuhulin

the church of bush
 

America is a Republic.Those d..n dems and libs keep trying to mess
things up though.
cuhulin