dxAce wrote:

Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:45:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:39:33 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:28:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:17:13 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:03:00 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:46:55 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

All of this comes just as former Marine Corps General and former CENTCOM
commander Anthony Zinni has begun to speak out about the war in Iraq.
Zinni
is the subject of a multiple page article in the Washington Post in
which
he
says "If I'm ever in a position to say what I think is right, I will. .
. .
I don't care what happens to my career."

Zinni is indeed telling it like it is. To quote the Post:

"Iraq is in serious danger of coming apart because of lack of planning,
underestimating the task and buying into a flawed strategy," he says.
"The
longer we stubbornly resist admitting the mistakes and not altering our
approach, the harder it will be to pull this chestnut out of the fire."

Apparently the time that Zinni turned against the Bush Administration
(he
endorsed Bush in the 2000 election) was when he saw Vice President Dick
Cheney speak to a VFW convention.

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of
mass destruction," Cheney said. "There is no doubt that he is amassing
them
to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

Cheney's certitude bewildered Zinni. As chief of the Central Command,
Zinni
had been immersed in U.S. intelligence about Iraq. He was all too
familiar
with the intelligence analysts' doubts about Iraq's programs to acquire
weapons of mass destruction, or WMD. "In my time at Centcom, I watched
the
intelligence, and never -- not once -- did it say, 'He has WMD.' "

That's right. Zinni says that "never ‹ not once ‹ did [the intelligence]
say, 'He has WMD.'" It was uncertain. It was always uncertain. Once
Cheney
left the stage Zinni was conviced of two things: first, that the Bush
Administration was determined to invade and occupy Iraq. And, second,
"These
guys don't understand what they are getting into."

(http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000781.php

Greg



Why does it always have to be WMD's with you guys? You all seem to
forget the other hundred reasons that we should have kicked his butt!

The subject is Bush's lies. Try to keep up.

Greg



Why don't you just answer the question instead of avoiding it?


Are you drunk?

Another 'Classic' 'tard boy response.

LMAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA




I love these guys that just post links to some obscure news story. Do
they actually have the ability to think critically for themselves.
Barnard, Mike, Greg, David, and others they are all cut from the same
mold I think. They remind me of a big turd swirling down the toilet.
Do you think they make up this stuff as they are swirling side by side
on the way down?


Beerbelly, you're not funny and you're not too bright. What else have you
got?

He's far brighter than you, dimbulb.

Are you a Canuck? Are you related to any Canucks? Have you ever dated any Canucks?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You and Tracy seem to be suffering the symptoms of trauma. No wonder you two are so
much alike!

JB

dxAce wrote:

Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

All of this comes just as former Marine Corps General and former CENTCOM
commander Anthony Zinni has begun to speak out about the war in Iraq. Zinni
is the subject of a multiple page article in the Washington Post in which he
says "If I'm ever in a position to say what I think is right, I will. . . .
I don't care what happens to my career."

Zinni is indeed telling it like it is. To quote the Post:

"Iraq is in serious danger of coming apart because of lack of planning,
underestimating the task and buying into a flawed strategy," he says. "The
longer we stubbornly resist admitting the mistakes and not altering our
approach, the harder it will be to pull this chestnut out of the fire."

Apparently the time that Zinni turned against the Bush Administration (he
endorsed Bush in the 2000 election) was when he saw Vice President Dick
Cheney speak to a VFW convention.

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of
mass destruction," Cheney said. "There is no doubt that he is amassing them
to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

Cheney's certitude bewildered Zinni. As chief of the Central Command, Zinni
had been immersed in U.S. intelligence about Iraq. He was all too familiar
with the intelligence analysts' doubts about Iraq's programs to acquire
weapons of mass destruction, or WMD. "In my time at Centcom, I watched the
intelligence, and never -- not once -- did it say, 'He has WMD.' "

That's right. Zinni says that "never ‹ not once ‹ did [the intelligence]
say, 'He has WMD.'" It was uncertain. It was always uncertain. Once Cheney
left the stage Zinni was conviced of two things: first, that the Bush
Administration was determined to invade and occupy Iraq. And, second, "These
guys don't understand what they are getting into."

(http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000781.php

Yep and even though uncertain one has to make a decision. Had President Bush not
made the decision that he did, and Hussein did use WMD's then you stupid
Liberals would be bitching about that and asking why nothing was done.


You argument is specious. How could Hussein use that which he did not have? Bush
cherry picked the intel and rigged the game. Powell, intel experts and American
generals all agree that the WMD premise was a non-issue. Even Rice in 2001 wasn't
worried about Saddam and WMDs.



There's no pleasing you Kool-Aid drinkers.

The truth is pleasing; it's a shame that you chose to ignore it!



dxAce
Michigan
USA

Enjoy your grape Kool-Aid.

JB

wrote:

bush's troubles mount as Republican defections increase.
www.globalnewsmatrix.com

There are similar aricles all over the internet news sites.I don't think
the GOP will ever be popular again as long as bush and cheney are in
there.It is a down hill skid that has no stopping.Anyway,don't blame it
on me,I had nothing to do with it.
cuhulin

It's a bad sign when Buchanan and GF Will start to criticize a Republican
administration.

JB

Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:37:06 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:26:20 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: dxAce
Organization: The Listener at the Gates of Dawn
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:17:42 -0500
Subject: the church of bush



Greg wrote:

From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

The Associated Press
PANAMA CITY, Panama Nov 7, 2005 ‹ President Bush vigorously defended U.S.
interrogation practices in the war on terror Monday and lobbied against a
congressional drive to outlaw torture.
"There's an enemy that lurks and plots and plans and wants to hurt America
again," Bush said. "So you bet we will aggressively pursue them but we will
do so under the law."
He declared, "We do not torture."

'Tard boy liberals such as yourself would rather give the terrorists some
milk,
cookies and a pat on the head.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Actually, I would prefer to have seen Osama killed or captured and Al Qaeda
destroyed in Afghanistan. But, like you, our commander-in-chief has a small
attention span. As to operating torture camps - isn't that what we're
supposed to be opposed to?

Greg


Actually, I don't think making people pose naked is torture,

Nope, that's just good kids having a little fun, eh? Makes the US really
look good.

liberal media got the attention of all the bleeding heart liberals.

...and the entire world.

It was the only way they had to fight back. They whined about some naked
pictures.

The media should protect us from the ugly truth?

What happened to the Jews at the hands of the Nazis, that
was torture.

You're starting to sound like a bleeding heart liberal. Torture is what
Bush want to legalize. He thinks it would make his job so much easier.
He's wrong, as usual.

Greg

The Chimp-in-Chief also thinks that being a dictator would make his job easier.

JB

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:18:25 GMT, John Barnard wrote:



dxAce wrote:

Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:45:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:39:33 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:28:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:17:13 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:03:00 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:46:55 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

All of this comes just as former Marine Corps General and former CENTCOM
commander Anthony Zinni has begun to speak out about the war in Iraq.
Zinni
is the subject of a multiple page article in the Washington Post in
which
he
says "If I'm ever in a position to say what I think is right, I will. .
. .
I don't care what happens to my career."

Zinni is indeed telling it like it is. To quote the Post:

"Iraq is in serious danger of coming apart because of lack of planning,
underestimating the task and buying into a flawed strategy," he says.
"The
longer we stubbornly resist admitting the mistakes and not altering our
approach, the harder it will be to pull this chestnut out of the fire."

Apparently the time that Zinni turned against the Bush Administration
(he
endorsed Bush in the 2000 election) was when he saw Vice President Dick
Cheney speak to a VFW convention.

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of
mass destruction," Cheney said. "There is no doubt that he is amassing
them
to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

Cheney's certitude bewildered Zinni. As chief of the Central Command,
Zinni
had been immersed in U.S. intelligence about Iraq. He was all too
familiar
with the intelligence analysts' doubts about Iraq's programs to acquire
weapons of mass destruction, or WMD. "In my time at Centcom, I watched
the
intelligence, and never -- not once -- did it say, 'He has WMD.' "

That's right. Zinni says that "never ‹ not once ‹ did [the intelligence]
say, 'He has WMD.'" It was uncertain. It was always uncertain. Once
Cheney
left the stage Zinni was conviced of two things: first, that the Bush
Administration was determined to invade and occupy Iraq. And, second,
"These
guys don't understand what they are getting into."

(http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000781.php

Greg



Why does it always have to be WMD's with you guys? You all seem to
forget the other hundred reasons that we should have kicked his butt!

The subject is Bush's lies. Try to keep up.

Greg



Why don't you just answer the question instead of avoiding it?


Are you drunk?

Another 'Classic' 'tard boy response.

LMAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA




I love these guys that just post links to some obscure news story. Do
they actually have the ability to think critically for themselves.
Barnard, Mike, Greg, David, and others they are all cut from the same
mold I think. They remind me of a big turd swirling down the toilet.
Do you think they make up this stuff as they are swirling side by side
on the way down?


Beerbelly, you're not funny and you're not too bright. What else have you
got?

He's far brighter than you, dimbulb.

Are you a Canuck? Are you related to any Canucks? Have you ever dated any Canucks?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You and Tracy seem to be suffering the symptoms of trauma. No wonder you two are so
much alike!

JB



Yep! We can think...you can't!



Usenet'Hole List
---------------------------------
chicken little and his mom!,

Greg wrote:

From: dxAce
Organization: The Listener at the Gates of Dawn
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:07:58 -0500
Subject: the church of bush



Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:45:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:39:33 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:28:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:17:13 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:03:00 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:46:55 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just
for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

All of this comes just as former Marine Corps General and former
CENTCOM
commander Anthony Zinni has begun to speak out about the war in Iraq.
Zinni
is the subject of a multiple page article in the Washington Post in
which
he
says "If I'm ever in a position to say what I think is right, I will.
.
. .
I don't care what happens to my career."

Zinni is indeed telling it like it is. To quote the Post:

"Iraq is in serious danger of coming apart because of lack of
planning,
underestimating the task and buying into a flawed strategy," he says.
"The
longer we stubbornly resist admitting the mistakes and not altering
our
approach, the harder it will be to pull this chestnut out of the
fire."

Apparently the time that Zinni turned against the Bush Administration
(he
endorsed Bush in the 2000 election) was when he saw Vice President
Dick
Cheney speak to a VFW convention.

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons
of
mass destruction," Cheney said. "There is no doubt that he is amassing
them
to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

Cheney's certitude bewildered Zinni. As chief of the Central Command,
Zinni
had been immersed in U.S. intelligence about Iraq. He was all too
familiar
with the intelligence analysts' doubts about Iraq's programs to
acquire
weapons of mass destruction, or WMD. "In my time at Centcom, I watched
the
intelligence, and never -- not once -- did it say, 'He has WMD.' "

That's right. Zinni says that "never ‹ not once ‹ did [the
intelligence]
say, 'He has WMD.'" It was uncertain. It was always uncertain. Once
Cheney
left the stage Zinni was conviced of two things: first, that the Bush
Administration was determined to invade and occupy Iraq. And, second,
"These
guys don't understand what they are getting into."

(http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000781.php

Greg



Why does it always have to be WMD's with you guys? You all seem to
forget the other hundred reasons that we should have kicked his butt!

The subject is Bush's lies. Try to keep up.

Greg



Why don't you just answer the question instead of avoiding it?


Are you drunk?

Another 'Classic' 'tard boy response.

LMAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA




I love these guys that just post links to some obscure news story. Do
they actually have the ability to think critically for themselves.
Barnard, Mike, Greg, David, and others they are all cut from the same
mold I think. They remind me of a big turd swirling down the toilet.
Do you think they make up this stuff as they are swirling side by side
on the way down?


Beerbelly, you're not funny and you're not too bright. What else have you
got?

He's far brighter than you, dimbulb.

Cuhulin is brighter than you.

Are you a Canuck? Are you related to any Canucks? Have you ever dated any
Canucks?


Hurts to have that phobia, doesn't it? I guess calling people names on the
newsgroups make you feel better.

Beats being a 'tard boy liberal any day!

Run along and work on those listening skills, boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Carter-K8VT wrote:

clifto wrote:

Same day, same show, same Clinton, actually defending Bush: "You know,
everybody makes mistakes when they are president. I mean, you can't
make as many calls as you have to make without messing up once in
a while."

Yeah, I guess 2000+ American kids dead, 19,000 American kids mutilated
and tens of thousands of dead innocent civilians is just a little "once
in a while mess up". Shame on us for being so critical of Bunnypants' lies.

LMAO at the 'tard who accused me of insurance fraud.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

John Barnard wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:45:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:39:33 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:28:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:17:13 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:03:00 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:46:55 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

All of this comes just as former Marine Corps General and former CENTCOM
commander Anthony Zinni has begun to speak out about the war in Iraq.
Zinni
is the subject of a multiple page article in the Washington Post in
which
he
says "If I'm ever in a position to say what I think is right, I will. .
. .
I don't care what happens to my career."

Zinni is indeed telling it like it is. To quote the Post:

"Iraq is in serious danger of coming apart because of lack of planning,
underestimating the task and buying into a flawed strategy," he says.
"The
longer we stubbornly resist admitting the mistakes and not altering our
approach, the harder it will be to pull this chestnut out of the fire."

Apparently the time that Zinni turned against the Bush Administration
(he
endorsed Bush in the 2000 election) was when he saw Vice President Dick
Cheney speak to a VFW convention.

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of
mass destruction," Cheney said. "There is no doubt that he is amassing
them
to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

Cheney's certitude bewildered Zinni. As chief of the Central Command,
Zinni
had been immersed in U.S. intelligence about Iraq. He was all too
familiar
with the intelligence analysts' doubts about Iraq's programs to acquire
weapons of mass destruction, or WMD. "In my time at Centcom, I watched
the
intelligence, and never -- not once -- did it say, 'He has WMD.' "

That's right. Zinni says that "never ‹ not once ‹ did [the intelligence]
say, 'He has WMD.'" It was uncertain. It was always uncertain. Once
Cheney
left the stage Zinni was conviced of two things: first, that the Bush
Administration was determined to invade and occupy Iraq. And, second,
"These
guys don't understand what they are getting into."

(http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000781.php

Greg



Why does it always have to be WMD's with you guys? You all seem to
forget the other hundred reasons that we should have kicked his butt!

The subject is Bush's lies. Try to keep up.

Greg



Why don't you just answer the question instead of avoiding it?


Are you drunk?

Another 'Classic' 'tard boy response.

LMAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA




I love these guys that just post links to some obscure news story. Do
they actually have the ability to think critically for themselves.
Barnard, Mike, Greg, David, and others they are all cut from the same
mold I think. They remind me of a big turd swirling down the toilet.
Do you think they make up this stuff as they are swirling side by side
on the way down?


Beerbelly, you're not funny and you're not too bright. What else have you
got?

He's far brighter than you, dimbulb.

Are you a Canuck? Are you related to any Canucks? Have you ever dated any Canucks?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You and Tracy seem to be suffering the symptoms of trauma.

Thanks for the diagnosis, Dr. CanaDork.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Towards the Canadian Homeland Security State.
www.globalnewsmatrix.com

It's coming to y'all too,Canada.
cuhulin

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 05:00:09 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:18:25 GMT, John Barnard wrote:



dxAce wrote:

Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:45:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:39:33 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



Greg wrote:

From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:28:30 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:17:13 GMT, Greg wrote:



From: Beerbarrel
Organization: Cox Communications
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:03:00 -0500
Subject: the church of bush

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:46:55 GMT, Greg
wrote:



From: clifto
Organization: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:52 -0600
Subject: the church of bush

John Barnard wrote:
The war started with lies

Repeating that lie hasn't made it true yet, and it won't. But just
for
entertainment purposes, why not cite us one of those lies?

All of this comes just as former Marine Corps General and former
CENTCOM
commander Anthony Zinni has begun to speak out about the war in
Iraq.
Zinni
is the subject of a multiple page article in the Washington Post in
which
he
says "If I'm ever in a position to say what I think is right, I
will. .
. .
I don't care what happens to my career."

Zinni is indeed telling it like it is. To quote the Post:

"Iraq is in serious danger of coming apart because of lack of
planning,
underestimating the task and buying into a flawed strategy," he
says.
"The
longer we stubbornly resist admitting the mistakes and not altering
our
approach, the harder it will be to pull this chestnut out of the
fire."

Apparently the time that Zinni turned against the Bush
Administration
(he
endorsed Bush in the 2000 election) was when he saw Vice President
Dick
Cheney speak to a VFW convention.

"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has
weapons of
mass destruction," Cheney said. "There is no doubt that he is
amassing
them
to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us."

Cheney's certitude bewildered Zinni. As chief of the Central
Command,
Zinni
had been immersed in U.S. intelligence about Iraq. He was all too
familiar
with the intelligence analysts' doubts about Iraq's programs to
acquire
weapons of mass destruction, or WMD. "In my time at Centcom, I
watched
the
intelligence, and never -- not once -- did it say, 'He has WMD.' "

That's right. Zinni says that "never ‹ not once ‹ did [the
intelligence]
say, 'He has WMD.'" It was uncertain. It was always uncertain. Once
Cheney
left the stage Zinni was conviced of two things: first, that the
Bush
Administration was determined to invade and occupy Iraq. And,
second,
"These
guys don't understand what they are getting into."

(http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000781.php

Greg



Why does it always have to be WMD's with you guys? You all seem to
forget the other hundred reasons that we should have kicked his butt!

The subject is Bush's lies. Try to keep up.

Greg



Why don't you just answer the question instead of avoiding it?


Are you drunk?

Another 'Classic' 'tard boy response.

LMAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA




I love these guys that just post links to some obscure news story. Do
they actually have the ability to think critically for themselves.
Barnard, Mike, Greg, David, and others they are all cut from the same
mold I think. They remind me of a big turd swirling down the toilet.
Do you think they make up this stuff as they are swirling side by side
on the way down?


Beerbelly, you're not funny and you're not too bright. What else have you
got?

He's far brighter than you, dimbulb.

Are you a Canuck? Are you related to any Canucks? Have you ever dated any
Canucks?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You and Tracy seem to be suffering the symptoms of trauma. No wonder you two
are so
much alike!

JB



Yep! We can think...you can't!

Boring stuff. Have another beer.

Greg