Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is a wish list for the "perfect" receiver.
1. specialized search functions- be able to define the search band. (like a VHF scanner) 2. build in audio recorder with squelch- an hour recording time would be nice. make it uploadable to PC. 3. upload/download freqs/text- 4. solar/crank recharger- 5. dc to daylight range- 6. video reception- 7. morse code translator- hey that's a good idea! 8. foreign language translator- 9. GPS postioner- 10. phone jack for remote use- 11. the whole thing the size of a paperback What would your radio do? All the Best, John in Texas.. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would look like Brigitte Bardot.
|
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
d wrote:
It would look like Brigitte Bardot. I was thinking Lauren Graham. The knobs would be smaller, but performance would be striking. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg wrote:
From: "€ Dr. Artaud €" Organization: None Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:03:58 -0600 Subject: What would your dream SW portable receiver look like? wrote in news:1133683898.230776.237900 @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: 1. Quality table top grade with portable features, i.e. carrying strap, feet on bottom and edge opposite to strap, 13.8 V Operation. 2. Sensitive tuner with SSB capabilities with the option to add noise processors, Digital (ugh!), and other likely future needs without sending the unit to the manufacturer to have them installed. 3. Hi and Low Z inputs for the antenna, ergo wire and coax connectors. 4. All knobs parallel to the face of the radio (i.e. no small knobs that partially go inside of the radio). 5. All Buttons on the face of the radio. 6. Variable illumination for the display. 7. Front panel speaker with sufficient clairty and drive to avoid distortion. 8. Jacks for recording (audio and control), computer interface, audio line level out, and disconnect for receiver when unit is being used in conjunction with a transmitter. With the reduction in the price of memory, perhaps an internal memory that can record 2 hours of talk shows. 9. Variable programming options so that the radio can tune to several shows on several frequencies at different times. Perhaps an audio assessment circuit that prohibits the recording of nothing but static and stops the tape. 10. Not made in China. $700 to $900 price range would be OK. Dr. Artaud Sounds more or less like a Drake SW-8, my dream portable. Greg In all applicable seriousness, rare in my house (or so the chihuahua tells me) I've had trouble deciding with radio to drag with me to the North Woods. If it's not my Sat 650 Professional, it's my SW-8. SW-8 isn't the most sensitive off it's whip, but with random wire, or portable active, it's great fun when it's just me and the dog at the cabin. When it's not just me and the dog, I generally don't notice if there's a radio or not. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is a wish list for the "perfect" receiver.
My IC-706 coupled with a laptop can do many of those... 1. specialized search functions- be able to define the search band. (like a VHF scanner) I have 4 scan modes...Better scanner, than some scanners... The receiver itself is better than most scanners for sure.... 2. build in audio recorder with squelch- an hour recording time would be nice. make it uploadable to PC. Have this as long as I have the laptop.. 3. upload/download freqs/text- Yaaaaaa, as they would say in Fargo... 4. solar/crank recharger- Not this, but I never run solar yet... 5. dc to daylight range- pert near...I can receive from .30 to 200 mhz straight line, and then from 400-470 mhz straight line. It's not total coverage, but I can listen to about anything I want. The exception being the military aircraft band on VHF.. 6. video reception- Yaaaaaaa, but what type? I can do SSTV, FAX, etc, etc on HF. Can run full blown ATV on uhf... 7. morse code translator- hey that's a good idea! Thats built into my brain... :/ Option not needed.. 8. foreign language translator- If they don't talk no english, I don't need to listen... ![]() 9. GPS postioner- Yaaaa, if I couple a GPS with the laptop... 10. phone jack for remote use- Yaaaaaa... Can be rigged up...Not that I have much use for it... 11. the whole thing the size of a paperback Not too far off... It's bigger than a paperback, but smaller than many books. It's about half the size of my ARRL antenna handbook as an example. What would your radio do? What it does... http://www.icomamerica.com/products/amateur/706mkIIg/ They make ones even better, if you wanna cough the cashflow... IE: the kenwood TS-2000 is a good do-it-all radio with wide coverage. But...It's a bit bigger than the 706... Also, the 706 has a detachable faceplate. I've been eyeballing the IC-7000 that is supposed to be coming out. It's like a 706 on steroids...Color "pro" style readout, more lights, blinky things, etc... Will probably trade to one of those for a mobile if the price drops down...Although a TS-2000 is tempting...The 2000 is a handy radio. Can crossband repeat, work sat's full duplex, etc, etc.. I've talked on 160m before by talking across town on UHF, using the 706, to a TS-2000 that received me on UHF, and then retransmitted on 160m.. Being he had a big amp on the ts-2000, I was actually louder on 160m going to his radio, than actually using mine on 160m, being I don't have a amp on 160m.. :/ The day will be soon when you can get all that in a radio I bet.. If...., there is a large enough market for them... Radio in general is kinda dropping off vs the internet, etc, etc... MK |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "D. Peter Maus"
Organization: AT&T Worldnet Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:46:30 GMT Subject: What would your dream SW portable receiver look like? Greg wrote: From: "€ Dr. Artaud €" Organization: None Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:03:58 -0600 Subject: What would your dream SW portable receiver look like? wrote in news:1133683898.230776.237900 @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: 1. Quality table top grade with portable features, i.e. carrying strap, feet on bottom and edge opposite to strap, 13.8 V Operation. 2. Sensitive tuner with SSB capabilities with the option to add noise processors, Digital (ugh!), and other likely future needs without sending the unit to the manufacturer to have them installed. 3. Hi and Low Z inputs for the antenna, ergo wire and coax connectors. 4. All knobs parallel to the face of the radio (i.e. no small knobs that partially go inside of the radio). 5. All Buttons on the face of the radio. 6. Variable illumination for the display. 7. Front panel speaker with sufficient clairty and drive to avoid distortion. 8. Jacks for recording (audio and control), computer interface, audio line level out, and disconnect for receiver when unit is being used in conjunction with a transmitter. With the reduction in the price of memory, perhaps an internal memory that can record 2 hours of talk shows. 9. Variable programming options so that the radio can tune to several shows on several frequencies at different times. Perhaps an audio assessment circuit that prohibits the recording of nothing but static and stops the tape. 10. Not made in China. $700 to $900 price range would be OK. Dr. Artaud Sounds more or less like a Drake SW-8, my dream portable. Greg In all applicable seriousness, rare in my house (or so the chihuahua tells me) I've had trouble deciding with radio to drag with me to the North Woods. If it's not my Sat 650 Professional, it's my SW-8. SW-8 isn't the most sensitive off it's whip, but with random wire, or portable active, it's great fun when it's just me and the dog at the cabin. When it's not just me and the dog, I generally don't notice if there's a radio or not. You've got a couple of serious portables there. In a couple weeks I'm taking my family for a short, pre-Christmas vacation on the beach (Anna Maria Island, Fla.). My main portable is the modest but venerable RS DX-440. The last time I took it to the beach I heard more DX than ever before on that radio, using a 24' wind-up wire antenna. Great fun. Greg |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg wrote:
From: "D. Peter Maus" Organization: AT&T Worldnet Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:46:30 GMT Subject: What would your dream SW portable receiver look like? Greg wrote: From: "€ Dr. Artaud €" Organization: None Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:03:58 -0600 Subject: What would your dream SW portable receiver look like? wrote in news:1133683898.230776.237900 @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: 1. Quality table top grade with portable features, i.e. carrying strap, feet on bottom and edge opposite to strap, 13.8 V Operation. 2. Sensitive tuner with SSB capabilities with the option to add noise processors, Digital (ugh!), and other likely future needs without sending the unit to the manufacturer to have them installed. 3. Hi and Low Z inputs for the antenna, ergo wire and coax connectors. 4. All knobs parallel to the face of the radio (i.e. no small knobs that partially go inside of the radio). 5. All Buttons on the face of the radio. 6. Variable illumination for the display. 7. Front panel speaker with sufficient clairty and drive to avoid distortion. 8. Jacks for recording (audio and control), computer interface, audio line level out, and disconnect for receiver when unit is being used in conjunction with a transmitter. With the reduction in the price of memory, perhaps an internal memory that can record 2 hours of talk shows. 9. Variable programming options so that the radio can tune to several shows on several frequencies at different times. Perhaps an audio assessment circuit that prohibits the recording of nothing but static and stops the tape. 10. Not made in China. $700 to $900 price range would be OK. Dr. Artaud Sounds more or less like a Drake SW-8, my dream portable. Greg In all applicable seriousness, rare in my house (or so the chihuahua tells me) I've had trouble deciding with radio to drag with me to the North Woods. If it's not my Sat 650 Professional, it's my SW-8. SW-8 isn't the most sensitive off it's whip, but with random wire, or portable active, it's great fun when it's just me and the dog at the cabin. When it's not just me and the dog, I generally don't notice if there's a radio or not. You've got a couple of serious portables there. In a couple weeks I'm taking my family for a short, pre-Christmas vacation on the beach (Anna Maria Island, Fla.). My main portable is the modest but venerable RS DX-440. The last time I took it to the beach I heard more DX than ever before on that radio, using a 24' wind-up wire antenna. Great fun. Greg Well, these are only two of the many. House full of T/O's, and Hallicrafters clones. A handful of Grundigs, A couple of Panasonics, and one lonely Sony ICF-5900. About the only portable I've not played with is the RS badged Sangean. Any of them. I had an ATS 803, but an old high school buddy was looking for a radio, so I gave it to him. I did take an RF-B65 to the Gulf Coast recently, and got to listen in a relativelly noise free environment. Yeah, there's nothing quite like a good listening environment and a good radio. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wouldn't have a plastic cabinet cabinet,that's for sure!
cuhulin |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kenwood R-5000 (R5000) Receiver - Information and Resources | Shortwave | |||
FA - DX-398 Portable Shortwave Receiver. | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment |