LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old December 16th 05, 12:15 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
 
Posts: n/a
Default New User - New Receiver - Reception Questions


David wrote:
The XM capability only adds a few dollars (less than 5) to the cost of
the radio. The XM smart antenna option for $50 has the actual
satellite receiver on it. The E1 itself is just the human interface.


What I meant was that the XM-ready nature of the E1, actual XM hardware
costs aside, is what makes this radio so significantly more expensive
than some of the other high-end portables. My research seemed to
indicate that the E1 wouldn't offer significantly better reception on
the SW bands than the YB 400PE, so for a difference of $350+ it's not a
worthwhile investment.

Please do correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I came to undertand.

-P

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cambridge Soundworks CD740 Radio - Reception Questions ???? RHF Broadcasting 0 September 21st 04 04:43 AM
The main problem with Ham radio... Observer Policy 59 February 1st 04 08:43 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM
Entering Trunked Info Into 780: new user questions, please Robert11 Scanner 3 September 22nd 03 07:51 PM
Low reenlistment rate charlesb Policy 54 September 18th 03 02:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017