| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
David wrote: The XM capability only adds a few dollars (less than 5) to the cost of the radio. The XM smart antenna option for $50 has the actual satellite receiver on it. The E1 itself is just the human interface. What I meant was that the XM-ready nature of the E1, actual XM hardware costs aside, is what makes this radio so significantly more expensive than some of the other high-end portables. My research seemed to indicate that the E1 wouldn't offer significantly better reception on the SW bands than the YB 400PE, so for a difference of $350+ it's not a worthwhile investment. Please do correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I came to undertand. -P |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Cambridge Soundworks CD740 Radio - Reception Questions ???? | Broadcasting | |||
| The main problem with Ham radio... | Policy | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| Entering Trunked Info Into 780: new user questions, please | Scanner | |||
| Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||