www.globalnewsmatrix.com

Alright,, bushButtKissers,,, start dissin Global News Matrix.Them Freaks
at www.lucianne.com and www.pipelinenews.org diss all
websites that tell the TRUTH.
cuhulin

www.globalnewsmatrix.com Is bush on Drugs? (Yeah,that S.O.B.is and
has been snortin Cocaine for many,many years) Wrestled with the Iraq
problem on the South Lawn,eh? That S.O.B.AWOL MORON had plans to Attack
Iraq before his MORON A.. ever became the bought "prez"
cuhulin

"David" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:42:58 -0600, "MnMikew"
wrote:


Yes but the ONLY place this show up anywhere is in Davids left wing
blogsphere. The mainstream media(liberal) press would have had a hayday
with
this.

Yes David, liberal.
http://www.newsroom.ucla.edu/page.asp?RelNum=6664




''Most of the outlets were less liberal than Lieberman''

Nuff said.

The bias exists David, nuff said!

toTaLhAt wrote:

Bush violated articles 1 and 3 of the Constitution by reserving the
role of court oversight for himself and writing laws from the oval
office.

Bush violated the wiretapping act of 1965.

Bush violated the FISA Act.

Bush violated the Patriot Act.

Bush had ZERO authority to do what he did. The Congress at no time
changed any laws or gave any permission that would allow Bush to break
the law requiring court oversight.

....and a classic "shrub-ism" about the above on the TV news tonight, Dec
19 from his press conference.

Reporter: "Mr. President, why didn't you go through the courts?"

Da shrub: (*exact* quote) "I,....uh...I...uh,...... I...uh..." and then
his patented "deer caught in the headlights" look.

It's certainly nice to have a steady hand at the tiller.

"Carter, K8VT" wrote:

toTaLhAt wrote:

Bush violated articles 1 and 3 of the Constitution by reserving the
role of court oversight for himself and writing laws from the oval
office.

Bush violated the wiretapping act of 1965.

Bush violated the FISA Act.

Bush violated the Patriot Act.

Bush had ZERO authority to do what he did. The Congress at no time
changed any laws or gave any permission that would allow Bush to break
the law requiring court oversight.

...and a classic "shrub-ism" about the above on the TV news tonight, Dec
19 from his press conference.

Reporter: "Mr. President, why didn't you go through the courts?"

Da shrub: (*exact* quote) "I,....uh...I...uh,...... I...uh..." and then
his patented "deer caught in the headlights" look.

It's certainly nice to have a steady hand at the tiller.

It sure is! It's unfortunate for us all that he won't be able to run again in
2008.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:06:35 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



toTaLhAt wrote:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:10:29 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



"Carter, K8VT" wrote:

toTaLhAt wrote:

Bush violated articles 1 and 3 of the Constitution by reserving the
role of court oversight for himself and writing laws from the oval
office.

Bush violated the wiretapping act of 1965.

Bush violated the FISA Act.

Bush violated the Patriot Act.

Bush had ZERO authority to do what he did. The Congress at no time
changed any laws or gave any permission that would allow Bush to break
the law requiring court oversight.

...and a classic "shrub-ism" about the above on the TV news tonight, Dec
19 from his press conference.

Reporter: "Mr. President, why didn't you go through the courts?"

Da shrub: (*exact* quote) "I,....uh...I...uh,...... I...uh..." and then
his patented "deer caught in the headlights" look.

It's certainly nice to have a steady hand at the tiller.

It sure is! It's unfortunate for us all that he won't be able to run again in
2008.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


If Clinton had been spying on Americans ..the paranoid schizo cons
would be in full battle gear.

Didn't the Clintons indeed spy on Americans... I seem to remember a story abot a
lot of FBI files.

And that was for political purposes, this particular 'spying' as you call it is
for National Security purposes, 'tard boy.

LMFAO at the Liberal brain stem.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



Seem to remember... that's about all the proof tard boy cons offer.

Keep collecting those Canucky QSL's oh unemployed one.

LMAO at the brainless wonder - simply boggles..

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 02:13:10 GMT, toTaLhAt
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:48:18 GMT, David wrote:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:24:37 -0600, wrote:

Largest theft of explosives in U.S.........
www.homelandsecurityus.com

Homeland Security???? it should be called (I am not refering to Douglas
Hagmann's website or Northeast Intelligence or
www.homelandsecurity.com in this instance) Homeland INsecurity.
cuhulin

Give me Liberty or give me death.


Rather than stand resolutely in favor of their essential liberties by
enduring the possibility of terrorist attack, cons are sniveling
cowards who spit upon the graves of the tens of thousands of Americans
who DIED to earn us these freedoms by giving them away so easily.

"Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."--Benjamin Franklin

Good to see another Patriot. The founders sacrificed everything they
had, as did Washingtons Army. They could have gone on ''safely'' and
''securely'' forever but they chose to be rid of their tyrannical
''protector''.

The Declaration of Independence was written especially for Bush and
Cheney.

On 19 Dec 2005 18:08:55 -0800, "RHF"
wrote:
[the ususal small toe deep critical thinking]
What part of ''pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law'' do you
not comprehend?

Tyrants always have a war going so they can use the ''national
security'' ruse to justify bad behavior. Our founders knew this and
the Constitution makes no such allowances.

"toTaLhAt" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:10:29 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



"Carter, K8VT" wrote:

toTaLhAt wrote:

Bush violated articles 1 and 3 of the Constitution by reserving the
role of court oversight for himself and writing laws from the oval
office.

Bush violated the wiretapping act of 1965.

Bush violated the FISA Act.

Bush violated the Patriot Act.

Bush had ZERO authority to do what he did. The Congress at no time
changed any laws or gave any permission that would allow Bush to
break
the law requiring court oversight.

...and a classic "shrub-ism" about the above on the TV news tonight,
Dec
19 from his press conference.

Reporter: "Mr. President, why didn't you go through the courts?"

Da shrub: (*exact* quote) "I,....uh...I...uh,...... I...uh..." and then
his patented "deer caught in the headlights" look.

It's certainly nice to have a steady hand at the tiller.

It sure is! It's unfortunate for us all that he won't be able to run
again in
2008.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



If Clinton had been spying on Americans ..the paranoid schizo cons
would be in full battle gear.

What makes you think he wasn't? Who's paranoid?

"David" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 02:13:10 GMT, toTaLhAt
wrote:

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:48:18 GMT, David wrote:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:24:37 -0600, wrote:

Largest theft of explosives in U.S.........
www.homelandsecurityus.com

Homeland Security???? it should be called (I am not refering to Douglas
Hagmann's website or Northeast Intelligence or
www.homelandsecurity.com in this instance) Homeland INsecurity.
cuhulin

Give me Liberty or give me death.


Rather than stand resolutely in favor of their essential liberties by
enduring the possibility of terrorist attack, cons are sniveling
cowards who spit upon the graves of the tens of thousands of Americans
who DIED to earn us these freedoms by giving them away so easily.

"Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."--Benjamin Franklin

Good to see another Patriot. The founders sacrificed everything they
had, as did Washingtons Army. They could have gone on ''safely'' and
''securely'' forever but they chose to be rid of their tyrannical
''protector''.

The Declaration of Independence was written especially for Bush and
Cheney.

You two should get a room. A rubber room that is.