http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...html?gusrc=rss

I don't recall that it was being reported as "smooth" at all. I don't
think anyone expected that it would go smoothly; and frankly, even if
the election was on the up-and-up, how could anyone expect that one
group or another in Iraq would not challenge the results if they didn't
get their own slate elected? Surely our own relatively well-run US
elections have taught us that many things can and do wrong, not the
least of which is heated bickering afterwards.

There is absoutely nothing surprising about the aftermath so far.
Disappointing perhaps, but completely predictable.

Bruce Jensen

On 23 Dec 2005 07:34:51 -0800, "bpnjensen"
wrote:

I don't recall that it was being reported as "smooth" at all. I don't
think anyone expected that it would go smoothly; and frankly, even if
the election was on the up-and-up, how could anyone expect that one
group or another in Iraq would not challenge the results if they didn't
get their own slate elected? Surely our own relatively well-run US
elections have taught us that many things can and do wrong, not the
least of which is heated bickering afterwards.

There is absoutely nothing surprising about the aftermath so far.
Disappointing perhaps, but completely predictable.

Bruce Jensen

The difference is that Iraqis have enouh balls to take to the streets
when they get robbed in the voting booths.

David wrote:

On 23 Dec 2005 07:34:51 -0800, "bpnjensen"
wrote:

I don't recall that it was being reported as "smooth" at all. I don't
think anyone expected that it would go smoothly; and frankly, even if
the election was on the up-and-up, how could anyone expect that one
group or another in Iraq would not challenge the results if they didn't
get their own slate elected? Surely our own relatively well-run US
elections have taught us that many things can and do wrong, not the
least of which is heated bickering afterwards.

There is absoutely nothing surprising about the aftermath so far.
Disappointing perhaps, but completely predictable.

Bruce Jensen

The difference is that Iraqis have enouh balls to take to the streets
when they get robbed in the voting booths.

Well, you certainly don't have any!

LMFAO yet again at the mentally ill 'tard boy known as David Rickets!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

DaviD - So Big Mouth . . . Why Aren't 'you' In-The-Streets ?

DaviD - All 'want-to-be' Talk and No Action [.]

DaviD - In 2000 why weren't you In-The-Streets in Miami ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_2000_swing_states

DaviD - In 2004 why weren't you In-The-Streets in Ohio etc ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_2004_swing_states

DaviD - US Presidential Candidate Hillary R. Clinton has a
place especially for 'you' on top of the Barricades in 2008
DaviD - Will 'you' Be There ? or wimp-out again ?

DaviD - the cause, The Cause. THE CAUSE !
Needs 'you' - Will 'you' Answer the Call ?

DaviD - mia ~ RHF

Stop beating around the BUSH and get to the heart of the matter DR David.
Your pickings of "select" mainstream media stories, which you yourself claim
to be hard right liars, exposes you for what you truly are - a useful idiot.

"David" wrote in message
...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...html?gusrc=rss

SeeingEyeDog wrote:

Stop beating around the BUSH and get to the heart of the matter DR David.
Your pickings of "select" mainstream media stories, which you yourself claim
to be hard right liars, exposes you for what you truly are - a useful idiot.

Also a dumbass mentally ill 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Stop beating around the BUSH and get to the heart of the matter DR David.
Your pickings of "select" mainstream media stories, which you yourself claim
to be hard right liars, exposes you for what you truly are - a useful idiot.


Also a dumbass mentally ill 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

What are you feebs gonna do when Bush is no longer in office and
there's no one to blame everything on? Fight amongst yourselves?

gtt