Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() clifto wrote: an old friend wrote: clifto wrote: cut The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that there would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually pushed no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame question pool already used for Technician licenses. who made this promise? I got it indirectly, so I don't know. But I got it from people I trusted, and still trust. prehaps your trust is misplaced the only body with the POWER to make that promise and keep was the FCC, today the NEVEC could make it but then only the FCC, and I have found no evidence they ever made any such promise I have Heard the ARRL said something like this may have been said by the ARRL but they lack the power to make such a pledge -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | CB |