sounds like teletype
Hi,
Sometimes when I'm runing in stations with my grundig-fr200 radio I hear something that sounds like teletype or really fast morse code. what is this? Josh -- he should try out the animal before he bought him. He took the could. The Bear soon left him, for it is said he will not touch-land... A RIVER carried down in its stream two Pots, one made of pounce upon in a whole year. Evil wishes, like chickens, come home to roost. |
sounds like teletype
Sometimes when I'm runing in stations with my
grundig-fr200 radio I hear something that sounds like teletype or really fast morse code. what is this? Could be WEFAX, FAX, RTTY, SSTV, PACTOR, NAVTEX, some packet-based FSK mode etc. You don't give us much to narrow it down. Sometimes they intersperse CW ID's in among the deedle-deedles. Tim. |
sounds like teletype
what is ssb?
Josh -- email: msn messenger or windows messenger: AOL or AIM: kutztownstudent "Radio TexMex" wrote in message ... Josh wrote: Hi, Sometimes when I'm runing in stations with my grundig-fr200 radio I hear something that sounds like teletype or really fast morse code. what is this? Josh Most likely RTTY or some other digital mode. If your radio receives SSB, you ought to try and decode it with some of these software RTTY readers out there. |
sounds like teletype
Josh wrote:
what is ssb? Josh Single Side Band mode is a modulated signal without the AM carrier. You usually don't want a carrier in the way when trying to use most data modes: He http://www.sgcworld.com/whatisssbtechnote.html Read up! Have fun! - Matt |
sounds like teletype
Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff
that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. -- jhhaynes at earthlink dot net |
sounds like teletype
|
sounds like teletype
Telamon wrote:
In article . net, (Jim Haynes) wrote: Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. I'm not a ham and don't know the rules but it might be illegal for them to use encryption. If this is not true I'm sure someone will correct my speculation. We're probably talking government and military data comms. In that case, it would be essential to encrypt it. Private services have moved to satellite for the most part. The military needs the mobility that shortwave provides-you can't haul a satellite dish around Baghdad, even a small one. Private organizations don't, so they use satellite. |
sounds like teletype
"running dogg" wrote in message ... Telamon wrote: In article . net, (Jim Haynes) wrote: Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. I'm not a ham and don't know the rules but it might be illegal for them to use encryption. If this is not true I'm sure someone will correct my speculation. We're probably talking government and military data comms. In that case, it would be essential to encrypt it. Private services have moved to satellite for the most part. The military needs the mobility that shortwave provides-you can't haul a satellite dish around Baghdad, even a small one. Private organizations don't, so they use satellite. HF is used commercially to send data to ships. http://www.globewireless.com/solutio...t1_hfradio.php HF is useful for communicating with planes over the ocean. http://spacecom.grc.nasa.gov/icnsconf/docs/2003/04_B1/B1-05-deBarros.pdf#search='hfdl' -- rb |
sounds like teletype
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . net, (Jim Haynes) wrote: Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. I'm not a ham and don't know the rules but it might be illegal for them to use encryption. If this is not true I'm sure someone will correct my speculation. You are correct. Hams are prohibited from sending coded communications. -- rb |
sounds like teletype
"Josh" wrote in message ... Hi, Sometimes when I'm runing in stations with my grundig-fr200 radio I hear something that sounds like teletype or really fast morse code. what is this? What frequencies? -- rb |
sounds like teletype
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . net, (Jim Haynes) wrote: Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. I'm not a ham and don't know the rules but it might be illegal for them to use encryption. If this is not true I'm sure someone will correct my speculation. You are correct. Hams are prohibited from sending coded communications. How do you explain CW? -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
sounds like teletype
Brian Denley wrote: Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . net, (Jim Haynes) wrote: Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. I'm not a ham and don't know the rules but it might be illegal for them to use encryption. If this is not true I'm sure someone will correct my speculation. You are correct. Hams are prohibited from sending coded communications. How do you explain CW? an aside I find it amusing that a memebr of NCI is explain this but Ron Baker's statement is incorrect because it is incomplete he should have type (caps mine) "Hams are prohibited from sending SECRECTLY coded communications." Morse Encoded OOKed CW is not asecert the same rule allows PSK #! the code is known, there was a discusion last July i think on RRAP to the effect that Likely a coded messge by some PGP could be send over ARS if the loctcation of all the keys were tranmited in the clear. it was alsoagreed that the FCC would likely fght that battle out -- Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html |
sounds like teletype
"Brian Denley" wrote in message ... Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . net, (Jim Haynes) wrote: Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. I'm not a ham and don't know the rules but it might be illegal for them to use encryption. If this is not true I'm sure someone will correct my speculation. You are correct. Hams are prohibited from sending coded communications. How do you explain CW? I beg forgiveness. Strike 'coded' and insert 'encrypted'. -- rb |
sounds like teletype
You are not even supposed to speak in code. Yet somehow, speaking in a
foreign language on repeaters is considered acceptable, though not by me. Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . net, (Jim Haynes) wrote: Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. I'm not a ham and don't know the rules but it might be illegal for them to use encryption. If this is not true I'm sure someone will correct my speculation. You are correct. Hams are prohibited from sending coded communications. -- rb |
sounds like teletype
wrote:
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . net, (Jim Haynes) wrote: Except for the amateur radio bands, there is very very little stuff that sounds like teletype that is decodable these days. Most of what you hear is synchronous and probably encrypted. I'm not a ham and don't know the rules but it might be illegal for them to use encryption. If this is not true I'm sure someone will correct my speculation. You are correct. Hams are prohibited from sending coded communications. You are not even supposed to speak in code. Yet somehow, speaking in a foreign language on repeaters is considered acceptable, though not by me. There was a period when FCC considered ASCII to be a "secret code", and prohibited its on-air use by hams. Seriously. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
sounds like teletype
When webtv first came out,it was illegal to transport a webtv unit to
any foreign countries because of 128 bit encryption.Look it up. cuhulin |
sounds like teletype
|
sounds like teletype
Heck,better than that,,, just invent some kind of a language nobody has
ever heard of before and use that to email people.Change it entirely every once in a while so as to keep fed govt on their toes. cuhulin |
sounds like teletype
running dogg wrote:
Anybody remember the fuss over PGP (Pretty Good Privacy), a freeware encryption program that came out in the early days of the public internet? The feds HATED it because they were afraid that high grade encryption would fall into the hands of our enemies. It never caught on, and the NSA likely cracked the code, so they stopped making a fuss about it and now nobody remembers it. I have always been suspicious since the time MIT (?) said, "you can't use this version of it, but you can use this other version which is exactly like the other version in every respect." Somehow I never believed the new version was like the old version in every respect. -- If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com