Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Frank Dresser" wrote: "Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message ... [snip] That said, I think IBOC is going to fail of its own volition. On AM, it'll never sell to the vast majority of stations unless it can be left on all night. But if it *is* left on all night, the massive interference will kill the AM service altogether. Nighttime IBOC might not kill AM radio, but it sure will make most fringe reception impossible. I've recently spent some time in California and the nighttime jumble of ground wave, skywave and adjacents is even worse than what I'm used to here in the Midwest. I can imagine the damage IBOC will cause. Snip I grew up in western New York and don't recall AMBCB stations having the amount of selective fading as they do here in southern california. Night time AM broadcast band here in southern California is terrible most nights with selective fading where the station can be completely unintelligible for up to a minute or two even with continuously strong signal levels. Back east the AMBCB or short wave stations would just have the "normal" signal strength fading where the signal strength would drop so it could not be heard momentarily. I have as a consequence found sync detection indispensable for night time AMBCB and the majority of short wave reception is much improved with it. Recall that I am a program listener so I spend hours listening to a broadcast and don't want to miss parts of it. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here is "Why" I am 'skeptical' about DRM and IBOC | Shortwave | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
The AM IBOC mess is yet to begin... | Broadcasting |