Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric F. Richards wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote: Those days are long gone. But remember, a jock acknowledging a long distance listener on the air, is and was even then, largely a novelty. It doesn't reflect what's happening in the PD's office with the Arbitron book, or how they compute rates for the Sales department. Working in Chicago, having listeners in South Fox Crotch, Tennesee is good for the ego. Hell, I sat in for the night jock one evening at KWKH and took a request from Crayford, south of London. A great stroke. But hardly saleable. And in the US, Radio is always about the money. Actually, my favorite acknowledgement was from a college party in Miami. I personally listened because I was a geek and thought it was cool, and it became VERY interesting listening during the blackout of 77. Now, CKLW is not representative of what happens in radio in the US. At time to which you refer, radio stations in Canada were licenses to print money. There were more radio stations in Illinois than the whole of Canada, and the Canadian model for broadcast is vastly different than it is in the US, specifically because of the large unserved areas between radio stations. But CKLW's target was the US, not Canada at all, and they made no bones about it. I'm sure they were in Windsor rather than Detroit because of costs, but their target audience was south of the border. For that matter, last time I was in San Diego (quite some time ago, actually), the dial was packed with stations in Mexico targeting SD. You make my point for me. Again, the target audience is of limited size. Because there's no practical sales value beyond a certain point. Audience for CKLW is for practical purposes outside of the ADI, unmeasurable. Where there is a measured audience, it's small compared to the locals, and not saleable. But even if it were comparatively large, and I've worked in markets downstate where WLS and WGN were rated and contenders against the locals, there still wasn't a practical sales value. So, for all intents that matter, that audience isn't a consideration. Hence IBOC interference issues outside of the ADI are not a consideration. If you're going to argue objectionable interference, it has to be within the ADI. As for the CKLW target. Practically speaking, the were a Detroit station. And they sold the Detroit market. Nonetheless, they were a Canadian station, and different rules, different business models apply than those for US stations. Targets are one thing. Rules are another. And location determines the rules. Not targets. One of the things that's easily forgotten, is that Radio is an entertainment business. (loose definitions apply.) What you hear is often not really what it seems. There's a lot behind the curtain that is intentionally not on display before the listening audience. Meaning that what you hear is often not what you get. A long distance dedication is a great ego boost to the jocks at the station and the PD running the show. It's great to have your name smeared across multiple states. But as a practical business tool, it's only an imaginary benefit. The business model is something quite different. And practical realities far more limited than what's implied to those on your side of the grille cloth. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
Why I Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
LQQKing for Construction Article | Antenna |