Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Because the others are not usable by the average listener. Mexico, and many other Hemisphere countries, license MW every 20 kHz in the local market. What does that have to do with us, gringa? If you want to discuss, cut out the stupid efforts to offend. They are merely distractions. What it has to do with the USA is that the AM rules were mostly written in the 30's when night AM reception was where most tune-ins occured. Today, most AM listening is in daytime hours, on receivers that are musch more selective. So the adjacent channel rules are simply 50 years out of date, and do not reflect current analog technology or the use of radio. And what the hell does that have to do with QRMing two adjacent channels? It is only objectionable if people have regular listening disturbed by it. They don't. Pull your head out of your ass, little girl, and stop being a shill for iBiquity. The system is good. Better than any other alternative. You got your head up your ass, gringa! dxAce Michigan USA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
Why I Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
LQQKing for Construction Article | Antenna |