| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
They work well in a low local noise location.
As will nearly anything. A random or long wire could be a good reference antenna against a new design. To me, a random wire would be a poor reference antenna. To me, there are basically two reference antennas. The horizontal dipole, which would be the reference for horizontal antennas, and the 1/4 monopole, which would be a reference to compare against vertical antennas. For elevated verticals, I use the 1/4 wave ground plane as the reference antenna. A random wire is much too random. The antennas I use as benchmarks all have well known and repeatable performance. All my horizontal wire antennas are compared to the 1/2 wave dipole. BTW, not many win either, unless they are gain antennas. As far as efficiency on a certain band, it's hard to beat a coax fed dipole. And thusly, it's my usual "benchmark" antenna. MK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| For Shortwave Listening (SWL) here is a "Simpler" Horizontal Loop Antenna in the Attic using common TV type Parts | Shortwave | |||
| Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
| Make your own T2FD | Shortwave | |||
| I wonder... | Shortwave | |||