Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:03:55 -0700, running dogg wrote:
I don't listen to shortwave radio for hours at a stretch. At best, I'll listen to a half hour of news on the BBC, and RHC's 10 minute news bulletin-per night. I don't listen to much music. Now tell me again, David, why I should pay $13/mo for something I'll only use for 2 1/2 hours per week (BBC doesn't have current events coverage on weekends)? That's about 80 cents an hour. Pricey. I doubt that most people listen to any more than one or two of satellite radio's dozens of channels. When Howard Stern moved to Sirius, only about a third of his over the air fan base moved with him, leading Stern to berate his former fans as cheap. Satellite radio isn't worth the cost for all but the most dedicated users. Considering that most people watch 6 hours of TV a day, cable TV is cheap. But most people don't listen to the radio for hours on end. You don't really need shortwave radio or satellite, either, for BBC. It's on most NPR radio stations daily, several times throughout the day and/or night. bob k5qwg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|