Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:00:17 -0500, wrote: I never have liked ssb.For one thing,there isn't anything on ssb worth listening to.Unless you want to know how to fry eggs in a skillet.Another thing,ssb sounds "muddy'',,, not worth the time and effort to tune in ssb.Too Much Money For The Amount Of Bread! cuhulin That makes absolutely no sense. Have you ever played with a real radio? SSB can be incredibly clear and quiet. I agree. A good radio with sufficiently fine tuning can make ssb transmissions crystal clear. For a real aural treat catch one of the nets that sends in AM. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"John S." wrote: David wrote: On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:00:17 -0500, wrote: I never have liked ssb.For one thing,there isn't anything on ssb worth listening to.Unless you want to know how to fry eggs in a skillet.Another thing,ssb sounds "muddy'',,, not worth the time and effort to tune in ssb.Too Much Money For The Amount Of Bread! That makes absolutely no sense. Have you ever played with a real radio? SSB can be incredibly clear and quiet. I agree. A good radio with sufficiently fine tuning can make ssb transmissions crystal clear. For a real aural treat catch one of the nets that sends in AM. Use the slow AGC selection on the radio if it has one to quiet the noise between the words people speak on sideband. Careful main tuning (VFO), passband tuning and filter selection will cause the sound quality to be very good and not muddy. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You use it,I dont like it.(ssb)
cuhulin |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|