Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 12:37:43 GMT, David wrote:
On 23 Apr 2006 00:38:18 -0700, "RHF" wrote: For One and All, Per "Telamon" - A Hertzian Antenna such as a Dipole has two elements that develop the Voltage across the Receiver Input - - - So an RF Ground becomes superfluous. This Statement may be True a the specific Frequency that the Dipole is Designed to Operate at {Resonance} . "IS" this Statement always True at other Frequencies that the Dipole was NOT Designed to Operate at {Non-Resonant} ? QUESTION - Does a "Non-Resonant" Dipole Antenna work better {Benefit} when a Receiver is RF Grounded in the Shack ? ? ? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortw...a/message/9189 i want to know - cause iane ~ RHF . Shortwave Listener Antennas = http://tinyurl.com/ogvcf http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortwave-SWL-Antenna/ SWL Antenna Group = http://tinyurl.com/ogvcf . I suggest you find a nice copy of the ARRL Antenna book and put it in your ****ter for a few months. Yes, please... see: http://www.arrl.org/catalog/?categor... gation&words= bob k5qwg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Ground Rod Selection | Shortwave | |||
Ground Rod Selection | Shortwave | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |