Sangean 404
 

On Sun, 14 May 2006 21:51:17 GMT, Billy Smith
wrote:

David wrote:

On Sat, 13 May 2006 17:39:21 -0400, S Walters
wrote:


I am considering a small digital shortwave set for travel purposes and
am considering the Sangean 404 and the Sony SW35. I have a Sony 7600GR
and a Kaito WRX911 and am a regular SWL so I know a little something
about portable shortwave radios. How is the build quality on the
Sangean 404? Iwant a radio that can stand up to being carried around
and not fall apart after six months. My Sony "GR" is too nice to be
carrying around. I would hate for something to happen to it. The Kaito
911 is good but I want the sleep timer and alarm clock features as well
as a lighted display for night time use. I like the SW35 but the Sangean
404 has direct entry tuning which is a real plus. I have read good and
bad reviews on both and since no local stores carry either, I can't test
them out. Build quality is first and foremost. I have a Sangean 622
which is not a bad set but performance could be better. Of the 404 or
SW35, which is the better built radio?

Single Conversion radios tend to whistle and whine a lot.


I had a cheap Chinese single conversion radio years ago back in the late
90s and all it did was whine and whistle. Still could pick up most of
the major broadcasters though. BBC, Australia, DW etc.
They're not too terrible in the boonies, but if you're in a big city
or near the coast there are just too many hets all over the place.

Sangean 404
 

S Walters wrote:

wrote:

- Might consider the Shirt pocket sized Degen De1105

http://www.radiointel.com/review-degende1105.htm


Nice little set

That is a nice little set. I can't help but wonder if the adhesive that
holds that aluminum front panel on might give way over time. I have
seen brushed aluminum trim on many radios come loose in the past.


That is easy enough to fix. A few drops of contact cement and it
will never come back off. I have glued hundreds of aluminum trim parts
back on radios and TVs over the last 30 years and never had one come
loose.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Sangean 404
 

"Billy Smith" wrote in message
k.net...
wrote:

Single conversion people tend to,,,,,,, awwww,I wont say that.
I would go for the Sony radio.
cuhulin


Single conversion radios generally suck. You want at least a double or
triple conversion receiver. With the price of them being quite low either
a Icom R 75 or similar receiver would be good. That or something like a
Sony 7600 GR. In fact, I am wanting a 7600 myself

That may be true about a lot of sets with mediocre front ends and terrible
selectivity etc.. but there were some very good single conversion sets made
over the years, especially during the mid thirties until after the war.
There's allot of ways to skin a cat when it comes to receiver design.

--

Regards
B.H.

Brian's Basement
http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/6.htm

Brian's Radio Universe
http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/500.htm