![]() |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
Brenda Ann wrote:
They can market them all they want. I don't know anyone personally that will buy one. I'd buy one for $10 if it had a usable line out I could feed my stereo gear. Much more than that, and it's just not worth it to hear talk radio or Spanish music. -- Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... They can market them all they want. I don't know anyone personally that will buy one. I would not expect you would. Niether do I.. The consumer martketing just began this monthy. It's in a very early phase. They're just not willing to spend the sort of money to replace something that's been working just fine for them. What sort of money? You obviously don't know the price points of the next wave of receivers. And I doubt seriously that much of the general populus will want to replace the 5-10 analog radios they already have just for a joke of a digital signal. A signal which sounds better, doubles the FM station count, and gives AM decent quality. And it's "digital" which means a lot to the consumer. You keep talking about the contours.. well, those may look good on paper, they don't work in real life situations. That's amusing. We have two dozen of these on the air already, and in every case, the usable contour is greater for HD than for analog. The biggest benefit is to major market AMs where the ambient noise level means coverage is very limited. For FMs, we are finding a usable HD signal that goes beyond the 64 dbu, which is where almost all rated listening stops on analog. And rated listeners are all we care about, as that is how we make money. And that is the way it has been of 80 years or so. You'll learn that when people start tuning out of your stations en-masse. Funny, but nearly all our stations were up in Winter, including the HD enabled ones. Addin HD does not affect the ratings of the analog signal. It just expands th epotential for the future. I know that personally, I will never spend the money on IBOC receiving equipment. Since you don't even know how much it will cost in the next 18 months, that is a ludicrous statement. I won't spend a cent to replace something that has always worked with something of questionable value in general and no value whatsoever to me. Most people will feel that having twice the FM "stations" is well worht it. One time cost, tangible gain. IBOC interferes with adjacent channel stations. This is just poor engineering, and something that would never have been allowed in the days when the FCC was composed of engineers instead of greedy politicians. Since there is scan evidence that the adjacents are being listened to in the areas where the interference happens, this is irrelevant. I was just talking to a friend of mine on the Oregon coast who has been listening regularly to KONA in the tri-cities on 610 for decades. He can no longer listen to it because KPOJ 620 in Portland turned on their IBOC and is splattering 15KHz either side of their carrier. You can do your best to talk up this boondoggle, but most of us see it for what it is.. just another way for the NAB to screw the little guy, including the listeners. Actually, this was not an NAB project. The promotion of it is not NAB. The engineering was not NAB. A bunch of group owners decided that radio had to move into the digital domain, and financed iBiquity's early stock offerings. Some of the early adopters are small, like UnoRadio Group, a Puerto Rican company that is owned by a lifetime engineer who believes this is the best hope of radio for the future. So few people listen to far-off signals and so many will leave radio altogether if we do not modernize delivery that this is a small price to pay to stay off obselecence. I think you'll find that rather than buy expensive new radios, They will not be expensive as they roll out. My first CD player was $1,400. My first DVD player was nearly $700. My first VHS was over $800. My first walkman CD player was nearly $300. Now there are $19 DVD players, $14 CD walkman players and nobody wants a VHS device. that listeners will just turn off their radios and go to other entertainment modes.. this is already largely the case with Ipods, portable CD and MD players, etc. Which have been studied and found to not compete with radio, but, in many cases, create more radio listening. Just as 45's and cassettes and CDs did. They are complimentary. Most young people don't even own a radio anymore, it's too easy for them to get the music they want, load it onto a personal portable device, and hear what they want, when they want, without incessant DJ patter and endless advertisements. Radio does not program to young people. It can not afford to. Yet, 93% of teens use radio weekly, so your data is just about totally wrong. You have some kind of emotional reaction to this that does not allow you to see the reality of pricing, radio usage or the "digital" phenomenon. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... In every market, we have had good HD experiences on AM and FM... NY, Miami, Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Phoenix, LA, San Diego, San Francisco, etc. All our engineers like it, and love the sound. I call BS. I have personal reports that AM IBOC cannot be heard in downtown Manhattan on a display radio. I know ESB stations that can not be heard in stores 6 blocks away. Manhattan is a horrible place for FM. The fact is, our WCAA on HD has better usable coverage and better building penetration than the analog signal. As I have said, we are finding this to be uniformly true, which is why nearly all our 70 stations will be HD by the end of next year. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: Since nobody answered the modem, you were NOT contacted. Your phone line was attempted, and discarded when it did not have a human on the other end. Actually I was contacted -- by mail. Got the dollar bill and everything. But when I told them it wasn't my primary phone number they lost interest. Original contact is made by pone, not mail. So you are lying or changing the order of things. They also sent the dollar bill and contact information to the water system's billing address. The water association got a big laugh over it. Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. Don't tell me I wasn't contacted when I was. Once again it shows you to be in a bubble of unreality. I just checked with a person at Arbitron. The MRC approved methodology is phone contact followed by mailing of a BOX with the diary in it along with the incentive, phone confirmation of receipt, phone follow up after day 1, phone follow up after weekend, phone follow-up on Thursday for completion and mail-back. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... Yeah, well, *extremely* heavy emphasis has to be placed on "noise free" in order for this claim to be true. Otherwise it is patently false. Listeners do no significantly use metro AMs outside the 10 mv/m and FMs outside the 64 dbu, with 85% of listening in the 70 debu. The HD signal exceeds this. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... David Eduardo wrote: In every market, we have had good HD experiences on AM and FM... NY, Miami, Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Phoenix, LA, San Diego, San Francisco, etc. All our engineers like it, and love the sound. I'm glad your engineers are happy, but I suspect your advertisers are aiming at a slightly larger listening audience. We had our highest total ratings ever in Winter 2006. The advertisers are happy. Our company was awarded the only A+ for ratings performance by an investment firm that tracks radio as an industry. The HD signal exceeds the USABLE Am and FM coutours in every case... unless you are using the Boston Acoustics Receptor, which is a bad HD radio. Unless you have unreasonably high standards for what counts as 'usable', this is simply false. My standard is the contours where listening occurs. there have been plenty of studies of where most listening occurs, and where the drop-off contours are. Most of us have been tracking this sort of stuff since the 70's. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"clifto" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: They can market them all they want. I don't know anyone personally that will buy one. I'd buy one for $10 if it had a usable line out I could feed my stereo gear. Much more than that, and it's just not worth it to hear talk radio or Spanish music. I did not know there was any station in the US that played much music from Spain. Of course, you meant "music in Spanish" I assume. ;-) |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
I have a personal repote.But you probally dont want to hear it because I
am really a dirty old man. cuhulin |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"David Eduardo" wrote:
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: Since nobody answered the modem, you were NOT contacted. Your phone line was attempted, and discarded when it did not have a human on the other end. Actually I was contacted -- by mail. Got the dollar bill and everything. But when I told them it wasn't my primary phone number they lost interest. Original contact is made by pone, not mail. So you are lying or changing the order of things. Well, you better tell Arbitron that it has an imposter, then. They also sent the dollar bill and contact information to the water system's billing address. The water association got a big laugh over it. Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. "BE PART OF THE RADIO RATINGS! "Whether you listen a little, a lot, or not at all, you are important. Yours is one of the few households in your area chosen to tell radio stations what you listen to. "It's easy and fun to take part in our radio survey. In just a few days, an Arbitron reasearch assistant will call with more details. Or, here is how to get started right away: "o Call 1-800-638-7091 and ask to speak with an Arbitron research assistant, or "o Enroll on line at www.enroll.arbitronratings.com by using the following serial number (ed: deleted) "Thanks for your help, "/s/ Steve Morris "President, Arbitron Ratings "PS: Please accept the small token of appreciation we have enclosed with the letter." ....but clearly again you know better than this letter how they recruit. Jeez, your idiocy never ends, does it? Don't tell me I wasn't contacted when I was. Once again it shows you to be in a bubble of unreality. I just checked with a person at Arbitron. The MRC approved methodology is phone contact followed by mailing of a BOX with the diary in it along with the incentive, phone confirmation of receipt, phone follow up after day 1, phone follow up after weekend, phone follow-up on Thursday for completion and mail-back. -- Eric F. Richards, "It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to create value. While it’s possible to make money in the short run without creating much value, in the long run it’s unsustainable. Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone." - Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006 |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
clifto wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote... Arbitron will never figure it out, too. Arbitron uses a percentage of RDD calls (Random Digit Dialing) to know prefixes. This is to pick up unlisted phones in proportion with their presence in each metro. Some will be inactive. Some will not answer. Some will be faxes. So they perform enough calls to get the proper quota of unlisted numbers to get market proportionality. It doesn't matter that the comedian expected to get the pie in his face, it's still funny to watch it happen. I dunno if you mean me or him. Below I enclosed the entire text of the letter sent to me, then having been rejected after they found out my modem phone number wasn't my primary voice mail -- their online registration actually told me that I wasn't the person at that number. The flat earth society lives -- at Arbitron and in the mind of Eduardo. -- Eric F. Richards, "It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to create value. While it’s possible to make money in the short run without creating much value, in the long run it’s unsustainable. Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone." - Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006 |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"David Eduardo" wrote:
[...] Original contact is made by pone, not mail. So you are lying or changing the order of things. [...] Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. http://www.dim.com/~efricha/arbitron.gif Next excuse? -- Eric F. Richards, "It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to create value. While it’s possible to make money in the short run without creating much value, in the long run it’s unsustainable. Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone." - Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006 |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
Eric F. Richards wrote:
"David Eduardo" wrote: [...] Original contact is made by pone, not mail. So you are lying or changing the order of things. [...] Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. http://www.dim.com/~efricha/arbitron.gif Or http://www.dim.com/~efricha/arbitron.png for usable quality Next excuse? |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. "BE PART OF THE RADIO RATINGS! "Whether you listen a little, a lot, or not at all, you are important. Yours is one of the few households in your area chosen to tell radio stations what you listen to. "It's easy and fun to take part in our radio survey. In just a few days, an Arbitron reasearch assistant will call with more details. Or, here is how to get started right away: "o Call 1-800-638-7091 and ask to speak with an Arbitron research assistant, or "o Enroll on line at www.enroll.arbitronratings.com by using the following serial number (ed: deleted) "Thanks for your help, "/s/ Steve Morris "President, Arbitron Ratings "PS: Please accept the small token of appreciation we have enclosed with the letter." ...but clearly again you know better than this letter how they recruit. Jeez, your idiocy never ends, does it? As I said, they do not recruit by mail. The phone call is what decides whether you are going to get the diary or not. There are a battery of questions asked on the phone call, starting with the media household question, that can ace or nix the participation. The letter is merely a setup for the phone recruit. If you are in a cell they have filled quota for, you are out (age, ethnicity, sex, geography). If the data for the contact does not match the data of the contact, they nix you (to keep the "letter" from being passed around). And so on. Just in case you missed it... the mthodology is based on acceptance of a person / household via the phone contact. The letter is an experimental procedure, used to see if it will increase participation at the time of the recruitment call. The real incentive is sent with the diaries. I just checked with a person at Arbitron. The MRC approved methodology is phone contact followed by mailing of a BOX with the diary in it along with the incentive, phone confirmation of receipt, phone follow up after day 1, phone follow up after weekend, phone follow-up on Thursday for completion and mail-back. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... clifto wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote... Arbitron will never figure it out, too. Arbitron uses a percentage of RDD calls (Random Digit Dialing) to know prefixes. This is to pick up unlisted phones in proportion with their presence in each metro. Some will be inactive. Some will not answer. Some will be faxes. So they perform enough calls to get the proper quota of unlisted numbers to get market proportionality. It doesn't matter that the comedian expected to get the pie in his face, it's still funny to watch it happen. I dunno if you mean me or him. Below I enclosed the entire text of the letter sent to me, then having been rejected after they found out my modem phone number wasn't my primary voice mail -- their online registration actually told me that I wasn't the person at that number. The flat earth society lives -- at Arbitron and in the mind of Eduardo. As I said, the letter is a pre-contact to "warm the welcome" when the recruitment call is made. If anything does not match, they nix you. And that means using a different phone, because you could have passed the letter to a friend. In any case, the letter is an experimental technique to increase response rates and not generally used. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: [...] Original contact is made by pone, not mail. So you are lying or changing the order of things. [...] Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. http://www.dim.com/~efricha/arbitron.gif Next excuse? No argument. That is not a recruitment, though. It is a warm up. There are a whole bunch of hoops you have to jump through to actually be part of the survey. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"David Eduardo" wrote in message . com... "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... They can market them all they want. I don't know anyone personally that will buy one. I would not expect you would. Niether do I.. The consumer martketing just began this monthy. It's in a very early phase. They're just not willing to spend the sort of money to replace something that's been working just fine for them. What sort of money? You obviously don't know the price points of the next wave of receivers. And I doubt seriously that much of the general populus will want to replace the 5-10 analog radios they already have just for a joke of a digital signal. A signal which sounds better, doubles the FM station count, and gives AM decent quality. And it's "digital" which means a lot to the consumer. You keep talking about the contours.. well, those may look good on paper, they don't work in real life situations. That's amusing. We have two dozen of these on the air already, and in every case, the usable contour is greater for HD than for analog. The biggest benefit is to major market AMs where the ambient noise level means coverage is very limited. For FMs, we are finding a usable HD signal that goes beyond the 64 dbu, which is where almost all rated listening stops on analog. And rated listeners are all we care about, as that is how we make money. And that is the way it has been of 80 years or so. You'll learn that when people start tuning out of your stations en-masse. Funny, but nearly all our stations were up in Winter, including the HD enabled ones. Addin HD does not affect the ratings of the analog signal. It just expands th epotential for the future. I know that personally, I will never spend the money on IBOC receiving equipment. Since you don't even know how much it will cost in the next 18 months, that is a ludicrous statement. And how can you call it a ludicrous statement? It is a proper statement of FACT. I will never purchase an IBOC device. I will never listen to an IBOC signal. I am sick to death of having digital crammed down my throat when it is universally inferior to analog as far as listenability. I would much rather hear a bit of static on AM radio than the digital artifacts that exist in AM IBOC. I'm sick of digital satellite television with artifacts and pixelization and dropouts in even the most modest of rain storms which would have at most produced a bit of sparkling in the old analog satellite television. I have real world reports that the systems you push so hard do not work in areas where analog does. I won't spend a cent to replace something that has always worked with something of questionable value in general and no value whatsoever to me. Most people will feel that having twice the FM "stations" is well worht it. One time cost, tangible gain. Again, for most I do not believe it will be a gain. More of the same old crap for an additional investment of any kind is not going to sway people to buy IBOC radios. If it were so that they would do so, then the numbers for XM and Sirius would be a lot better than they are, and they wouldn't be trying to give away radios to get people to subscribe. You also presume that radio stations are going to spend the money on the additional programming sources to add to IBOC FM. I rather believe that most stations will opt to stay with their one basic programming source. IBOC interferes with adjacent channel stations. This is just poor engineering, and something that would never have been allowed in the days when the FCC was composed of engineers instead of greedy politicians. Since there is scan evidence that the adjacents are being listened to in the areas where the interference happens, this is irrelevant. Whether or not anyone, in your small version of the world, is listening or not, it's still **** poor engineering practice to splatter 2 or 3 channels away from your own. There's no way you can possibly make a silk purse out of that sow's ear. I was just talking to a friend of mine on the Oregon coast who has been listening regularly to KONA in the tri-cities on 610 for decades. He can no longer listen to it because KPOJ 620 in Portland turned on their IBOC and is splattering 15KHz either side of their carrier. You can do your best to talk up this boondoggle, but most of us see it for what it is.. just another way for the NAB to screw the little guy, including the listeners. Actually, this was not an NAB project. The promotion of it is not NAB. The engineering was not NAB. A bunch of group owners decided that radio had to move into the digital domain, and financed iBiquity's early stock offerings. Some of the early adopters are small, like UnoRadio Group, a Puerto Rican company that is owned by a lifetime engineer who believes this is the best hope of radio for the future. So few people listen to far-off signals and so many will leave radio altogether if we do not modernize delivery that this is a small price to pay to stay off obselecence. I think you'll find that rather than buy expensive new radios, They will not be expensive as they roll out. My first CD player was $1,400. My first DVD player was nearly $700. My first VHS was over $800. My first walkman CD player was nearly $300. Now there are $19 DVD players, $14 CD walkman players and nobody wants a VHS device. that listeners will just turn off their radios and go to other entertainment modes.. this is already largely the case with Ipods, portable CD and MD players, etc. Which have been studied and found to not compete with radio, but, in many cases, create more radio listening. Just as 45's and cassettes and CDs did. They are complimentary. Most young people don't even own a radio anymore, it's too easy for them to get the music they want, load it onto a personal portable device, and hear what they want, when they want, without incessant DJ patter and endless advertisements. Radio does not program to young people. It can not afford to. Yet, 93% of teens use radio weekly, so your data is just about totally wrong. You have some kind of emotional reaction to this that does not allow you to see the reality of pricing, radio usage or the "digital" phenomenon. In case you hadn't noticed in your myopic view, young people make money, they buy things. They also get older, and build into your narrow demographic. I know lots of young people, and I doubt that 10% of them own a radio. They own mp3 players. They read magazines, and buy CD's or download mp3's based on name recognition. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Eric F. Richards" wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: Since nobody answered the modem, you were NOT contacted. Your phone line was attempted, and discarded when it did not have a human on the other end. Actually I was contacted -- by mail. Got the dollar bill and everything. But when I told them it wasn't my primary phone number they lost interest. Original contact is made by pone, not mail. So you are lying or changing the order of things. Well, you better tell Arbitron that it has an imposter, then. They also sent the dollar bill and contact information to the water system's billing address. The water association got a big laugh over it. Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. "BE PART OF THE RADIO RATINGS! "Whether you listen a little, a lot, or not at all, you are important. Yours is one of the few households in your area chosen to tell radio stations what you listen to. "It's easy and fun to take part in our radio survey. In just a few days, an Arbitron reasearch assistant will call with more details. Or, here is how to get started right away: "o Call 1-800-638-7091 and ask to speak with an Arbitron research assistant, or "o Enroll on line at www.enroll.arbitronratings.com by using the following serial number (ed: deleted) "Thanks for your help, "/s/ Steve Morris "President, Arbitron Ratings "PS: Please accept the small token of appreciation we have enclosed with the letter." ...but clearly again you know better than this letter how they recruit. Jeez, your idiocy never ends, does it? That's how they contacted me... via letter. dxAce Michigan USA |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"dxAce" wrote in message ... He's been an idiot ever since I first came across his fake name in print. He generally gets his ass handed to him in most every 'dicussion' he enters into. News to me. How he ever made it in the field he's working in is just amazing. But then again, one must factor in who he's working for and who their target audience is. Translation: you are a racist. When Univision beats 2 of the 4 major TV networks in prime adult demos, it is hardly an audience group or a network that you can successfully belittle. And when the same company has 3 of the top 10 stations, including tow of the top 4, in Los Angeles, and is top 5 in markets like san Diego, Houston, Phoenix, Dallas, Chicago, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Miami, it is further hard to dismiss us. By the way, an industry person who gives a "grade" on ratings performance gave us the only A+ in the Winter Arbitrons, the only radio broadcaster to earn that grade. What have you done lately. Remember, he's 'HFBPO' (Hispanic For Business Purposes Only). I grew up Hispanic. Hispanic is a culture, not a race. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
That divorced Bell South woman next door (and that other woman too) I
better hurry up and finish reading the ink off of her home delivery www.clarionledger.com news paper.I expect they will be back over there in about six or eight or ten hours and that means I need to put her newspaper on those concrete steps by that side door of their house.They mostly don't read them newspapers anyway. cuhulin |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
On Sun, 21 May 2006 17:13:13 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: Again, for most I do not believe it will be a gain. More of the same old crap for an additional investment of any kind is not going to sway people to buy IBOC radios. If it were so that they would do so, then the numbers for XM and Sirius would be a lot better than they are, and they wouldn't be trying to give away radios to get people to subscribe. XM and Sirius are doing quite well signing people up. Faster than DBS was 5 years into their start-up. Over 10 million subscribers and adding over 10,000 a day. Nobody's giving away ''free'' receivers right now, AFAIK. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
On Sun, 21 May 2006 09:49:51 -0500, wrote:
It's just like I always Say.Anolog tube type Radios are the Best.digital Sucks! cuhulin I thought you have DirecTV. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"David" wrote in message ... On Sun, 21 May 2006 17:13:13 +0900, "Brenda Ann" wrote: Again, for most I do not believe it will be a gain. More of the same old crap for an additional investment of any kind is not going to sway people to buy IBOC radios. If it were so that they would do so, then the numbers for XM and Sirius would be a lot better than they are, and they wouldn't be trying to give away radios to get people to subscribe. XM and Sirius are doing quite well signing people up. Faster than DBS was 5 years into their start-up. Over 10 million subscribers and adding over 10,000 a day. Nobody's giving away ''free'' receivers right now, AFAIK. Some of the dealers are giving away receivers, since they get a commission on the service itself. But I do not think XM or Sirius are subsidizing any plans right now. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"David" wrote in message ... On Sun, 21 May 2006 09:49:51 -0500, wrote: It's just like I always Say.Anolog tube type Radios are the Best.digital Sucks! cuhulin I thought you have DirecTV. Connected to his tinfoil hat? |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "clifto" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: They can market them all they want. I don't know anyone personally that will buy one. I'd buy one for $10 if it had a usable line out I could feed my stereo gear. Much more than that, and it's just not worth it to hear talk radio or Spanish music. I did not know there was any station in the US that played much music from Spain. Of course, you meant "music in Spanish" I assume. ;-) Oh man I won't pass this opening up. This is just one reason to own a short wave radio. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"David Eduardo" wrote:
[...] Therefore, it is not recruitment, only a set up or staging to enhance the likelihood that the person will be able to be contacted for recruitment. Recruitment never implies acceptance. You can spin this however you want, but they solicited my input, by letter (in direct contradiction to your statements) and the phone number mismatch caused them to drop the solicitation -- even though every other fact matched, and it was, after all, my number. It's just not connected to a phone, that's all. Spin as hard as you want -- it just shows how far out of touch with the actual listening public you are. -- Eric F. Richards, "It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to create value. While it’s possible to make money in the short run without creating much value, in the long run it’s unsustainable. Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone." - Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006 |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
U.S.federal government is racist.
cuhulin |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
With a name like Eudardo,you ought to go hide your self in Shame!
cuhulin |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... He's been an idiot ever since I first came across his fake name in print. He generally gets his ass handed to him in most every 'dicussion' he enters into. News to me. How he ever made it in the field he's working in is just amazing. But then again, one must factor in who he's working for and who their target audience is. Translation: you are a racist. When Univision beats 2 of the 4 major TV networks in prime adult demos, it is hardly an audience group or a network that you can successfully belittle. And when the same company has 3 of the top 10 stations, including tow of the top 4, in Los Angeles, and is top 5 in markets like san Diego, Houston, Phoenix, Dallas, Chicago, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Miami, it is further hard to dismiss us. By the way, an industry person who gives a "grade" on ratings performance gave us the only A+ in the Winter Arbitrons, the only radio broadcaster to earn that grade. What have you done lately. Remember, he's 'HFBPO' (Hispanic For Business Purposes Only). I grew up Hispanic. Hispanic is a culture, not a race. Then how can I be a racist, 'tard boy? dxAce Michigan USA |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
David Frackelton Gleason aka Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... He's been an idiot ever since I first came across his fake name in print. He generally gets his ass handed to him in most every 'dicussion' he enters into. News to me. How he ever made it in the field he's working in is just amazing. But then again, one must factor in who he's working for and who their target audience is. Translation: you are a racist. When Univision beats 2 of the 4 major TV networks in prime adult demos, it is hardly an audience group or a network that you can successfully belittle. And when the same company has 3 of the top 10 stations, including tow of the top 4, in Los Angeles, and is top 5 in markets like san Diego, Houston, Phoenix, Dallas, Chicago, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Miami, it is further hard to dismiss us. By the way, an industry person who gives a "grade" on ratings performance gave us the only A+ in the Winter Arbitrons, the only radio broadcaster to earn that grade. What have you done lately. Remember, he's 'HFBPO' (Hispanic For Business Purposes Only). I grew up Hispanic. In your dreams. You grew up in the Cleveland area and according to my sources there, your family was certainly not Hispanic, far from it. You're a charlatan. dxAce Michigan USA |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: [...] Therefore, it is not recruitment, only a set up or staging to enhance the likelihood that the person will be able to be contacted for recruitment. Recruitment never implies acceptance. Sure it does. You are not recruited until both sides agree. Until then, you are a prospect. You can spin this however you want, but they solicited my input, by letter (in direct contradiction to your statements) and the phone number mismatch caused them to drop the solicitation -- even though every other fact matched, and it was, after all, my number. It's just not connected to a phone, that's all. You do not know that, since the phone caused you to NOT be recruited immediately. You might not have been in the desired quotas, for example, on age, sex, ethnicity or location. You do not know. Spin as hard as you want -- it just shows how far out of touch with the actual listening public you are. I am actually writing this from Columbia, MD, where I will be spending the week at Arbitron discussing, among other things, methodology issues with the designer of the diary sample frame. I do this many times a year. I have even done work for Arbitron in Mexico, training new subscribers on using the data and understanding it. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
wrote in message ... With a name like Eudardo,you ought to go hide your self in Shame! Eduardo is a given name, not a surname. It is the name given at the time of baptism, and the name of a saint. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... He's been an idiot ever since I first came across his fake name in print. He generally gets his ass handed to him in most every 'dicussion' he enters into. News to me. How he ever made it in the field he's working in is just amazing. But then again, one must factor in who he's working for and who their target audience is. Translation: you are a racist. When Univision beats 2 of the 4 major TV networks in prime adult demos, it is hardly an audience group or a network that you can successfully belittle. And when the same company has 3 of the top 10 stations, including tow of the top 4, in Los Angeles, and is top 5 in markets like san Diego, Houston, Phoenix, Dallas, Chicago, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Miami, it is further hard to dismiss us. By the way, an industry person who gives a "grade" on ratings performance gave us the only A+ in the Winter Arbitrons, the only radio broadcaster to earn that grade. What have you done lately. Remember, he's 'HFBPO' (Hispanic For Business Purposes Only). I grew up Hispanic. Hispanic is a culture, not a race. Then how can I be a racist, 'tard boy? Because, today, and the dictionaries I have agree, "race" is used as both a distinction of race (black, Asian, white, etc.) and group (the German Race) and has been for half a century. By that definition, discriminating against Hispanics is racist. The traditional usage would suggest "bigot" as the correct term, but that is far less used these days. So, I guess you are a racist bigot, if you want to get technical. Hell, man, you even hate Canadians. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason aka Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... He's been an idiot ever since I first came across his fake name in print. He generally gets his ass handed to him in most every 'dicussion' he enters into. News to me. How he ever made it in the field he's working in is just amazing. But then again, one must factor in who he's working for and who their target audience is. Translation: you are a racist. When Univision beats 2 of the 4 major TV networks in prime adult demos, it is hardly an audience group or a network that you can successfully belittle. And when the same company has 3 of the top 10 stations, including tow of the top 4, in Los Angeles, and is top 5 in markets like san Diego, Houston, Phoenix, Dallas, Chicago, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Miami, it is further hard to dismiss us. By the way, an industry person who gives a "grade" on ratings performance gave us the only A+ in the Winter Arbitrons, the only radio broadcaster to earn that grade. What have you done lately. Remember, he's 'HFBPO' (Hispanic For Business Purposes Only). I grew up Hispanic. In your dreams. You grew up in the Cleveland area and according to my sources there, your family was certainly not Hispanic, far from it. From age 14, I lived in Latin America almost all of the last 45 years. I did high school and college mostly there, and my kids don't even speak with me in English. what would you call that when referenced to "dominant culture?" By the way, you forgot the "Eduardo" after the "David." And the ancestors that gave the "Gleason" surname were from Galicia, where the Celts were "in residence" for quite a long time. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... He's been an idiot ever since I first came across his fake name in print. He generally gets his ass handed to him in most every 'dicussion' he enters into. News to me. How he ever made it in the field he's working in is just amazing. But then again, one must factor in who he's working for and who their target audience is. Translation: you are a racist. When Univision beats 2 of the 4 major TV networks in prime adult demos, it is hardly an audience group or a network that you can successfully belittle. And when the same company has 3 of the top 10 stations, including tow of the top 4, in Los Angeles, and is top 5 in markets like san Diego, Houston, Phoenix, Dallas, Chicago, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Miami, it is further hard to dismiss us. By the way, an industry person who gives a "grade" on ratings performance gave us the only A+ in the Winter Arbitrons, the only radio broadcaster to earn that grade. What have you done lately. Remember, he's 'HFBPO' (Hispanic For Business Purposes Only). I grew up Hispanic. Hispanic is a culture, not a race. Then how can I be a racist, 'tard boy? Because, today, and the dictionaries I have agree, "race" is used as both a distinction of race (black, Asian, white, etc.) and group (the German Race) and has been for half a century. By that definition, discriminating against Hispanics is racist. The traditional usage would suggest "bigot" as the correct term, but that is far less used these days. So, I guess you are a racist bigot, if you want to get technical. Hell, man, you even hate Canadians. LMFAO at the 'HFBPO', yet again. Go get your panties untangled, boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
David Frackelton Gleason aka Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason aka Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... He's been an idiot ever since I first came across his fake name in print. He generally gets his ass handed to him in most every 'dicussion' he enters into. News to me. How he ever made it in the field he's working in is just amazing. But then again, one must factor in who he's working for and who their target audience is. Translation: you are a racist. When Univision beats 2 of the 4 major TV networks in prime adult demos, it is hardly an audience group or a network that you can successfully belittle. And when the same company has 3 of the top 10 stations, including tow of the top 4, in Los Angeles, and is top 5 in markets like san Diego, Houston, Phoenix, Dallas, Chicago, Las Vegas, San Antonio, Miami, it is further hard to dismiss us. By the way, an industry person who gives a "grade" on ratings performance gave us the only A+ in the Winter Arbitrons, the only radio broadcaster to earn that grade. What have you done lately. Remember, he's 'HFBPO' (Hispanic For Business Purposes Only). I grew up Hispanic. In your dreams. You grew up in the Cleveland area and according to my sources there, your family was certainly not Hispanic, far from it. From age 14, I lived in Latin America almost all of the last 45 years. Records and sources in Cleveland and other locales dispute that! Keep trying. I did high school and college mostly there, and my kids don't even speak with me in English. what would you call that when referenced to "dominant culture?" By the way, you forgot the "Eduardo" after the "David." I didn't forget a thing. And the ancestors that gave the "Gleason" surname were from Galicia, where the Celts were "in residence" for quite a long time. LMFAO at the charlatan. dxAce Michigan USA |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"dxAce" wrote in message ... From age 14, I lived in Latin America almost all of the last 45 years. Records and sources in Cleveland and other locales dispute that! I interned in Mexico City at age 14, and the at age 17 built my first radio station in Ecuador while still at the Colegio Americano there. Nice try. I did high school and college mostly there, and my kids don't even speak with me in English. what would you call that when referenced to "dominant culture?" By the way, you forgot the "Eduardo" after the "David." I didn't forget a thing. Funny, it's on my DL and passport. And the ancestors that gave the "Gleason" surname were from Galicia, where the Celts were "in residence" for quite a long time. LMFAO at the charlatan. Now you are going to move into revisionist history? So the Celts were not in Galicia? Interesting. They still speak a version of Gaelic there. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"dxAce" wrote in message ... LMFAO at the 'HFBPO', yet again. Go get your panties untangled, boy. You are the Usenet equivalent of the schoolyard bully. Not enough ethnic minorities in your part of the woods to pick on, so you had to come here? |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... LMFAO at the 'HFBPO', yet again. Go get your panties untangled, boy. You are the Usenet equivalent of the schoolyard bully. you got that right Not enough ethnic minorities in your part of the woods to pick on, so you had to come here? but i think you mised here. I susect his problem is there are too many in his area both for his taste and more importantly for him to dare tlak like he types here. not flaming you but a bit of correction I think |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... From age 14, I lived in Latin America almost all of the last 45 years. Records and sources in Cleveland and other locales dispute that! I interned in Mexico City at age 14, and the at age 17 built my first radio station in Ecuador while still at the Colegio Americano there. Nice try. I did high school and college mostly there, and my kids don't even speak with me in English. what would you call that when referenced to "dominant culture?" By the way, you forgot the "Eduardo" after the "David." I didn't forget a thing. Funny, it's on my DL and passport. And the ancestors that gave the "Gleason" surname were from Galicia, where the Celts were "in residence" for quite a long time. LMFAO at the charlatan. Now you are going to move into revisionist history? No, I was simply LMFAO at the charlatan. dxAce Michigan USA |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
David Frackelton Gleason aka Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... LMFAO at the 'HFBPO', yet again. Go get your panties untangled, boy. You are the Usenet equivalent of the schoolyard bully. Not enough ethnic minorities in your part of the woods to pick on, so you had to come here? Well, you're certainly not an ethnic minority. You're a charlatan. Now go get those panties untangled. dxAce Michigan USA |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com