| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
May 15th 06, 06:24 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: Snip In many markets, 10 kw is not enough to cover the market without being trashed by manmade noise. Also, the relationship has to considder that low band AMs cover much better than high band... a 5 kw on 550 outcovers vastly a 50 kw on 1500. Snip You are referring to daytime reception only? Considering daytime ground wave propagation, is the difference in coverage low to high band due to ground conductivity where the high end of the band has more loss per mile? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| BROADCASTDB Live Radio : Just Added | Broadcasting | |||
| FS:SPEECH PROSCESSOR SP1-A BY CLEAR CHANNEL | Swap | |||
| Denver Clear Channel drops Fox Sports for Liberal Talk | Shortwave | |||
| Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
