| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Brenda Ann" wrote: "David" wrote in message ... On 18 May 2006 09:16:29 -0700, "RHF" wrote: SbSw, "I think it would be cool to have long wave (LW) broadcasters in the USA. Ten 2 megawatt stations, on 10 frequencies, evenly spaced across the country would cover the entire lower 48 day and night." i like that idea ~ RHF . That's absurd. A satellite covers the whole country and uses way less energy. Yes, and a satellite also requires a directional antenna and special receiver (and a subscription). Putting LW into standard radios would cost almost nothing, and add little to the cost of a portable radio. How much energy did it take to put the satellite into orbit? How much power is used in the uplink effort? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| BROADCASTDB Live Radio : Just Added | Broadcasting | |||
| FS:SPEECH PROSCESSOR SP1-A BY CLEAR CHANNEL | Swap | |||
| Denver Clear Channel drops Fox Sports for Liberal Talk | Shortwave | |||
| Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||