"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
DE - "IF" What you say is true... That Aztlán
was in Northern {Present Day} Mexico. Then
What Claim do any Mexicanos now have on
any Lands currently in the USA ? ~ RHF

Most have none. The "Aztlan" movement, limited to a few thousand, wants to
build a Chicano nation divorced form both Mexico and the US. Chicanos,
though, are not Mexican.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



I actually work in radio, and with multiple successful stations. From
your
posts, you don't really understand how the business of radio works.

From your posts, you really don't understand that IBOC = QRM.

HD uses spectrum that is not, in today's environment, generating
significant
listening (fringe signal listening in other words) and uses it to enhance
radio stations so they may better compete in a world with alternate
delivery
paths and an obsession with digital sources. It is, in effect, a
no-brainier
trade of a few cents for many potential dollars.

It's also a no brainer that IBOC = QRM.

Something is only interference if it interferes which listening to something
else. Since there is only a minuscule amount of interest in listening to
distant signals outside their primary coverage areas, for most people there
is no interference at all.

"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message
oups.com...
And I keep telling you, Brenda, that the radios will eventually improve
and come down in price.

I showed you that new Radiosophy model. Much improved over the
BA-Recepter HD radio.

Things will get cooking once they figure out how to squeeze all the
necessary electronics into a radio the size of a cigarette pack.

And figure out how to make the HD chip run for more than an hour on a set of
batteries. That is the current problem with HD portables and why there are
none! the next generation chips are in design, though.

If I had a name like Euardo,,, I wouldn't waste any time in changing my
name.
cuhulin

And P.... Fink Eduardo antes up.
cuhulin

dxAce,Brenda is my kid.
cuhulin

David Eduardo wrote:

And figure out how to make the HD chip run for more than an hour on a set of
batteries. That is the current problem with HD portables and why there are
none! the next generation chips are in design, though.

I'm going to wait until a true pocket-portable unit comes out....maybe
at an attractive price of say US$100.00 max? Hopefully one that uses
standard AA batts and not some proprietary rechargeable thing like
cell-phones.

And a nice small table-top unit about the size of the Recepter HD, but
at a $100 price - along the lines of the Kloss Tivoli #1.

By then we'll see if this IBOC system will be the future of terrestial
radio.

And THEN I will pounce. And I'm sure many others will, too.

Eventually, consumers won't have a choice. Every new radio will be an
IBOC receiver.

--
Stephanie

David Eduardo wrote:

"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message
oups.com...
And I keep telling you, Brenda, that the radios will eventually improve
and come down in price.

I showed you that new Radiosophy model. Much improved over the
BA-Recepter HD radio.

Things will get cooking once they figure out how to squeeze all the
necessary electronics into a radio the size of a cigarette pack.

And figure out how to make the HD chip run for more than an hour on a set of
batteries. That is the current problem with HD portables and why there are
none! the next generation chips are in design, though.

They should have designed out the QRM.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

wrote:

dxAce,Brenda is my kid.

Well if she wasn't aware of that already, she'll soon find out!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Good Gawd amighty,,,,, she told me somthing I didn't need to know.Dam.n
crazy A.. wimmins.
cuhulin