"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
Doh ! - David - So Tell Me . . .
What Right Do Mexican Licensed Radio Stations like XEPRS
and XETRA have to Broadcast 'into' the USA and reach the
Greater Los Angeles California Radio Market ? ? ?

International allocations allow use of certain frequencies for regional
broadcasting.

KGBT, a 50 kw in Harlingen, TX, pushes all its power at Mexico. What right
do they have to do that? The right is based on treaties that give 1530
principally to the US to ues.

There are far more US stations pumpling power at Mexico than Mexican
staitons pumping power at the US.

-IF- An American Licensed Radio Station is 'interferring with a
Mexican Radio Station inside of the Nation of Mexico - Then
they {The Mexicans} have a Valid Complaint [.]
-if- However they can not be heard in LA - No Problemo !
Note- That "LA" is about 213 km ~ 132 Miles from "TJ".

There is a joint committee called the Mixta set up to resolve allocations
and frequency usage.

DE - So you are saying that US AM Radio Stations are in-fact
"Licensed" to Broadcast 'to' Mexico ! - i don't think so ~ RHF

"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
DE - Wake-Up ! There Are NO Clear Channels ! - any more . . .
-and- IBOC will put an End to All the Regional AM'ers Too ~ RHF

The clears still exist, but the former 1-A's are protected to only 750
miles, and the B's are protected even less. But they exist. However, most of
them do not pay any attention to out of market listening, as there is no
longer any revenue from it.

On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:34:32 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"RHF" wrote in message
roups.com...
DE - Wake-Up ! There Are NO Clear Channels ! - any more . . .
-and- IBOC will put an End to All the Regional AM'ers Too ~ RHF

The clears still exist, but the former 1-A's are protected to only 750
miles, and the B's are protected even less. But they exist. However, most of
them do not pay any attention to out of market listening, as there is no
longer any revenue from it.


Dwardo doesn't believe in good will. His karma is broken.

On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:28:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

The reality is that revenue is based
on the ratings and efforts in the local, groundwave market today and that
distant listening is not significant.


....public interest, convenience and necessity.

"David" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:28:40 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

The reality is that revenue is based
on the ratings and efforts in the local, groundwave market today and that
distant listening is not significant.


...public interest, convenience and necessity.

Stations are licensed to serve the local community, starting witht he city
of license. In the past, like the 60's and 70's, a licensee had to do
ascertainment of community needs every 3 years for license renewal. That
meant talking to community leaders... stations generally talked to such
leaders in a small area around the city of license and the surrounding towns
and communities.

The FCC has always emphasized local service... the reason the clears were
not granted 500 to 750 kw as they lobbied for from the 40's through about
1968 was that the FCC wanted to encourage more local stations, not regional
or national ones.