Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HD article from Radio World
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message . com... Commentary: IBOC Naysayers Fear Change Educator Says It's Time for Radio to Leave the Warm Glow of the 12AV6 by Edward Montgomery [long-winded, poorly-focused article snipped] IBOC opponents aren't technical illiterates I have never thought they were. Most are, however, satisfied with the present analog technologies and have a different opinion on the reasons for change. The most common issue is to see the opponents focus on content, without considering the disadvantages of a heritage delivery system. Snip 1. Money invested in receiving equipment. 2. Going to a more complex transmission scheme. 3. Control over who can listen. 4. Using a proprietary scheme over one in the public domain. 5. Only somewhat compatible with existing spectrum usage. 6. The change is advantageous for the broadcasters in reducing costs and possibly creating additional revenue where the listener just gets additional costs. A deal for the listener...not. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|