| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
David Eduardo wrote: "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message news ![]() "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message . com... Commentary: IBOC Naysayers Fear Change Educator Says It's Time for Radio to Leave the Warm Glow of the 12AV6 by Edward Montgomery [long-winded, poorly-focused article snipped] IBOC opponents aren't technical illiterates I have never thought they were. Most are, however, satisfied with the present analog technologies and have a different opinion on the reasons for change. The most common issue is to see the opponents focus on content, without considering the disadvantages of a heritage delivery system. And the IBOC proponents totally dismiss the primary advantage of the heritage delivery system, that is long distance propagation. - When the FCC dismissed the final attempts to get the 1 A clears - upgraded to 500 to 750 kw each in the late 60's, they began an - effort towards extreme localism that resulted, in the next decade, - in the allocation and licencing of at least on 1 B on every clear - channel in the US. At the seme time, lesser classes were allowed - on the clears, including daytimers and lower powered fulltimers. DE, 435 Congress Persons 'each' with a Local AM Radio Station in their Home District that is Adding to and Building the Local Economy are Clearly More Important then 25-50 'select' Congress Persons with one Clear Channel AM Radio Station monopolizing the marketing for an entire region. ~ RHF |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|