Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Jerk I have built, managed and programmed AMs for the last 42 years. The decline is technology based, and can be corrected... with technology. Nothing wrong with the technology, 'tard boy. AM (MW) comes in just fine here. And it comes in even better without the HD/IBOC QRM. There is everything wrong with the technology. It sounds so inferior that nobody who "grew up" on FM will touch it, as it is irritating. Two generations now have no use for AM. The only users, like you, are old farts who do not look at the future or have lost most of their hearing. I don't know where you are coming from on this. I grew up listening to FM and AM and I think AMBCB sounds just fine. The fact that you are on this group means you are not an average listener. I have posted data from a variety of US markets, as well as national averages. Again: in 12-34 year old listeners, in LA, the total share for AM is less than the indvidual station shares for the 6 highest rated FMs. 6%. Nearly nobody. AM may sound good to you, but to nearly everyone under 45, it is presently irrelevant and sucks. AMBCB has good fidelity and so does FM. AMBCB is not stereo but I don't care as I listen to talk radio and news on that band. I don't spend much time with FM. Generally I listen to AMBCB, short wave, and spend time on the Internet for news. The problem is just that. Only talk shows and such get on AM, because anything else that requires fidelty will not work. Talk appeals to a very old audience, and in many cases, it is getting harder and harder to sell. This is what is bothering me about the move to HD. The move is supposed to be an improvement but it does not seem that way to me. The move to HD is just going to cost me money, not make an improvement, and change my listening in ways I don't want. It's a lousy deal for me to spend money I don't need to spend to keep getting what I already have. Same problem for DRM on short wave. DRM is an effort to make SW relevant, just as HD is for MW, to newer generations that are looking for digital quality (in developed nations) and at least FM quality in others. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
ABC's NASA story | Shortwave | |||
Fake news from Washington | Shortwave | |||
Spectrum plot of an IBOC AM station | Shortwave | |||
The AM IBOC mess is yet to begin... | Broadcasting |