Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message oups.com... "Most of what is being debated is to let newspapers own electronic media. This may have tow benefits: it can save many newspapers that are failing and it can provide better news coverage to the radio and TV stations they might own." I thought newspapers could always own electronic mediums. There are some grandfathered ones, but it is currently prohibited for new purchases. "This may have two benefits: it can save many newspapers that are failing and it can provide better news coverage to the radio and TV stations they might own." I hadn't considered this situation from this particular viewpoint - and it may very well be that the FCC is trying to save more local media than I had originally considered. The FCC policy since the later 40's has been based on localism, so this fits the stated policy. Irrelevant. You are BUSTED. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Drive Out the Bush Regime! Mobilize for November 2, 2005! | Shortwave | |||
VOA Outsources Newcasts to Communist China, Jamming Continues | Shortwave | |||
Communist China’s Ownership of Western media | Shortwave | |||
Will the US CBS Network loose its broadcasting license over the Dan Rather row? | Broadcasting | |||
More media bias | Shortwave |