Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... I don't anything wrong with what you wrote but you seem to think that the diode used makes no difference because you can make it up its deficiencies with an amplifier whose input impedance and gain adjusts for it. I don't think we disagree on anything important, but I wanted to say that, after a point, it won't make any practical difference to the distortion of the detector if a diode has a linear region or a very non linear square law region. The resistance of the load soon dominates the characteristiscs of the circuit. The rest of my reply was mostly aimed at the original article's contention that a diodes distortion level can be derived from only from a diode's presumed square law characteristics and the modulation index. Basically that is true that you can use a less efficient diode but you will have to provide higher signal levels to it and weak signals will still be distorted due to compression. I suppose you could use a logarithmic type amplifier following the detector in order to make up for the compression. I suppose, but I don't see any need. The distortion of the diode detector can be quite low if it's driven at a proper level to minimize the the amount of the waveform in the non linear region of the detector. If you look at the diode curves germanium has one of the better forward current to input voltage ratios of several diode types. Right. A germanium diode would generally give less distortion and better sensitivity than a silicon diode. More than that, there used to be a bunch of specialized germanium diodes intended for radio audio detection, video detection and such. It seems now it's 1N34A types. Not being a radio designer my approach would be to use a diodes fairly liner region with a better forward current to input voltage ratio where the least distortion and compression would be due to it and therefor the least needed correction to be made up for by a amplifier with a fixed correction. Another reason to use a more efficient diode besides the signal level power needed is the power the diode itself burns when you bias the diodes with larger forward voltage junctions. Efficiency is a bigger consideration with crystal sets. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interesting Article | Shortwave | |||
low distortion antenna amp | Homebrew | |||
Antenna vs Ground - interesting article FWIW | Antenna | |||
Reflection Delay is it real??? | Antenna | |||
LQQKing for Construction Article | Antenna |