Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:06:31 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
m:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:17:07 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:



But you are lazy Mark in the Dark, you refuse to do what it takes to
upgrade.
no I simply can't do it, certainly in the legal sens eof it
You're waiting for the FCC hand-out licenses.

not at all that you can't understand


I understand enough to know that thousands have passed the code elements,
but now that it looks like ham radio is going to get dumbed down more you
refuse to be a good ham and learn it.

SC

Stick code up your lame old ass. No one cares about code, let alone
hams, shortwave, etc. Get a ****ing life. No one here wants to hear
about your dead code bull****.
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:51:01 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:06:31 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:17:07 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:



But you are lazy Mark in the Dark, you refuse to do what it takes to
upgrade.
no I simply can't do it, certainly in the legal sens eof it
You're waiting for the FCC hand-out licenses.

not at all that you can't understand


I understand enough to know that thousands have passed the code elements,
so? Hilter killed miliions of jew did that make it right?
but now that it looks like ham radio is going to get dumbed down more you
refuse to be a good ham and learn it.
if you are a good ham I'll be a bad one

SC
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Douche Bag" wrote in message
oups.com...
Stick code up your lame old ass. No one cares about code, let alone
hams, shortwave, etc. Get a ****ing life. No one here wants to hear
about your dead code bull****.
wrote:

Douche, Actually a lot of people do care about CW. There is frequently a
lot of CW activity on the various bands. CW has been my primary operating
mode for the past few years. I have not been at it for 100 years and I am a
hardcore computer geek. CW is just a pleasant change of pace for me.
However, I must agree with you that some of the putzes on this group do need
to get a life -- there actually is more to life (and ham radio) than CW. If
it were not for my growing killfile, the QRM here would be deafening.

Anyone who uses such poor language as that used below is exactly what that
signature implies ... lacking in civility.

Douche Bag wrote:

Stick code up your lame old ass. No one cares about code, let alone
hams, shortwave, etc. Get a ****ing life. No one here wants to hear
about your dead code bull****.
wrote:

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

if you are a good ham I'll be a bad one


No, Markie in the Darkie, I'm a ham and you aren't.

SC