"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

wrote:

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

I really feel that those Spanish only stations in the USofA should be required
to air at least 60% English so as to help *assimilate* the invaders.

Yeah,,, Chase them ALL to H..L OUT of AMERICA! I am AMERICAN,Born and
Raised,Carthage,Mississippi,UNITED STATES oF AMERICA.I Speak the
AMERICAN English Language.In my COUNTRY,Speak ONLY AMERICAN,my Language.
www.thecarthaginian.com
cuhulin

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:57:11 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

I really feel that those Spanish only stations in the USofA should be required
to air at least 60% English so as to help *assimilate* the invaders.

FYI, rhe primary PBS station in the New York City area today started a
Spanish secondary digital channel, displacing an English digital
channel from some cable systems.

http://www.thirteen.org/homepage/pro...ouncement.html

Of course, illegals working minimum wage or less probably are not
watching a digital TV channel of any variety.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Tester" wrote in message
g...
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:57:11 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

I really feel that those Spanish only stations in the USofA should be
required
to air at least 60% English so as to help *assimilate* the invaders.

FYI, rhe primary PBS station in the New York City area today started a
Spanish secondary digital channel, displacing an English digital
channel from some cable systems.

http://www.thirteen.org/homepage/pro...ouncement.html

Of course, illegals working minimum wage or less probably are not
watching a digital TV channel of any variety.

In New York, over half the Hispanic adult population consists of Puerto
Ricans, and there are no illegal Puerto Ricans.

David Eduardo wrote:

"Tester" wrote in message
g...
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:57:11 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

I really feel that those Spanish only stations in the USofA should be
required
to air at least 60% English so as to help *assimilate* the invaders.

FYI, rhe primary PBS station in the New York City area today started a
Spanish secondary digital channel, displacing an English digital
channel from some cable systems.

http://www.thirteen.org/homepage/pro...ouncement.html

Of course, illegals working minimum wage or less probably are not
watching a digital TV channel of any variety.

In New York, over half the Hispanic adult population consists of Puerto
Ricans, and there are no illegal Puerto Ricans.

So then is the other half illegal?

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"Tester" wrote in message
g...
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:57:11 -0500, dxAce
wrote:



wrote:

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

I really feel that those Spanish only stations in the USofA should be
required
to air at least 60% English so as to help *assimilate* the invaders.

FYI, rhe primary PBS station in the New York City area today started a
Spanish secondary digital channel, displacing an English digital
channel from some cable systems.

http://www.thirteen.org/homepage/pro...ouncement.html

Of course, illegals working minimum wage or less probably are not
watching a digital TV channel of any variety.

In New York, over half the Hispanic adult population consists of Puerto
Ricans, and there are no illegal Puerto Ricans.

So then is the other half illegal?

No, I was just pointing out that fully half of the Hispanic population could
not be illegal because it is Puerto Rican. The previous poster seemed to be
trying to suggest that _all_ Hispanics are illegal, which, of course is not
true and which, in NY, is even less true.

On Mar 6, 2:26 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Tester" wrote in message

g...





On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 10:57:11 -0500, dxAce
wrote:

wrote:

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

http://www.hear2.com/2007/03/should_....html#comments

Beats me - ask the fake Hispanic Eduardo.

I really feel that those Spanish only stations in the USofA should be
required
to air at least 60% English so as to help *assimilate* the invaders.

FYI, rhe primary PBS station in the New York City area today started a
Spanish secondary digital channel, displacing an English digital
channel from some cable systems.

http://www.thirteen.org/homepage/pro...ouncement.html

Of course, illegals working minimum wage or less probably are not
watching a digital TV channel of any variety.

In New York, over half the Hispanic adult population consists of Puerto
Ricans, and there are no illegal Puerto Ricans.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

DE,

Now come on lets be realistic there are plenty
of Puerto Ricans involved in Illegal Activities.

FYI - If they were born in Puerto Rico then they are
Puerto Rican. However -if- they were Born in New
York City, NY, USofA then they are Americans [.]

birth-and-birth-rights - they are both natural things ~ RHF

wrote in message
ps.com...
"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"


They already do in HD radio. Leaving your sorry ass behind in analog.

On Mar 3, 3:32�pm, "HD Radio Fan" wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...

"Should Country stations specifically chase Hispanics?"

They already do in HD radio. *Leaving your sorry ass behind in analog.

"In-Stat: Digital Radio Set to Take Off"

"In 2006, 73 percent of respondents to an In-Stat U.S. consumer survey
were aware of HD Radio on some level."

http://beradio.com/eyeoniboc/instat-digital-radio-set/

"Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check" (Alexaholic)

"While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD
shows no signs of a pulse."

http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_....html#comments

This just confirms, the lack of interest for HD Radio, on Google
Trends:

http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd... =all&date=all

"Rethinking AM's Future"

"Only 175 or so AM stations have even licensed AM-HD. For a number of
reasons, quite a few have tried it and taken it off the air, or so the
anecdotal evidence suggests. Ibiquity no longer reports in its public
summaries whether a station is on the air. Making AM-HD work well as a
long-term investment is seen as an expensive and risky challenge for
most stations and their owners. With the bulk of successful AMs airing
news, talk and sports, the improved fidelity advantage of HD and
stereo seem only marginally attractive. There is the significant
downside of potential new interference to some of their own AM analog
listeners as well as listeners of adjacent-channel stations. And of
course we still have no nighttime authority for AM-HD."

http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.557.html

Existing RDS has the same texting functions, as HD/IBOC. For now, HD
Radio/IBOC is dead.