Steve wrote:

On Mar 15, 1:15 pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:

I think you must have meant to post this he

HD RADIO =http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio/

I am the only one, who has posted there - 3 whole users.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I think this will be an interesting test case, actually. There've been
times when I've wondered whether the people who post about HD radio
here are genuinely interested in it or are simply trolling
rec.radio.shortwave. Now there's an HD radio group, and it's being
publicized right here in rec.radio.shortwave. So, let's see how many
people sign up for the new group and actually post there. This will be
very interesting indeed.

Good point. I've decided not to read or reply to any of the posters'
here that continue to participate in the HD thread abuse, even if they
have signed up for the new HD group.

On Mar 22, 12:28?pm, HFguy wrote:
Steve wrote:

On Mar 15, 1:15 pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:

I think you must have meant to post this he

HD RADIO =http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio/

I am the only one, who has posted there - 3 whole users.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think this will be an interesting test case, actually. There've been
times when I've wondered whether the people who post about HD radio
here are genuinely interested in it or are simply trolling
rec.radio.shortwave. Now there's an HD radio group, and it's being
publicized right here in rec.radio.shortwave. So, let's see how many
people sign up for the new group and actually post there. This will be
very interesting indeed.

Good point. I've decided not to read or reply to any of the posters'
here that continue to participate in the HD thread abuse, even if they
have signed up for the new HD group.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good for you, HFguy !