Maybe I should have voted for the SOB!!!!

from CNN
-- Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s climate change panel
win
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Details soon.

Burr wrote:

Maybe I should have voted for the SOB!!!!

from CNN
-- Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s climate change panel
win
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Details soon.

And as I heard yesterday, the Nobel Committee seems to have abandoned their own
criteria as regards what the Prize is actually to be awarded for!

Gore is mentally ill, much like Edweenie!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Burr wrote:

Maybe I should have voted for the SOB!!!!

from CNN
-- Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s climate change panel
win
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Details soon.

And as I heard yesterday, the Nobel Committee seems to have abandoned
their own
criteria as regards what the Prize is actually to be awarded for!

Gore is mentally ill, much like Edweenie!

No ****. The NPP is a farce as its awarded to any snake oil salesman that
comes along.

The NPP has gone to heck lately.Neither Carter or Gore deserve to win
any Peace prizes.
cuhulin

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Burr wrote:

Maybe I should have voted for the SOB!!!!

from CNN
-- Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s climate change panel
win
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Details soon.

And as I heard yesterday, the Nobel Committee seems to have abandoned their
own
criteria as regards what the Prize is actually to be awarded for!

Gore is mentally ill, much like Edweenie!

Al Gore is as big a nut case as Alex Jones.

The Nobel prizes go to the biggest liberals of the year like big Al.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Oct 12, 2:16 am, "Burr" wrote:
Maybe I should have voted for the SOB!!!!

from CNN
-- Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s climate change panel
win
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Details soon.

"Jimmy Carter" also won a Nobel Peace Prize
=so= Al Gore is in 'Perfect' Company. ~ RHF

On Oct 12, 2:16 am, "Burr" wrote:
Maybe I should have voted for the SOB!!!!

from CNN
-- Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s climate change panel
win
the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Details soon.

While it's certainly open to debate whether global warming falls under
the purview of a peace prize, there's no question that once it's
decided that the prize goes for that, Albert Gore Jr. is deserving of
it.

The idea that global warming is liberal bias is preposterous. Global
warming is occurring, and the majority of that warming is
anthropogenic, and this is the consensus of climate scientists. None
of this is controversial in scientific circles, or at least no more
controversial than most generally-accepted theories.

Recent data suggests that warming is increasing faster than predicted
because the melting of ice is releasing additional C02 and methane
trapped under the ice from biomass frozen under the ice.

This could easily be the most serious threat that humankind has ever
faced.

So for Gore's tireless crusade to call attention to this issue, and
for his taking the initiative for creating the Internet by sponsoring
the bill that funded DARPAnet, the experimental government research
program which created the Internet, he certainly seems to be a
visionary and a strong contributor to making the world a better place.

This Gore-hatred is sick. He's a great man, and this country should
be proud of his winning this prize, not being a bunch of narrow-minded
ill-informed yahoos seeing things as liberal vs. conservative when its
really well-supported facts vs. junk Exxon science and fringe solar
theories that are not accepted.

Ross Archer wrote:

snip

Global warming is occurring,

snip

This could easily be the most serious threat that humankind has ever
faced.


Surely you must admit that it depends on who you are and where you live
if this is threat or opportunity. Climate change has been at the
center of evolution and the tectonic plates continue to move. Where
are the discussions regarding _preparing_ for the changes as opposed
to _preventing_ them?

Regards,

Michael

On Oct 12, 11:25 pm, msg wrote:
Ross Archer wrote:

snip

Global warming is occurring,

snip

This could easily be the most serious threat that humankind has ever
faced.

Surely you must admit that it depends on who you are and where you live
if this is threat or opportunity. Climate change has been at the
center of evolution and the tectonic plates continue to move. Where
are the discussions regarding _preparing_ for the changes as opposed
to _preventing_ them?

Regards,

Michael

MSG,

We would not be here Today - except for Climate Change -and-
We may not be here in the Future because of Climate Change.

'climate change' - hey i invented that ! ~ RHF

On Oct 13, 1:25 am, msg wrote:
Ross Archer wrote:

snip

Global warming is occurring,

snip

This could easily be the most serious threat that humankind has ever
faced.

Surely you must admit that it depends on who you are and where you live
if this is threat or opportunity. Climate change has been at the
center of evolution and the tectonic plates continue to move. Where
are the discussions regarding _preparing_ for the changes as opposed
to _preventing_ them?

Regards,

Michael

What a novel concept. Preparing for changes that have been happening
since the beginning with time - and, pardon the pun - "going with the
flow" so to speak - or trying to stop them. Maybe you should produce
a movie on that topic. But I doubt the powers that be will want to
award that thinking any kind of mention - since it would do a lot to
quash all the hub bud over the environment.

Still in all, I think we are responsible for our environment - as it
were - we are the keepers, and we should try to pass the world on to
those after us in some sort of decent shape - but I'm not sure humans
can solve all the evoluntionary issues. After all, there are all
sorts of things causing the breakdown to the environment including the
fact that the earth is aging just like the rest of us.