On Oct 18, 10:42*am, BarackHuessinObama mmm mmm mmm
wrote:
Damn facts are always getting in the way of the liberals march to
socialism...

$2.3 million in federal stimulus money is going to pay for Tampa Bay
area beauty school tuition

More than $2.3 million in federal economic stimulus grants have gone
to eight Tampa Bay area cosmetology and massage schools to pay tuition
for the hairdressers, masseuses and nail technicians of tomorrow.

That's swell news for those who see the beauty trades as a way to gain
a firmer footing in the job market. But is there truly demand for more
beauty school graduates at bay area salons?

Not really, said Monica Ponce, owner of Muse The Salon in Tampa.

"Instead of encouraging more people to go to beauty schools," Ponce
said, "they should probably help the stylists who are unemployed."

Some area salons are hiring in this economy, but even industry
lobbyists say beauty school is rarely a ticket to a thriving career.

Only 1 to 2 percent of beauty school graduates will be working in the
field five years from graduation, said Bonnie Poole, treasurer of the
Florida Cosmetology Association.

"Yes, it's a good trade," Poole said. "But it's only for a select few
who want to wade through the mud to get to where they want to be."

The stimulus money is being paid to beauty schools in the form of Pell
Grants, which are awarded to low-income students. The grants don't
have to be repaid.

The government doesn't allocate the money based on an assessment of
what kinds of job skills are in demand. Rather, students apply to the
government for the grants and if eligible can put the money toward the
vocational school, college or university to which they've been
accepted.

The government sends the grant money directly to schools.

The stimulus bill includes $17 billion to boost the Pell Grant program
and raise the maximum annual award from $4,731 to $5,350.

Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, voiced
surprise when told beauty schools were getting a stimulus bump.

"It would raise the eyebrows of many Americans to know that is where
their Pell Grant and stimulus money is going," Ellis said.

But the federal Education Department is supportive.

"We are committed to increasing access and affordability for higher
education," agency spokeswoman Jane Glickman said in a statement, "and
the stimulus funds are making additional money for Pell Grants
available for students attending all types of postsecondary
institutions."

According to a review of available data, 17 percent of the roughly $14
million in Pell Grants being paid to vocational schools in the bay
area is going to those teaching cosmetology and massage. The
percentage is tough to target precisely because some schools offer
both academic and vocational study.

Other schools getting money offer vocational training in the health
care, aviation, computer, fashion and design fields.

The grant awards include more than $1 million to Manhattan Beauty
School in Tampa, $250,000 to Bene's International School of Beauty in
New Port Richey and $280,000 to Sun State College of Hair Design in
Clearwater.

Manhattan has nearly 600 students, Bene's about 250 and Sun State 230,
according to interviews and federal data.

The data suggest those three schools rely heavily on Pell Grants.
Information collected for 2007 and 2008 indicate that 81 percent of
students at the schools used the grants.

Patrick Bene, president of Bene's International School of Beauty, said
he has seen his enrollment increase roughly 40 percent in the
recession, due in part to the increased availability of Pell Grants.

The grants, he said, are invaluable to a class of students who too
often come from disadvantaged backgrounds and lack traditional
academic skills.

"These are kids who are not going to be going to college," Bene said.
"It's not part of their life plan, but they need a career."

For a course of study in cosmetology that can last almost a year,
Bene's school charges $12,000, considerably more than an in-state
student spends for a year at the University of Florida, the state's
flagship. Most students rely on government and private loans in
addition to Pell Grants.

It's true that hiring is down at salons, Bene said, but those that are
closing had not established themselves. The successful salons, he
said, are still doing a strong business.

"I'm not having graduates come back in and say 'Hey, Mr. Bene, I can't
find a job,' " he said.

From July 1, 2007, to June 30, 2008, Bene's International School of
Beauty reported to regulators that 78 percent of graduates had been
placed in jobs.

Others report a tight job market.

Dennis McMahan, owner of McMahan & Company, a St. Petersburg salon,
said he recently tried to a hire a woman but could not because he can
only offer commission.

"She needed an hourly wage," McMahan said. "I used to be able to do
that, but not in this economy, our business is down."

McMahan's own daughter now goes to beauty school in St. Petersburg. He
said he's comfortable with her choice because it has made her happy,
and he'll give her a job in his salon.

Would he be worried about his daughter's future if he were not in a
position to hand her work?

"Yeah," McMahan said. "Big time."

Chad Malm, owner of Salon Jack in Tampa, said he gets as many as six
applicants every week. There are plenty of hairdressers, he said, and
using stimulus money to put students through beauty school is
ridiculous.

"It's not for everybody to be jumping in and wasting tax dollars," he
said. "What, are you kidding me?"

This highlights a serious disconnect between what employers need
and what schools, who may employ teachers who are not producing
educations that actually stimulate the economy, other than save their
own pathetic jobs?

Blame the price of lumber? No one wants to manage forests better?
It used to be that young people could build furniture, and not work in
a
smelly plastic factory (saw dust is not fun either, without minimizing
it)
instead of living in an an empty apartment with no furniture?

There are no easy answers, but thanks to thinking like this,
we can at least stop saving the pathetic jobs? But because employers
don't teach anything anymore, but demand to be given highly trained
employees from day one, can we stop pointing fingers at the federal
government alone? Isn't that why the military is so successful, they
train
their own people, instead of depending on others to guess what they
need?

How about this, more of you that are doing the hiring, you do the
training, instead of some
clueless union teacher who has not worked a day in the private sector
in years?
Is this the kind of thinking you want to happen when your economy is
being
shredded, and teachers are cranking out students in record numbers?

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which have free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!