Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All,
I'm looking for an AM/CW rig in the 100 watt class, and may have a choice between a Heath DX-100 and a Heath Apache. In looking at the specs I could find on the two, the Apache looks like the better choice. What do you think? Cheers, Brian Ex: W5BRO, K6UCD |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Burns wrote:
I'm looking for an AM/CW rig in the 100 watt class, and may have a choice between a Heath DX-100 and a Heath Apache. In looking at the specs I could find on the two, the Apache looks like the better choice. What do you think? Well, the Apache will send SSB, which is a good feature to have, whereas the DX-100 won't. On the other hand, the DX-100 is much simpler, as a result. But I would pick whichever of the two is factory-wired. If they were both built as kits, I'd pick the one that has the best-looking solder joints. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Brian Burns wrote: I'm looking for an AM/CW rig in the 100 watt class, and may have a choice between a Heath DX-100 and a Heath Apache. In looking at the specs I could find on the two, the Apache looks like the better choice. What do you think? Well, the Apache will send SSB, which is a good feature to have, whereas the DX-100 won't. On the other hand, the DX-100 is much simpler, as a result. But I would pick whichever of the two is factory-wired. If they were both built as kits, I'd pick the one that has the best-looking solder joints. --scott Good advice but if the rig is primarily for AM I would check the manuals to see how its generated. The DX-100 is plate modulated but most SSB rigs do AM by either injecting carrier on one sideband or with controlled carrier or some other scheme that will work with a linear amplifier. -- -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles WB6KBL |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Richard Knoppow wrote:
"Richard Knoppow" wrote in message m... "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Brian Burns wrote: Disregard my post. The Apache does have plate modulation, I was confusing it with another transmitter. But it was a valid point to check. Most SSB transmitters used low level modulation for AM, so the Apache then becomes a relatively uncommon item, an SSB rig that does plate modulation for AM. That tends to make it a better choice, since it does SSB too. Michael VE2BVW |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Richard Knoppow wrote: "Richard Knoppow" wrote in message m... "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Brian Burns wrote: Disregard my post. The Apache does have plate modulation, I was confusing it with another transmitter. But it was a valid point to check. Most SSB transmitters used low level modulation for AM, so the Apache then becomes a relatively uncommon item, an SSB rig that does plate modulation for AM. That tends to make it a better choice, since it does SSB too. Let me guess: this approach gives you higher output power on AM since the final can be operated class C, but it doubles the weight of the transmitter with that huge modulation transformer? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Apache by itself does not have SSB capability. For that, you also
need the SB-10 Sideband Adapter. I had both but sold them years ago. John Scott Dorsey wrote: Brian Burns wrote: I'm looking for an AM/CW rig in the 100 watt class, and may have a choice between a Heath DX-100 and a Heath Apache. In looking at the specs I could find on the two, the Apache looks like the better choice. What do you think? Well, the Apache will send SSB, which is a good feature to have, whereas the DX-100 won't. On the other hand, the DX-100 is much simpler, as a result. But I would pick whichever of the two is factory-wired. If they were both built as kits, I'd pick the one that has the best-looking solder joints. --scott -- Please reply in this newsgroup. I never post my true email address to prevent spam. Thank you. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:54:24 -0700 (PDT), Brian Burns
wrote: Hello All, I'm looking for an AM/CW rig in the 100 watt class, and may have a choice between a Heath DX-100 and a Heath Apache. In looking at the specs I could find on the two, the Apache looks like the better choice. What do you think? Cheers, Brian Ex: W5BRO, K6UCD The B&W 5100B is better than both except it does not have 160. B&W's sound great on AM and work fine on CW too. Dan N9JBF |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All,
Thanks for all the quick replies and good advice! I should know in a few days about the availability of the rigs. The B&W 5100 looks like a great rig, but I don't recall ever seeing one for sale. Were there only a few made? Or does everybody want to keep theirs? Cheers, Brian |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 May 2013 17:33:26 -0700 (PDT), Brian Burns
wrote: Hello All, Thanks for all the quick replies and good advice! I should know in a few days about the availability of the rigs. The B&W 5100 looks like a great rig, but I don't recall ever seeing one for sale. Were there only a few made? Or does everybody want to keep theirs? Cheers, Brian I think it's a combination of few made and the owners don't want to get rid of them. They have great audio. I have had several and was always happy with performance. Also like the low pass filter that was built in. What price range are you looking at? My email addy is danl4NOster@gmail without the NO, if you would rather not say online. N9JBF Dan |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Apache help needed!! | Boatanchors | |||
Apache help needed!! | Boatanchors | |||
Apache and Other Gear | Boatanchors | |||
WTB Heathkit DX-100 or Apache | Equipment | |||
WTB Heathkit DX-100 or Apache | Equipment |