Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I finally got to hear HD Radio (a.k.a. IBOC) on several Boston FM's
Saturday night (but not any AM's since it was night). My observations: 1. HD Radio does not sound appreciably better than FM. 2. On some of the stations there was a "gritty" quality to the sound reminiscent of an MP3 Internet stream. To be fair, this could have been the result of cascading HD Radio with an STL or digital audio storage system employing something like MPEG or apt-X compression, and not something inherent in HD Radio itself. 3. HD Radio does not appear to extend a station's coverage. On the fringe of one station's coverage, where it could be heard in analog FM imperfectly, the HD Radio was generally not audible at all. We estimated that the effective range of the HD Radio signal is 90 to 95 percent of that of the analog FM. 4. The Kenwood receiver seems to mute in digital mode if there is another signal on an adjacent channel. 5. It also mutes in the presence of nearby FM transmitter sites. 6. In analog mode, the digital sidebands of a station running HD Radio can be heard as white noise. It is not yet possible to guess how much interference they may cause because only a few stations are running HD Radio yet. 7. The scrolling text display some stations were running may be a considerable distraction to drivers. After hearing some glowing reviews, I was prepared to hear something approaching the sound of a CD and to want to push to put it on our stations. Instead, my friends and I were asking ourselves why anyone would want to pay $75,000 for it. However, I am still reserving judgment. One night of listening on one radio isn't enough; I want to hear it on several different radios on a wider variety of stations, under different reception scenarios. I'm particularly interested in the effect of adjacent-channel interference. umar |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|