Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Guys
The only negative Ihave read is that the audio quality is very poor and there is a rather complicated mod to improve it. I have a pro-2045 and it is my only reference and it sounds fine, not tinny at all. Opinions? thx bob (sorry for the crosspost from alt.scanner) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:53:38 GMT, "steelguitar" in rec.radio.scanner -
et : Hi Guys The only negative Ihave read is that the audio quality is very poor and there is a rather complicated mod to improve it. I have a pro-2045 and it is my only reference and it sounds fine, not tinny at all. Opinions? If all you have is a 2045, your ears will certainly thank you. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have several 2006's as well as a 2004, a 2005 and a 2045. While there
are other radios with better receive audio quality the 2006's is no worse than any other scanner out there. You can improve the audio quality by improving the speaker used, I have had good luck using refurbished surplus GE Mastr2 speakers as well as Motorola mobile speakers. I ran a 2005 in my cars for years until last February when I bought a new car and replaced the 2006 with a BC780. Since my mounting required an external speaker I used a Moto speaker purchased at a hamfest and it worked fine. I have not done any of the published audio mods on my 200x series radios, never felt the need. I have a 2006 on my desk at work, 2 in the shack at home and another in storage. The 3 I use every day seem to have plenty of audio punch, the 2005 I used in the car(s) for about 10 years drove an external speaker just fine in a mobile enviornment. The 2045 seems to have decent audio as well. I despise the button layout however, being so used to the 2004/5/6. Mine also has a pretty loud transformer hum, so I run it on 12 VDC instead. Receives fine, just a pain to program. In article et, "steelguitar" wrote: Hi Guys The only negative Ihave read is that the audio quality is very poor and there is a rather complicated mod to improve it. I have a pro-2045 and it is my only reference and it sounds fine, not tinny at all. Opinions? thx bob (sorry for the crosspost from alt.scanner) -- Rich Carlson, N9JIG rich (at) n9jig.com IL Highways and Scanner page: http://www.n9jig.com Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association: http://www.carmachicago.com In Deo speramus, ceteros omnes observamus |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Dx | |||
AM audio quality: analog vs. digital | Broadcasting |