"Katz" wrote in
oups.com:

JSF wrote:
Looks as good as the last one, why the changes?
Is there active bias? looks like it.

Still glad to see that there is someone that cares about their work.
The other amp makers do very ****ty work and looks like it.


While I commend you on your emphasis on 'quality', it's too bad you are
wasting your talents building 'CB' amplifiers. The amateur radio
community could use a source of quality 'legal' 160-10 solid state
amps.

73



Hams would still be able to build their own amps if dumbed down licensing
hadn't turned them all into appliance operators.

Sc

Capability and ability are 2 vastly different things.

--

Clif

"Fast Code" wrote in message
t...
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:37:39 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Hams would still be able to build their own amps if dumbed down licensing
hadn't turned them all into appliance operators.


Hams can still build their own amps, FOOL. It's all there in Part 97
for those who can read.

LMFAO at the 'tard.

On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 01:08:37 +0000 (UTC), "Fast Code"
wrote:

On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:37:39 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Hams would still be able to build their own amps if dumbed down licensing
hadn't turned them all into appliance operators.

Hams can still build their own amps, FOOL. It's all there in Part 97
for those who can read.

LMFAO at the 'tard.

LMFAO at the one who doesn't understand the difference between "would
be able to", "can" and "are allowed to".