Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life, but you should learn it anyway just in case. why? why is the fantastic ly unlikely something you should eb prepared for? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"an old freind" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life, but you should learn it anyway just in case. why? why is the fantastic ly unlikely something you should eb prepared for? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in news
![]() On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:12:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote: wrote in m: On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:23:06 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "an old freind" wrote in egroups.com: Slow Code wrote: You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life, but you should learn it anyway just in case. why? why is the fantastic ly unlikely something you should eb prepared for? why does the trol Slow code hate ham radio? http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Motivating hams to be better hams is a good thing. For example, if you were going to lose your internet if you didn't learn how to type and spell after a year, I'm sure you'd be learning how to type and spell. But since there is no requirement that you have to type and spell properly after a year, you continue on murdering the english language. nope you over look facts, I can't type or spel without making at least twice the effort you do That's why you'll never be a good ham. You refuse to put forth the effort. SC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Antenna | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | General | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Shortwave | |||
If you had to die to save someone's life, would that person send CW? | Antenna |